Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HomeLife Academy ^ | 29 Sep 2003

Posted on 09/29/2003 10:30:34 AM PDT by xzins


The following study can be found in its entirety at:

About the study

Bob Jones University Press Testing and Evaluation Service, the largest home school testing service in the nation, provides Assessment services to home school students and private schools on a fee-for-service basis. In Spring 1998, 39,607 home school students were contracted to take the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS, grades K-8) or the Tests of Achievement and Proficiency (TAP, grades 9-12). Both the ITBS and TAP are published by Riverside Publishing Company and were developed after careful review of national and state curricula and standards.

BJUP certified the test administrators, many of whom were the students' parents. Students were given an achievement test, and their parents were asked to complete a questionnaire entitled "Voluntary Home School Demographic Survey." This questionnaire, designed by the researcher and staff of Home School Legal Defense Association, was significantly shorter than previous survey instruments. It posed all questions in an objective format, rather than a constructed response format. National Computer Systems was commissioned to publish the questionnaire on computer scannable forms, removing the need for manual data processing.

Parents returned the completed tests and questionnaires to BJUP. The tests were then bundled and sent to Riverside Publishers for machine scoring, and the questionnaires were bundled and sent to National Computer Systems for scanning.

Unlike previous studies, the parents did not know their children's scores before agreeing to participate in this study.

Electronic copies of 23,415 test results and 23,311 questionnaire results were then sent to Dr. Lawrence Rudner. A total of 20,760 students in 11,930 families provided useable questionnaires with corresponding achievement tests. The achievement test and questionnaire results were combined to form the dataset used in this analysis. The resulting report, Scholastic Achievement and Demographic Characteristics of Home School Students in 1998, was published in the peer-reviewed journal Educational Policy Analysis Archives (

About the researcher

Dr. Lawrence M. Rudner is with the College of Library and Information Services, University of Maryland in College Park. He has been involved in quantitative analysis for over 30 years, having served as a university professor, a branch chief in the U.S. Department of Education, and a classroom teacher. For the past 12 years, he has been the Director of the ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. ERIC is an information service sponsored by the National Library of Education, U.S. Department of Education, which acquires and abstracts articles and manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of education; builds and maintains on-line databases; publishes articles and books; and provides a wide range of user services. Dr. Rudner holds a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology (1977), an MBA in Finance (1991), and lifetime teaching certificates from two states. His two children attend public school.

The Study

How do home schoolers measure up?

Home school students do exceptionally well when compared with the nationwide average. In every subject and at every grade level of the ITBS and TAP batteries, home school students scored significantly higher than their public and private school counterparts.

Because home education allows each student to progress at his or her own rate, almost one in four home school students (24.5%) are enrolled one or more grades above age level. It should be noted that home school scores were analyzed according to the student's enrolled grade rather than according to the student's age level. In other words, a 10-year-old home school student enrolled in 5th grade would have been compared to other students in the 5th grade, rather than to his age-level peers in the 4th grade. Thus, the demonstrated achievement of home schoolers is somewhat conservative.On average, home school students in grades 1-4 perform one grade level higher than their public and private school counterparts.

The achievement gap begins to widen in grade 5; by 8th grade the average home school student performs four grade levels above the national average.

Another significant finding is that students who have been home schooled their entire academic lives have the highest scholastic achievement. The difference becomes especially pronounced during the higher grades, suggesting that students who remain in home school throughout their high school years continue to flourish in that environment.

Differences were also found among home school students when they were classified by amount of money spent on education, family income, parent education, and television viewing. However, it should be noted that home school students in every category scored significantly higher than the national average.

No meaningful difference was found among home school students when classified by gender. Significantly, there was also no difference found according to whether or not a parent was certified to teach. For those who would argue that only certified teachers should be allowed to teach their children at home, these findings suggest that such a requirement would not meaningfully affect student achievement.

Who home schools?

The home school community is undoubtedly a unique segment of American society. Far from being a cross-section of the American public, home schoolers stand out in several areas beyond the obvious distinction of their educational choices.The background questionnaires returned for this study reveal that, on average, home school parents have more formal education than parents in the general population, with 88% having continued their education beyond high school compared to 50% for the nation as a whole. Furthermore, almost one in four home school students (24%) has at least one parent who is a certified teacher.Home school families have a higher median income ($52,000 in 1997) than the median income of all American families with children ($36,000 in 1995). Home school families also tend to be larger than the national average; the majority (62.1%) have three or more children, while most American families with school-age children (79.6%) have only one or two children.

The overwhelming majority of home schooling parents are married couples (97.3%), compared to only 72% of families with school-age children nationwide. Furthermore, 76.9% of home school mothers do not work for pay, while 86.3% of those who do work, only work part-time. Nationwide, in 1996, only 30% of married women with children under 18 did not participate in the labor force.

The home school students who participated in the study were proportionally younger than the general American school population. Only 11.4% of home school students were in grades 9-12, compared to 30.3% of all students nationwide. This could be due to the relative newness of the home school movement, early graduation from high school, the desire of some students to attend a public or private high school, or simply the fact that some older students do not take achievement tests, opting instead for SAT preparatory testing.

The home schooling community contains a smaller percentage of racial minorities (6%) than public schools nationally (32.8%). The religious preferences of home schooling mothers who participated in this study are most often Independent Fundamental (25.1%), Baptist (24.4%), Independent Charismatic (8.2%), Roman Catholic (5.4%), Assembly of God (4.1%), Presbyterian (3.8%), or Reformed (3.4%). In 93.1% of families, the religious preference of the father was the same as that of the mother. (Home school leaders believe the high numbers of mothers and fathers reporting evangelical preferences is likely skewed in favor of religious home schoolers, since the families obtained the tests through a religious supplier. However, there is no known reason to believe that secular home school students perform at a lower academic level than religious home schoolers.)

Another distinguishing characteristic is that home schooled children tend to watch significantly less television than do average American children. On average, only 1.6% of home schoolers in the 4th grade watch more than three hours of television per day, compared to nearly 40% of 4th graders nationwide.

The median amount of money spent in 1997 on educational materials for home school students was $400. When we consider this relatively small expenditure in light of the high scholastic achievement of most home school students, we can reasonably conclude that it does not require a great deal of money to home school successfully.

Why are home schoolers succeeding?

Without a doubt, the Rudner study demonstrates that home schooled students are doing exceptionally well. The question why? , however, is one that this study cannot sufficiently answer. Home school students typically come from families where income is relatively high, marriages are intact, and dedication to education is strong. We do not know how these children would have performed had they been placed in public or private school, nor can we say that this study proves the superiority of home schooling over other educational choices. The answer to these questions lies not in statistics, but rather in individual stories.

Many times over the past two decades, important legislative, legal, and policy decisions have been made, in part, based on the perceived or actual academic performance of home educated students. It should not be necessary, nor is it really possible, to prove that home education is better than institutional schools. It is clear that the average home school child performs significantly higher than the average public school child. Given the demographic distinctions between the groups under comparison, it is only safe and fair to conclude that home education works well for those who are choosing this form of education. Without needing to criticize other forms of education, we can confidently assure policy makers that this system delivers solid academic results.

With this in view, it would be contrary to the evidence to suggest that public school regulatory measures are justifiably imposed on home schoolers. Specifically, this study found no valid correlation between teacher certification and student achievement. It would be a misuse of this study to suggest that teacher certification is not valid in public schools. By the same token, it would be a lapse in common sense to believe that imposing certification on home school families is necessary for good academic results.

Another noteworthy fact uncovered by this study is that home school achievement tends to improve the longer a child has been taught at home. This distinction is especially great in the higher grades. Clearly, home education is not just a quick fix for problem cases, nor is it only for young children. It is a valid educational option, creating students who love learning and young adults who are well prepared for a bright future.

The only theoretical way to perform a perfect experiment to determine if home schooling is better or worse than public or private schools is to use a randomized control design. A large number of children would be randomly selected and required to attend home school. Another group of children would be randomly selected and required to attend public or private school. Clearly that is not possible. But even that "pure" design would have a major flaw. It fails to consider one factor that clearly contributes to home education's success--parental motivation. Because home schooling, by its very nature, is practiced only in families where parents are strongly motivated, it is undetermined what would happen if unmotivated parents were randomly assigned to home educate their children.

This study does not enter the theoretical domain. It simply measures the families who are motivated to home school and concludes that they are doing very well. The most telling demonstration of home education's success, however, will be the individual lives of young people who grow up and go out to impact the nation and the world. We look forward in great anticipation to the Patrick Henrys, John Quincy Adamses, and Thomas Edisons of the modern home schooling movement.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: achievement; homeschool; results; statistics; stats; testing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 09/29/2003 10:30:34 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xzins; SpookBrat; 2Jedismom; swheats; SuziQ; annyokie; Carry_Okie
Excellent article.
2 posted on 09/29/2003 10:36:12 AM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Look at the last section about why homeschoolers are succeeding.

There are some things to consider there about the advantages that homeschoolers have. Intact families, higher income, high regard for education.

I think that anything that works deserves a pat on the back. (Although you wonder how many homeschoolers don't take these tests, and therefore, their numbers are not included in the averages.)

A friends daughter just clepped out of college and went directly to law school.....she's homeschooled and 19 years old.
3 posted on 09/29/2003 10:38:54 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Thanks for posting this.
4 posted on 09/29/2003 10:41:20 AM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (As thy sword hath made women childless, so shall thy mother be childless among women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"A friends daughter just clepped out of college and went directly to law school"

What law school? This is fascinating b/c it shows the out of the box thinking of a law school admissions office....not a venue generally known for out of the box thinking.
5 posted on 09/29/2003 10:43:26 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Way cool. Great resource!

It's obvious why the NEA hates homeschooling.

6 posted on 09/29/2003 10:44:09 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
Look at the part about how much money homeschoolers spend? It's mindboggling trying to balance that with the 7-10 thousand per child spent by the public school system.
7 posted on 09/29/2003 10:44:28 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
It in Chicago....not U of Chicago.

Gosh....starts with a "B" I think.

He told me that with 8 kids and homeschooling he had to find a way for his kids to get a cheap college education. Then he discovered the U of Oklahoma has a clep program that enables a person to clep out of a subject based on a clep test and about 55 bucks per class (or per credit hour...I forget which). In any case, she went to college that way. Studying and clepping.

Then she applied to law schools and this one in Chicago accepted her.

Anyone know a law school in/around Chicago that might start with a "B?"
8 posted on 09/29/2003 10:48:41 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins; mrs tiggywinkle; Teacher317
Bookmarked and thank you very much. This one gets sent to every professional educator of whom I am aware.
9 posted on 09/29/2003 10:49:15 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (California! See how low WE can go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Another anomaly is the statistical increase in Public Education scores from Home School students that go to a public school for a class or two. Even when only a day a week or for one class the school gets to add that students scores.

Allot Home School parents take advantage of these programs but have to allow the student to be tested and counted by the public school.
10 posted on 09/29/2003 10:50:32 AM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (As thy sword hath made women childless, so shall thy mother be childless among women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Private schools show the disparity as well.

A good private school may spend 3 grand to a public schools 10 grand and still provide a better education.
11 posted on 09/29/2003 10:52:22 AM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (As thy sword hath made women childless, so shall thy mother be childless among women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
There's something broken in the actual educating part in public schools.

12 posted on 09/29/2003 10:58:53 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xzins
13 posted on 09/29/2003 11:00:18 AM PDT by southernbychoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Great post!!
14 posted on 09/29/2003 11:01:18 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; netmilsdad

15 posted on 09/29/2003 11:04:37 AM PDT by 4mycountry (You say I'm a brat like it's a bad thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I personally think this can/could be the source of a balkanized nation in the future.

Children are not taught to learn or to think, they are taught to be a cog, to listen and perform to a acceptable standard.

Once adults it continues with politicians and the media.

When a country has no guidance though logic or enlightenment from history it will weaken. In the chaos we will turn more and more to direct democracy and that will fracture this nation, just as it has done to societies in the past.
16 posted on 09/29/2003 11:04:47 AM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (As thy sword hath made women childless, so shall thy mother be childless among women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
Probably not a fully-accredited law school. ABA-approved law schools may enroll only holders of bachelors degrees or their foreign equivalents, with some very limited exceptions for concurrent enrollment (when you do your first year of law school simultaneous with finishing your last year of college).

California has a wide variety of partially accredited (state approved) and totally unaccredited law schools. The totally unaccrediteds can do more or less whatever they want. They also have ultimate bar pass rates in the low double digits (15%-20% for the better ones...)
17 posted on 09/29/2003 11:09:31 AM PDT by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 4mycountry
You are toooo clever!!
18 posted on 09/29/2003 11:09:33 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Ray has gone bye-bye Egon, what have you got??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
Children are not taught to learn or to think, they are taught to be a cog, to listen and perform to a acceptable standard.

Home school critics think that home schools are guilty of this sin themselves, i.e., teaching kids to believe and spout back certain things instead of thinking critically.

It seems like a mixed-bag to me. I've met some very smart, thoughful home schoolers. I've also met some severely closed-minded and ill-educated home schoolers, too.

A lot comes down to motivation. Parents who want to raise smart children who learn in their own ways and are free to think beyond bureaucratic boundaries do a wonderful job. Parents who want to isolate their children from corrupting influences and ensure that they have the exact same social, political and religious beliefs that their parents have, do a terrible job. In any event, though, it's the parents' right and choice to do it however they see fit.
19 posted on 09/29/2003 11:15:01 AM PDT by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: only1percent
I would only say that critical thinking and an open mind are not the same thing.

I for one do not have an open mind per say, I do however think for myself. An open mind is about being fair and feeling good, thinking for oneself is about being right.
20 posted on 09/29/2003 11:29:17 AM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (As thy sword hath made women childless, so shall thy mother be childless among women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson