Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH TEAM VIEWS DEMOCRATIC FIELD AS 'UNUSUALLY WEAK'
The Drudge Report ^ | Sun Sep 28 2003 19:57:47 ET | Matt Drudge

Posted on 09/28/2003 7:29:55 PM PDT by .cnI redruM

President Bush's senior advisers describe the Democratic field as unusually weak heading in to the coming election year, Monday's NEW YORK TIMES is planning to report in a Page One splash.

"Each of them has relative strengths and weaknesses, but happily for us, in each case the relative weaknesses outweigh the relative strengths," Ed Gillespie, chairman of the Republican National Committee, tells the TIMES.

"They're all Howard Dean now. They have adopted harsh, bitter, personal attacks as their approach. They are a party of protest and pessimism and offer no positive agenda of their own."

Team Bush has delayed the start of running any advertising until a single Democrat is selected.

MORE

"We expect it to be a hard-fought, close election in a country narrowly divided," Karl Rove tells the TIMES. "When a Democratic nominee is finally selected, our expectation is that it could be a close and hard-fought race."

Like the Democrats, the Bush campaign is convinced that the election of 2004 could once again turn on a relative handful of votes in key states.

Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; bitterenders; demsareweak; dontgloat; edgillespie; gwb2004; icanjustcoast; losers; tooearly; yestoodamnearly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
>>>>>"They're all Howard Dean now. They have adopted harsh, bitter, personal attacks as their approach. They are a party of protest and pessimism and offer no positive agenda of their own."

True, but bile and hatred are a powerful combination. Evil must be fought and chickens should never be counted before they hatch.

1 posted on 09/28/2003 7:29:56 PM PDT by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
The NYT article
2 posted on 09/28/2003 7:32:17 PM PDT by Pokey78 ("I thought this country was founded on a principle of progressive taxation." Wesley Clark to Russert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
They are a party of protest and pessimism and offer no positive agenda of their own.

"Nattering nabobs of negativism"?

3 posted on 09/28/2003 7:33:39 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
"They're all Howard Dean now. They have adopted harsh, bitter, personal attacks as their approach.

He's being to kind in describing the Dem Clowns

4 posted on 09/28/2003 7:33:48 PM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Stupid DemocRATS. That tactic didn't work in 1992 or 1996 and it won't ........uhhhhhhhh.....wait a minute.
5 posted on 09/28/2003 7:33:48 PM PDT by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Don't get too confident or cocky!
6 posted on 09/28/2003 7:34:15 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Unusually weak? Aren`t they always weak? In everything?
7 posted on 09/28/2003 7:35:21 PM PDT by scabbage (Liberals-Nuke `em from orbit. it`s the only way to be sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
"Nattering nabobs of negativism"?

This is all that the Left has ever been about. It's just more obvious now as alternative media is breaking down their illusion.

8 posted on 09/28/2003 7:43:07 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scabbage
Not only weak, but criminal. Criminal isn't unusual for the Rats.
9 posted on 09/28/2003 7:43:55 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (If it weren't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: scabbage
They are not weak in their vile bile. Say have they talked to their doctor about the purple pill? (That commercial grates me everytime I hear it, kinda like when a democrap opens their mouth.)
10 posted on 09/28/2003 7:44:28 PM PDT by mplsconservative (Liberals view security like ostriches. Head in the sand, rear in the air. But they "feel" safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Bush '04 Readying for One Democrat, Not 10

WASHINGTON, Sept. 28 — President Bush's political advisers have set in motion an aggressive re-election machine, building a national network of get-out-the-vote workers and amassing a pile of cash for a blanket advertising campaign expected to begin around the time Democrats settle on their candidate early next year, party officials said.

Mr. Bush's senior advisers, in interviews last week, repeatedly described the Democratic field as unusually weak and divided, providing an important if temporary cushion for Mr. Bush.

Still, they said the recent sharp drop in the president's approval ratings, the continued loss of jobs in the economy and the problems plaguing the American occupation of Iraq only made the political outlook more uncertain in an election that they have long thought could be as tightly contested as the one in 2000.

"We expect it to be a hard-fought, close election in a country narrowly divided," said Karl Rove, Mr. Bush's senior adviser. "When a Democratic nominee is finally selected, our expectation is that it could be a close and hard-fought race."

The decision to delay the start of advertising until about the time the Democrats settle on a nominee is a rejection of what had been a central element of President Bill Clinton's re-election campaign. Mr. Clinton began advertising 16 months before Election Day, in an effort to define the election before the Republicans chose an opponent.

Republicans said that would be a waste of money, given the battle taking place among the Democrats. Instead, aides to Mr. Bush said, their campaign would begin spending when a Democratic nominee starts to emerge from the primary battle, probably battered and very likely almost broke.

[end snip-- click link for entire article]


11 posted on 09/28/2003 7:54:45 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Like the Democrats, the Bush campaign is convinced that the election of 2004 could once again turn on a relative handful of votes in key states.

This may seem like a shameless plug...but, it is important nonetheless, that given this fact, we don't have someone like this overseeing the votes being tabulated in any state. In 2000 we learned that we can't afford to not pay attention to state races like this as it was shown they can affect the entire nation--and having someone with integrity in that office is important.

12 posted on 09/28/2003 7:56:41 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat (Help us elect Republicans in Kentucky! Click on my name for links to all the 2003 candidates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I think the are being unusually POLITE......BAAAWWAAAAAAA
13 posted on 09/28/2003 8:00:02 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Looking for a Shrugged Atlas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
They have adopted Maintained a harsh, bitter, personal attack as their approach. They are a party of protest and pessimism and offer no positive agenda of their own."

Why change? It has worked for them in the last 10 years.

Except for losing control of Congress, the Senate, and the Presidency.

Personally, I kinda' like their approach!

14 posted on 09/28/2003 8:00:33 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Gee these advisors and such are right on top of things, ain't they? ;0)
15 posted on 09/28/2003 8:01:56 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (I like my women like I like my coffee - Hot, and in a big cup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
BUSH TEAM VIEWS DEMOCRATIC FIELD AS 'UNUSUALLY WEAK'

Ah, nostalgia! I luv to read the news from 1991, it makes me feel 14 years younger!

16 posted on 09/28/2003 8:02:35 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Far out, man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
I can hear that 1991 Oval Office conversation now:

"Piece of cake Sir - Cuomo's chickened out, so it's just Tsongas, Kerrey, Harkin, Jerry Brown...and that guy, forget the name, from Arkansas or some such place".

17 posted on 09/28/2003 8:20:23 PM PDT by dagnabbit (Stop Immigrating Terrorism. Repeal the 1965 Immigration Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dagnabbit
Yup.
18 posted on 09/28/2003 8:21:46 PM PDT by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dagnabbit
I agree if they said this. However, I wouldnt be surprised if the New York Times is spinning this for headlines to try to further make people think of Bush and his team as arrogant. The Media is in full warfare against Bush!
19 posted on 09/28/2003 8:27:28 PM PDT by shoedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: shoedog
Good point
20 posted on 09/28/2003 8:39:34 PM PDT by dagnabbit (Stop Immigrating Terrorism. Repeal the 1965 Immigration Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson