Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For the GOP, it's More than a Recall
Lt. Col. Gil Ferguson, USMC (Ret.)

Posted on 09/26/2003 12:00:31 PM PDT by StoneColdGOP

There is no argument about the serious condition of our once golden state. Our debt is greater than all the other states combined, we are but a few million dollars away from bankruptcy. Our tax burden and over regulations are driving business out of the state at an unprecedented rate.

We are at a crucial point in our state’s history. The people themselves; Democrat, Republican and Independents, without the approval or help from any party have called for an election to recall this governor and replace him with another, one who will hopefully lead us out of this mess.

There appears to be a wide agreement on the first question; should we recall Governor Davis. The second part, choosing a new governor, will not be difficult for most Democrats: theirs is a party line vote with only one candidate, Lt. Gov. Bustamante. And even though he said he will raise taxes and further regulate and tax business, forcing more of them to leave, they will vote for him.

For Republicans however this election is about more than which Republican we should vote for. This election is more about the party itself; will we continue to be a party of principle, directed by the philosophy of Lincoln and Reagan or have we laid our principles aside? Do we want to win so badly that it doesn’t matter how or who, just so the next governor has an R behind his name?

The GOP has two candidates: Arnold Schwarzenegger, a celebrity of worldwide fame, with popularity and fame as the Terminator and recognized as a super star among movie idols. He is a good man. His celebrity status alone will attract a huge number of votes for the GOP from Independents, Democrats and especially young voters. Among the 18 to 30 year olds, he is Britney Spears with muscles. They wow over him. Most moderate Republicans and many regular Republicans, those who desperately want a Republican to win, will vote for him. They are prepared to look beyond his political beliefs and character; they just want to win.

Sen. McClintock, on the other hand, is an icon among Republicans. Since the first day he was elected to office, nearly twenty years ago, he has led the fight against the very forces and policies that have now badly tarnished this once golden state. He fought Governor Wilson’s huge tax increase, just as hard as he fought Willie Brown and Gray Davis. His credentials, as well as his character as a conservative Republican, are impeccable.

He has been our party’s leader and severest critic of fraud, corruption and waste in state government. From the very beginning of his career until today, he has warned that unless spending was brought under control, California would end up as it has today.

The knock on McClintock is that he can’t raise the money and so, can’t win this election. The knock on Schwarzenegger is that he is not a true Republican and carries a lot of baggage that the Democrats will probably throw at him just before the election.

Actually, Arnold is no higher in the polls than he was when he started, whereas McClintock has risen from an asterisk to double digits.

In the last election, McClintock was outspent 30 to 1, yet he received more votes than any other other Republican on election day. Had those moderates claiming Tom can’t win today contributed to his election, or given him his fair share of the money donated by the national party, he would have won. McClintock lost the Controller’s race by the slimmest margin in history. Had he been helped by the moderates controlling our state party, California would not now be in the awful mess in which we find ourselves today.

The moderates of the party and most of the GOP congressmen are just where they were prior to the last Governor’s race. On orders from the White House and Karl Rove, many "conservative" congressman support Schwarzenegger, just as they endorsed the moderate Richard Riordan.

The moderates in our party, including the New Majority and those in the Lincoln Club, are intensely interested in electing Schwarzenegger, a moderate. They believe the party’s future, especially in California, is to adopt the Karl Rove/Parsky plan; we must forgo the values of the liberals and accept the invasion of illegals, adopt the big tent, tax and spend and big government philosophy of the Democrats.

Conservatives know that our party’s losses in California, all during the past decade, are due to millions of illegals who have entered California, and – the continued split in our party between the moderate, "Country Club" Republicans and the conservatives.

While Arnold has a high rating in the polls, it has never risen above where it started. McClintock on the other hand has been continually rising, from as asterisk to double digits. There is a cry from moderate Republicans and "concern" from the media that McClintock should withdraw in favor of Arnold, else the GOP might not win and the dreadful Bustamante will become governor.

This dilemma among the GOP might not be so tragic or apocryphal if the contest was between two conservatives, say Simon and McClintock, one would drop out when just before the election the other was ahead. The same can be said if the two Republicans were Arnold and some equally famous, moderate movie star, but it isn’t.

It’s between our brightest Republican star, a conservative icon and a dazzling celebrity. Conservatives at the core of the party are incredulous at those moderates who don’t share those core values, yet are asking the conservative standard bearer to drop out. Conservatives want to win but they know that a win that asks us to repudiate our principles is not a victory, it’s a harbinger of the end.

Lieutenant Colonel Gil Ferguson, USMC (Ret.), served in the California State Assembly from 1984 to 1994.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: mcwampum; recall; tommcclintock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 381-392 next last
To: SunStar
I agree with you ,when does the compromising end ? Just vote this way this time and then later we go for the whole thing next time ,but the next time never comes.If California gets Bustamante so be it you get what you deserve ,maybe one day the Republicans will grow balls again ,but I am tired of putting my tail between my legs with these cowards who wont fight for what is right and if that means its all over then so be it
201 posted on 09/26/2003 1:53:21 PM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: milan
If every conservative who said, "I wish McClintock could win, but he can't," actually voted for Tom, he would win with a >40% plurality.

Why do I say this? Recent polling data suggests that Schwarzenegger is "winning" the conservative vote by a 5:3 ratio. If all conservatives (Republicans, Libertarians, etc), the natural constituency of McClintock, stayed with him, rather than polling at 15% he would be closer to 40%. Afterall, he got 49.5% of the vote last November - better than any Republican in the statewide election. But far too many conservatives lack the political backbone to stay the course and are willing to settle for their second choice.

202 posted on 09/26/2003 1:54:34 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: milan
Why is this so hard to get through to people?

I think that most of the Tomikazis that are left on FR simply hate Arnold. It has nothing to do with philosophy or ideology. They simply hate him, for some reason. So they 1) put words into his mouth (see SunStar's frequent use of his lying graphic about Arnold being in favor of late-term abortions, etc.), and 2) refuse to hear his obviously conservative fiscal and economic policy positions.

203 posted on 09/26/2003 1:55:38 PM PDT by My2Cents (Well...there you go again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Having Schwarzenegger as governor and McClintock as his right-hand man in the state senate would make a very powerful duo.

I seriously doubt Mr.S would look to Tom to be his point man in the Senate. Someone like John Burton is more his style.

204 posted on 09/26/2003 1:55:55 PM PDT by StoneColdGOP (McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000; StoneColdGOP
I'm not badmouthing Arnold - I'm badmouthing the party I have been a member of since I was 18. They put up Arnold and that is what I have a problem - not the man himself. He obviously loves his country, wants to serve and is willing to be somewhat puppet-like.

You don't need to cop the "read for comprehension" attitude nor did you quote anything that had to do with the point of the article. My impression is that the point is the diachotomy of what the G.O.P. stands for and who they have selected.

Perhaps the orginal poster of the article can elaborate/correct.

205 posted on 09/26/2003 1:56:16 PM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
KellyAdmirer, whose flag is set to the great state of Colorado, writes:

Yes, but his position has about as much likelihood of going into effect as McClintock has of winning. And what happens in California affects us here in Colorado very directly.

OK, I got the "yes" part. Now, what does history teach us about appeasers? ;-)

206 posted on 09/26/2003 1:56:26 PM PDT by SteveH ((Californians for, like, you know, Moon Unit!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
Just happened to see your screen name when I was scrolling through before I leave the office.
It's good to see you back!

CD

207 posted on 09/26/2003 1:57:51 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC
If you support the killing of 3000 innocent unborn children everyday, every month, every year, does that make you "un-Christian"? Yes.

This has got to be one of the most disingenuous statements I've ever read on FreeRepublic. Disgusting. So, now, the vote in the recall is a validation of one's spiritual condition?

208 posted on 09/26/2003 1:58:20 PM PDT by My2Cents (Well...there you go again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Not true. You have to go where people are in order to reach them. (Another biblical truth which can be seen by Jesus and Paul's actions). If they are walking east, you will not be able to convince them of much if you are walking west. You have to walk east with them for a while in order to even have a conversation with them.

I know I said I was gonna leave it, but...

I appreciate your analogy but I don't think it fits. Paul & Christ indeed were not afraid to go where the need was greatest, but certainly never compromised their core beliefs.

In fact if you contemplate their earthly fates you'd have to agree the reverse was true.

209 posted on 09/26/2003 1:59:01 PM PDT by skeeter (Fac ut vivas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I think that most of the Tomikazis that are left on FR simply hate Arnold.

You say we don't listen to Arnold and yet you post this dung? Nearly all of the Tom Mc supporters on this thread are speaking of principles... pay attention and stop putting words in our mouths.

210 posted on 09/26/2003 1:59:22 PM PDT by pgyanke (We wouldn't have to fight our War on Terror if Islam would take out its own trash!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: SteveH
Appeasers? LOL, if you view every compromiser or non-doctrinaire conservative as an "appeaser," you must have REALLY despised Ronald Reagan!
211 posted on 09/26/2003 1:59:26 PM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
Nearly all of the Tom Mc supporters on this thread are speaking of principles...

No, most of the McC supporters on this particular thread are small, angry, little men.

212 posted on 09/26/2003 2:01:03 PM PDT by My2Cents (Well...there you go again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
#1 - The Indians are just like any other special interest (unions, lawyers, pro-gun, anti-tax), they give their money to folks they like hoping someone will get elected. They have no particular Party leaning. They support Democrats much of the time in California because Democrats ARE much of California and its elected officials. What makes Tom different is that he was on their side of gaming issues and sovereignty long before they could have ever offered him money.

#2 - If you're really going to take something in the L.A. Times at face value then getting Tom to drop out is the least of your worries, pal.
213 posted on 09/26/2003 2:01:04 PM PDT by StoneColdGOP (McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP; habs4ever; All
You're not even some out-of-stater opining on California, you're a frickin' CANADIAN?!

From here

Habs4ever Registered User Joined: Feb 2002 Location: Montreal, (Quebec)

214 posted on 09/26/2003 2:01:24 PM PDT by SteveH ((Californians for, like, you know, Moon Unit!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Furthermore - most Tom supporters aren't even participating. As you may have noticed the Freeper poll shows support is pretty evenly split.
215 posted on 09/26/2003 2:02:37 PM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I'm on FR to debate the issues. If you want to get into name-calling, do it with someone else.
216 posted on 09/26/2003 2:03:21 PM PDT by pgyanke (We wouldn't have to fight our War on Terror if Islam would take out its own trash!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Do you realize that over 90% of your posts on this thread have been all about personal insults and nothing about substance?

I asked you to comment on the original article. Did you ever respond?
217 posted on 09/26/2003 2:03:49 PM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
No, most of the McC supporters on this particular thread are small, angry, little men.

I left out "self-righteous."

218 posted on 09/26/2003 2:03:51 PM PDT by My2Cents (Well...there you go again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior
This is about replacing Grey Davis. Plain and simple.

And if that comes down to choosing between someone much worse or someone who will compromise the soul of the very Republican Party which is tainting itself to win, I'll vote to keep Davis.

219 posted on 09/26/2003 2:04:43 PM PDT by StoneColdGOP (McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
"So, now, the vote in the recall is a validation of one's spiritual condition?"

If you mean the Pro-Life position - You said it, not me. What do you think the ProLife position is? An accounting problem? An ecological problem? Transportation? Trade? Weather? Infrastructure? Energy? What?

220 posted on 09/26/2003 2:05:18 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (from tomasUSMC FIGHT FOR THE LAND OF THE FREE AND HOME OF THE BRAVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 381-392 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson