Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shilling for Schwarzenegger: Hugh Hewitt strikes again
September 24th, 2003 | Sabertooth

Posted on 09/24/2003 12:33:19 PM PDT by Sabertooth

Hugh Hewitt, a well-known conservative radio talk show host and political columnist, has written a short column today called California recall: One issue, and one issue only

Hewitt got on the Arnold Schwarzenegger bandwagon the day after the actor's candidacy was announced on Jay Leno's Tonight Show. His column today is a hopeful attempt to at favorable spin for Schwarzenegger prior to tonight's gubernatorial debate (6:00 pm, PDT), the first at which Schwarzenegger's appeared.

A few of Hugh's highlights...

My take is that unless Arnold comes up with the California equivalent of President Ford's declaration of a free Poland in 1976, the debate will be a non-factor in the race.

Oh, it could seal the end of Tom McClintock's career if he tries to land cheap shots on Arnold

Hugh Hewitt is fretting about "cheap shots" against the debate-ducking, excited-to-be-learning-the-issues Anold Schwarzenegger?

Will Hewitt's definition of "cheap shots" include any mention of Schwarzenegger's left-leaning comments or positions that are the issue for tens of thousands of California Republicans not willing, at this point, to vote for Arnold? Should McClintock tip-toe around all of that, for the dubious "good of the party?"

Schwarzenegger has conducted a run-and-hide campaign, hoping the field would clear as he ran out the clock. Didn't happen, Hugh. Bad strategy.

Schwarzenegger missed chances to earn respect and sway holdouts by skipping debates. There are consequences to missed opportunities.

There is only one issue that matters to most voters. It absorbs all other issues in this race: The corruption in Sacramento.

The workers' comp mess? It is about the corrupt influence of the trial lawyers. The huge giveaways to prison guards and other public-employee unions? The corrupt influence of big labor. The massive expansion of tribal casinos and the obscene amount of money pouring from the slots into the voting process? The corrupt influence of California's Indian tribes.

Leave it to Hugh Hewitt to prepare a laundry list of Sacramento's corruption that doesn't include Gray Davis' legally questionable spiking of California's Proposition #187, after it was held in the judicial dungeon of Carter appointee, District Judge Marian Pfaelzer for three and a half years under the Pete Wilson administration.

Proposition #187 would have prevented much of the fiscal crisis now facing California, by preventing the State from paying any benefits or providing social services to California's millions of Illegal Aliens. The corrupt Democrats used the courts and a dubious arbitration process to thwart the will of the voters here.

The Democrats knew they could get away with it, because of the rank cowardice of the Republic Party, from the RNC, Jack Kemp, Bill Bennett, George W. Bush, Orrin Hatch, John McCain, etc., on down. Democrat corruption doesn't happen in a vacuum, it is enabled by do-nothing Republicans.

Among the do-nothings on Illegal Aliens are not a few self-absorbed conserative talk show hosts, such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Medved, and... Hugh Hewitt.

No surprise, then, that Hewitt won't mention Sacramento's corruption with regard to Illegal Aliens: Hugh is part of the problem.

Most of this corruption is legal. Most corruption is. But the stench of the decay in Sacramento doesn't diminish because Gray Davis has invented transparency in payoffs. The tribes brazenly gave millions to Cruz who transferred it to an anti-initiative campaign that features, surprise, Cruz. The money-laundering is out in the open, on the front lawn of the State House - but it is no less corrupt.

Gray Davis' penchant for soliciting donations just prior to signing or vetoing legislation that would affect the donors is legendary, and a clear violation of conflict-of-interest, in spirit, if not in law.

But Hugh Hewitt goes on...

The tribes pumped huge sums into a pro-McClintock fund. This is legal, but it stinks. It is a manipulation of the electorate - a cynical assist to Cruz via the draining of votes from Arnold. Corrupt? Of course it is. Tom McClintock cannot raise enough money on his own under the $21,200 limit of the law, so he's welcoming the tribes' largesse via an independent expenditure.

As for McClintock, any campaign finance law that respected the First Amendment would allow the tribes to give as much money as they please direcly to his campaign. People who don't like gambling or Indian casinos are free to vote against candidates who recieve campaign contributions for the trbes.

One example of such a candidate, of course, would be Arnold Schwarzenegger, who took contributions from some Indian tribes in the campaign for his government-growing, Proposition 49 - after school program.

Democrat Cruz Bustamante denounced Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger as a "phony" and a "hypocrite" for running television ads questioning the political clout of Indian gaming tribes that have contributed large amounts of money to the lieutenant governor.

He noted that Schwarzenegger raised money from tribes to support last year's Proposition 49, the Schwarzenegger-sponsored ballot initiative to finance after-school programs.
San Diego Union-Tribune - September 24th, 2003

Ooops.

That's a bit of legal corruption (by his own definition) that slips under Hugh Hewtt's selective radar, while he's shilling for Arnold Schwarzenegger.

And ain't if funny how Hugh Hewitt objects to independent expenditures on behalf of Tom McClintock, given that...

...records show that Total Recall, a committee controlled by Schwarzenegger that is permitted to raise unlimited sums to promote the recall, is also spending money specifically to boost Schwarzenegger's candidacy. Records show that Total Recall transferred $211,000 to Californians for Schwarzenegger, and is helping to pay the salaries of several top campaign staffers.

Colleen McAndrews, the campaign's lawyer and treasurer, said the division of money between the two committees was done with the approval of the Fair Political Practices Committee, the agency charged with overseeing state campaign finance law.
Davis, Schwarzenegger lead fund-raising race
Redding Record Searchlight - August 29th, 2003

Here is a list of 19 donors (including Arnold), to Schwarzenegger's Total Recall Campaign, which isn't subject to California's Proposition #34 campaign finance restrictions...

Arnold Schwarzenegger's Total Recall Committee
19 records found (1 page.)


Contributor Employer Amount Date
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER [Google]  OAK PRODUCTIONS, INC. $500,000 09.04.2003
ALEX SPANOS [Google]  A. G. SPANOS COMPANIES $100,000 09.09.2003
AMERICAN STERLING CORPORATION [Google]   $100,000 09.08.2003
WILLIAM A. ROBINSON [Google]  NONE $100,000 09.16.2003
WILLIAM LYONS HOMES, INC. [Google]   $100,000 08.22.2003
PAUL FOLINO [Google]  EMULEX $99,164 08.25.2003
CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. [Google]   $78,800 09.09.2003
THE NEW MAJORITY PAC [Google]   $78,800 09.18.2003
DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. [Google]   $60,000 09.05.2003
FLETCHER JONES MANAGEMENT [Google]   $57,600 09.08.2003
PAUL FOLINO [Google]  EMULEX $40,000 09.22.2003
TIMOTHY DRAPER (THE TIMOTHY DRAPER LIVING TRUST) [Google]  DRAPER, FISHER, JURVETSON $20,000 09.22.2003
FRANK E. BAXTER [Google]  JEFFERIES & COMPANY, INC. $10,000 09.22.2003
ROBERT YELLIN [Google]  CAL. PROTECTION $10,000 09.02.2003
TIMOTHY DRAPER (THE TIMOTHY DRAPER LIVING TRUST) [Google]  DRAPER, FISHER, JURVETSON $10,000 09.19.2003
JOHN HURLEY [Google]  CAVALRY ASSET MGMT. $3,442 09.10.2003
JOHN STAHR [Google]  LATHAM & WATKINS $2,500 08.28.2003
JOHN C. HERKLOTZ [Google]  NONE $2,000 09.19.2003
JOHN R. SAUNDERS [Google]  SAUNDERS PROPERTY CO. $2,000 09.18.2003
Total itemized contributions to committee: $1,374,306  
19 records found (1 page.)



Arnold Schwarzenegger's Total Recall Committee
RecallMoney.com - Updated September 22nd, 2003

For a complete list of donors to Californians for Schwarzenegger, who are subject to California's campaign finance restrictions, go here.

Note Schwarzenegger's $1.5 million loan to his own campaign. Though the loan is legal, potential for conflicts of interest will arise when Schwarzenegger is raising the money to pay himself back.

Note also that Hugh Hewitt omits all of this information in his piece today.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: hewitt; hughhewitt; mcclintock; recall; schwarzenegger; specialinterests
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Ohioan
Sabertooth conveniently forgets that McClintock is from Hillary country ... born in New York State. But he chooses to overlook that in his zeal to malign Hewitt as a carpetbagger - even though HH has been here just as long, if not longer, than McClintock.
41 posted on 09/24/2003 2:33:58 PM PDT by MattGarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
OMG - LOL
42 posted on 09/24/2003 2:37:00 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet ("Mary, help!" - General Wesley Clark, presidential candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MattGarrett

TOM McCLINTOCK: McClintock can't win!



from NEWSMAX.COM:
Issa said that McClintock had admitted to him that it was unlikely he could win a one-on-one race for governor.
43 posted on 09/24/2003 2:45:49 PM PDT by MattGarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cousin Eddie
Tom is going to finish ahead of Arnold in any case
so he will not be toast if anyone's going to
the spoiler it will be Arnold.
44 posted on 09/24/2003 2:47:19 PM PDT by Princeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
You Ca conservatives keep sitting on your asses and repeating that mantra he can't win, he can't win and son of a gun, you will be right. Broke and refugees but right.
45 posted on 09/24/2003 2:51:55 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MattGarrett
Gary Bauer endorses John McCain, 2000:

We have to return to a country of courage, honesty and decency," Bauer said. "It is with that in mind that I endorse, without hesitation, the candidacy of John McCain in exchange for a front-row seat at his inauguration."

Gary Bauer endorses Tom McClinton, 2003:


One has a clear vision for California, the other has rhetoric and platitudes. One has years of blockbuster experience on the "silver screen," the other has years of invaluable experience in the political arena dealing with California's problems and creating solutions for its citizens,"
46 posted on 09/24/2003 2:58:12 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
Well we have to consider the alternative that Schwarzenegger juct can't win. He has high negatives, and surprisingly low support. He's not running a terrific campaign- and he is not making an effort to appeal to voters he needs.

When one of the republicans drop out, the Democrats are assured a victory. They have used a strategy in California for over ten years of trashing the GOP candidate at the last minute. If their is only one candidate, they will be completely successful.

47 posted on 09/24/2003 3:06:33 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Princeliberty
Tom ahead of Arnold? In votes? How do you figure?
48 posted on 09/24/2003 3:09:18 PM PDT by Cousin Eddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DManA
I would suggest you get a clue about the California electorate before popping off about the recall election. If you think that McClintock has ANY chance of a win, then you're farther off in Fantasyland than I am, and I'm just eight miles from Disneyland.

What's funniest to me is that I'm a Libertarian -- and make 'protest' votes every election. Even I understand the importance of voting for Ah-nold, because if Bustamonte wins, the California Republican Party will be a complete joke.

Tip to those of you who don't live in California: don't try and amaze us with your grasp of politics, because you don't understand California politics. If you're deluded enough to think that McNader has a chance, then your political acumen is SEVERELY lacking.

Nobody is spitting on McNader (yet), but if he spoils this election, McNader will have a tough time getting elected to his Neighborhood Watch council.

49 posted on 09/24/2003 3:10:00 PM PDT by zoyd (Hi, I'm with the government. We're going to make you like your neighbor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
>> PRO ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION??? That's a lie, and you know it. <<

ROTFL!!

"Immigration has been the engine of California's economic prosperity and the richness of our culture. Almost 9 million Californians were born in a foreign country and nearly 40% of all households in our state speak a second language in addition to English. We have a proud tradition...There are approximately 8 million undocumented immigrants in the United States; 2.5 million reside in California... Immigration is a national responsibility and California should not be left to shoulder the massive burden of providing public services to illegal immigrants. Last year, California only received $220 million. This is insufficient, and as governor of California, I will work with Congress, President Bush, and the Governors of other border states to correct this situation. As Governor I will: seek reimbursement from Washington for health care and education costs associated with illegal immigration."
--Schwarzenegger campaign website - joinarnold.com

"I will aggressively lobby Washington... for addressing the undocumented immigrants currently in the United States. Deportation is not an option. We need to find a way to legitimize these individuals and get them on a path toward legal residency status in the United States. Foreign Worker Protections: Applicability of all U.S. labor standards and portability so that workers may change jobs without jeopardizing their immigration status. "
--Schwarzenegger campaign website - joinarnold.com

" Proposition 187 has been resolved by the courts. It is time to move on. More than 2.3 million undocumented immigrants currently live in California. They cannot continue to live underground . I will work with federal officials to address this problem. "
--Schwarzenegger campaign website - joinarnold.com

Schwartznegger said allowing undocumented immigrants to stay in the United States is "the right thing to do."
--Sacramento Bee, August 28th, 2003

Schwartzenegger repeated his support for a guest-worker visa program -- "then they can (get) driver's licenses hooked together with insurance." He then [said] he supported proposed federal legislation that would help those in the United States illegally become legal residents more quickly."
--Sacramento Bee - September 17th, 2003

50 posted on 09/24/2003 3:18:49 PM PDT by BillyBoy (George Ryan deserves a long term...without parole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Fred
Ben Stein is a truly bad person...commits mercenary character assasination. He is not someone whose opinion should be held up.

I'm intimately familiar with his tactics...the type of person that if he said the sky was blue, I'd double check and still have my doubts.

Doesn't mean he's wrong in his case, just not a person I'd use to support my point.
51 posted on 09/24/2003 3:19:32 PM PDT by Cousin Eddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Fred
Ben Stein is a truly bad person...commits mercenary character assasination. He is not someone whose opinion should be held up.

I'm intimately familiar with his tactics...the type of person that if he said the sky was blue, I'd double check and still have my doubts.

Doesn't mean he's wrong in this case, just not a person I'd use to support my point.
52 posted on 09/24/2003 3:21:56 PM PDT by Cousin Eddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MattGarrett
Sabertooth conveniently forgets that McClintock is from Hillary country ... born in New York State. But he chooses to overlook that in his zeal to malign Hewitt as a carpetbagger - even though HH has been here just as long, if not longer, than McClintock.

Sabertooth, who is conveniently a native Californian himself, would like to know exactly where he called Hewitt or anyone else a carpetbagger.

I could, of course, but it would be a cheap shot and wouldn't prove much.

If the gist of my post at the top of this thread wasn't altogether cleaar, let me clarify...

Hugh Hewitt is shilling for Arnold Schwarzenegger, and using selective outrage to make the points he did in his column today.


53 posted on 09/24/2003 4:14:58 PM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Princeliberty
major bump for this post - Arnold is going to look like swiss cheese when Baghdad Bob and Che Torres get thru with him...

Talk about baggage - Arnold is NOT A REPUBLICAN... please see my other posts on this chat..... and for those of you who think you are... please read the platform of the Republican Parties for both CA and national.....

Arnold's is supporting the dem platform and is light years away from the republican platform
54 posted on 09/24/2003 4:24:40 PM PDT by Fred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DManA
I have to laugh at this. Tommy couldn't win in November against a nobody for state-wide office. I was interested in him at the start mostly because of positive impressions I had from his having been praised on "The jerk from San Diego's" show. For those who've been around, you know I'm no fan of our jailbird ex-mayor. However reality is this: if you vote McClintock you better never *ever* speak about Perot voters giving you Bill Clinton. McClintock is a political dinosaur and not just in California. But his politics are so out of step with California that he'll never amount to anything. The right-wing keeps offering its latest "next Ronald Reagan" "Saviors" and one-by-one they fall. Simon was only the latest of these to fall. Against a rightly maligned Davis in 2002.

I can't respect this guy. He trumpets his "20 years" in the legislature which totally disrespects the will of the California voter to term limit their state representatives. It might be legal but he's just a political hack. "Proud" of having never voted for a budget.

He's on a personal vendetta against the party for not feeding him money for his 2002 campaign. He's also "be damned" to step aside for another "unbeatable" celebrity-related candidate like his did for Bob Hope's ultimately defeated son in a congressional race year's ago.

He's no Ronald Reagan and for him to suggest he's even remotely in the same league as that political master is delusional at best.

Wake up to reality. Vote Arnold or vote *NO* on the recall to thwart Cruz's legal coup for a seeming "California 4 Mexico" underworld.

Either vote realistically or get the hell out of California so the Republican party, and the state, can be salvaged by people who can see the writing on the wall.
55 posted on 09/24/2003 4:44:54 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
Nor can anyone, who wants to retain a decent lifestyle in California; a climate where families can raise emotionally healthy children, with good values, ignore the profound issues in the so-called "Culture War."

Thanks for your clear words.

56 posted on 09/24/2003 4:56:55 PM PDT by Afronaut (Vote for me now. I’ll let you know what I believe later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Nice quote digging but that's not been the flavor of the context I've seen Arnold speak about illegal immigration. He opposes the licenses and has vowed to thwart its implementation in many venues.

His view on immigration is that they're here illegally, those who are adding to the tax base should be converted into work visa types to get them documented. He also understands that border control is a federal issue and vows to demand the money California deserves to deal with the mess the Feds have given us. He's dismissed the past amnesty program as a mistake since it only encouraged *bad* behavior (more invaders crossing the border in record droves).

He's for a work visa program, *not* amnesty. He's for legal immigration, for documentation and opposed to driver's licenses for illegals.

My sources include Arnold radio interviews with Sean Hannity, John & Ken (KFI-LA) and Arnold on Larry King Live.

Your distortion of his views does not help your case.
57 posted on 09/24/2003 4:58:53 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
I've seen Arnold speak about illegal immigration,

so he flipped on this also? Changed his mind after a focus group or did Rob Lowe fill in the blanks?

58 posted on 09/24/2003 5:01:44 PM PDT by Afronaut (Vote for me now. I’ll let you know what I believe later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Digger
I'm waiting for them to run Clinton.

I figure they'll wait until '06, though.

59 posted on 09/24/2003 5:02:32 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
He's for a work visa program, *not* amnesty.

Right, and Bill didn't have "sexual relations" with Monica.

Legalizing Illegal Aliens, which Schwarzenegger favors, is Amnesty, and it's dishonest to suggest otherwise.

He's for legal immigration, for documentation and opposed to driver's licenses for illegals.

His own words on this thread indicate Schwarzenegger would give drivers' licenses to the Illegals after they are legalized.

Either way, the same people who entered our country Illegally end up with valid California Drivers' Licenses.

Schwarzenegger's opposition to drivers' licenses for Illegal Aliens is a hollow sham.


60 posted on 09/24/2003 5:09:55 PM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson