Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hugh Hewitt: California recall: One issue, and one issue only
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, September 24, 2003 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 09/24/2003 12:11:47 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

The big debate gets underway at 6:00 p.m. tonight, PST, and the media is working itself into a frenzy. My take is that unless Arnold comes up with the California equivalent of President Ford's declaration of a free Poland in 1976, the debate will be a non-factor in the race.

Oh, it could seal the end of Tom McClintock's career if he tries to land cheap shots on Arnold, and it might scare another few points away from Cruz when he announces his latest lame-brained idea ("We should socialize surfing – all boards the same length, all waves the same height and rides divided up equally, with extra attention paid to people who cannot surf!"). Arianna's desperation is growing more and more repellant, so expect some shrieking from her end of the stage, but generally, a non-event.

But no matter how odd the behavior of the second-tier candidates, or how boring the questions, it just won't matter. There is only one issue that matters to most voters. It absorbs all other issues in this race: The corruption in Sacramento.

The workers' comp mess? It is about the corrupt influence of the trial lawyers. The huge giveaways to prison guards and other public-employee unions? The corrupt influence of big labor. The massive expansion of tribal casinos and the obscene amount of money pouring from the slots into the voting process? The corrupt influence of California's Indian tribes.

Most of this corruption is legal. Most corruption is. But the stench of the decay in Sacramento doesn't diminish because Gray Davis has invented transparency in payoffs. The tribes brazenly gave millions to Cruz who transferred it to an anti-initiative campaign that features, surprise, Cruz. The money-laundering is out in the open, on the front lawn of the State House – but it is no less corrupt.

The tribes pumped huge sums into a pro-McClintock fund. This is legal, but it stinks. It is a manipulation of the electorate – a cynical assist to Cruz via the draining of votes from Arnold. Corrupt? Of course it is. Tom McClintock cannot raise enough money on his own under the $21,200 limit of the law, so he's welcoming the tribes' largesse via an independent expenditure.

Every single interest group lined up to get something from Gray as Gov. Clouseau's career dwindled into its final month. All the hands were stuck out, and Gray walked the line distributing bennies all along the way. Hiram Johnson never imagined corruption on this scale. The Los Angeles Times tut-tuts that the recall is bad for the state. How can anything that smashes the machine up north be bad for the state?

The scale of the collapse of public ethics is so huge that most pundits have given up commenting on it. Tammany is reincarnate. The Davis administration is epic in its fundraising and epic in its deal-making. It is the only thing that will be memorable about Davis – the size of his appetite for cash and the sleaze that was required to feed that appetite.

On Thursday, observers will be dissecting what Arnold said about paid leave or what Cruz said about the car tax. How boring and how beside the point.

This election is about the numbers of people that have a share in Davis, Inc. vs. the rest of us.

I think there are more of us than there are of them and that as a result Arnold wins hands down. Only McClintock can save Cruz at this point. The only interesting question is will he?


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; hughhewitt; mcclintock; recall; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last
To: Reagan Man
It's all about taking Ca. back from a corrupt Admin. Hewett is realistic. I wish you were also.
21 posted on 09/24/2003 12:48:01 AM PDT by stimulate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
In fact, they're threatening to turn against the recall rather than allow the possibility of a victory by Tom.

Source?

22 posted on 09/24/2003 12:48:31 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Hewitt's disdain for McClintock is obvious.
Hewitt's lost all my respect with his BS.

I wonder why? (sarcasm) Could he be part of Arnie's robber baron allies?

Quotes are from the Orange County Register

"Hugh Hewitt, legal counsel to the Building Industry Association Endangered Species Committee" (1991)
"Irvine attorney Hugh Hewitt, who represents many large Southern California land interests" (1992)
"Gov. Wilson appointment of Irvine attorney Hugh Hewitt to the board of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (1995)"
...."Hugh Hewitt, an attorney and co-host of "Life and Times" on KCET-TV, was appointed to the board by Gov. Pete Wilson in May 1995, pending Senate confirmation. But the Senate rules committee voted 3-2 Monday not to confirm Hewitt's appointment. "His record is more pro-industry, at the expense of air quality," said Sandy Harrison, press secretary for committee chairman Sen. Bill Lockyer, D-Hayward. Lockyer also felt that Hewitt was not an air-quality specialist, as called for in state law, and that he had potential conflicts of interest because of his many business clients."(1996)

23 posted on 09/24/2003 12:54:55 AM PDT by calcowgirl (Right Wing Crazy #4052977)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
"Issa, who started recall, now tells voters to reject it"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/987521/posts
24 posted on 09/24/2003 12:55:14 AM PDT by ambrose (Free Tommy Chong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
So Issa is a RINO? Ambrose, he said that if 2 GOP candidates split the vote and allowed Cruz to win, it would be better to stay with Davis. You know that and therefore you are deliberatly playing fast and loose with the facts.
25 posted on 09/24/2003 12:58:57 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ambrose; Roscoe; Lancey Howard; Reagan Man; SteveH
Earlier tonight I wrote this to fporretto who recently wrote in his column of symbols and how powerful their use can be. The following was my observation of how I feel we conservatives are being manhandled by the RINOs at the behest of their corrupt end of the Establishment which just won't let us go. Or, at least, certainly works hard funding trashtalkers like Hewitt to demoralize us right out of our moral stance. I'm fed up, and I bet each of you are too. Does this make sense to you?

What the h*ll can we do about it?

26 posted on 09/24/2003 1:01:48 AM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (You can't see where we're going when you don't look where we've been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Vote "no" on the recall if you can't get enough voters to fall for Arnold's leftist positions?
27 posted on 09/24/2003 1:02:02 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Thanks for exposing the reasons for Hewitt's cronyism. Good info.
28 posted on 09/24/2003 1:04:40 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Vote "no" on the recall if you can't get enough voters to fall for Arnold's leftist positions?

In your wildest dreams, do you think either republican can win if both stay in the race?

29 posted on 09/24/2003 1:06:11 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Just what do these people have against gambling enterprises, run by Indian Tribes?

Perhaps it has to do with competition. Robert Earl, Arnold's partner in various past deals (Planet Hollywood and others) and one of the senior executives of his Inner City Games recently won the Las Vegas bid for the bankrupt Aladdin. The Indians have to be a thorn in their side. Las Vegas mogul Steve Wynn has also supported Arnold's After-school-programs. Tribal gaming has to be reducing their profits.

30 posted on 09/24/2003 1:07:58 AM PDT by calcowgirl (Right Wing Crazy #4052977)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Arnold can drop out if he wants. He isn't running on conservative principles anyway.
31 posted on 09/24/2003 1:08:00 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
And here I thought Republicans wanted to give Gray Davis the boot. Now they want to keep him in office cause Arnold's not pure enough for them. Hey, life is funny when you have $70 million to waste. And look who is a Democrat's best friend!
32 posted on 09/24/2003 1:08:41 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Let's Be Dead Than Electable.
33 posted on 09/24/2003 1:09:22 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Arnold can drop out if he wants. He isn't running on conservative principles anyway.

OK. Arnold drops out. Do you think that McClintock would win?

34 posted on 09/24/2003 1:09:29 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
"Issa, who started recall, now tells voters to reject it"

Issa was on one of the KABC talk shows this evening (Elder or Rantell). He adopted one of Arnold's tactics... He said that he did not mean that... it was an "over the top" comment to get attention. Look for a formal retraction soon.

35 posted on 09/24/2003 1:11:53 AM PDT by calcowgirl (Right Wing Crazy #4052977)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
OK. Arnold drops out.

One less leftist in the race.

36 posted on 09/24/2003 1:13:58 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Maybe it's time to audit Arnold.
37 posted on 09/24/2003 1:15:25 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
One less leftist in the race.

You didn't answer the question. In your heart of hearts, if Arnold drops out will that be enough to elect Tom?

38 posted on 09/24/2003 1:15:33 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Look for a formal retraction soon.

That's nice... but I'm sure Issa's remarks will still find their way in Grayout commercials: "Now even the man who bankrolled this power grab thinks it is a bad idea!" Grayout was beaming today, and heaped praise on Issa, per press reports.

39 posted on 09/24/2003 1:15:33 AM PDT by ambrose (Free Tommy Chong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Now they want to keep him in office cause Arnold's not pure enough for them.

Check again. It's the Arnold supporters pushing a "no" on the recall if their candidate keeps stagnating.

40 posted on 09/24/2003 1:17:49 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson