Skip to comments.
A vote for McClintock is a vote for HER
9.23.03
| Mia T
Posted on 09/23/2003 7:31:33 AM PDT by Mia T
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221-226 next last
To: Grand Old Partisan
Look at the direction Bush has gone. Subtract all the growth in government due to The department of Homeland Security and Defense department and what do you have? Smaller government? No way the government has still gotten bigger and at a faster rate. He hasn't even slowed the pace of Big Government.
How far away from the platform does he have to go before you don't think he is "Republican". Let me see Aunold's positions: Proabort, Pro Gay-union, Pro-giving amnesty to the illegals that are here!. I certainly don't call that conservative though I don't think, now that you mention it, that I can call that "Not-Republican" but that is because the Repubs now take Demorat positions(because they are the only ones the demorat lapdog media says can win).
Ravenstar
61
posted on
09/23/2003 9:38:36 AM PDT
by
Ravenstar
(Reinstitute the Constitution as the Ultimate Law of the Land)
To: Blood of Tyrants
If you want a Democrat to win, then you are a Democrat.
62
posted on
09/23/2003 9:38:41 AM PDT
by
Grand Old Partisan
(You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
To: Grand Old Partisan
You are an expert at double speak. You should read or re-read George Orwells 1984.
Ravenstar
63
posted on
09/23/2003 9:39:56 AM PDT
by
Ravenstar
(Reinstitute the Constitution as the Ultimate Law of the Land)
To: Mia T
I totally agree. A vote for McClintock is a vote to put the Clintonista gang back in power.
64
posted on
09/23/2003 9:43:53 AM PDT
by
Ciexyz
To: tallhappy
Abre los ojos mi gente. Mis ojos estan abiertos. Bustamante must be defeated at all costs. Maria Shriver is the wife, not the candidate. She's window dressing to show that Arnold can work with ("live with") Democrats.
Go Arnie go!
65
posted on
09/23/2003 9:47:07 AM PDT
by
Ciexyz
To: Ravenstar
Supporting a fringe candidate (McClintock) instead of the Republican front-runner (Schwarzenegger) helps the Democrat candidate (Bustamante). It that speaking plain enough for you to understand?
66
posted on
09/23/2003 9:47:37 AM PDT
by
Grand Old Partisan
(You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
To: Ciexyz
Most of these McClintock posters are Democrats trying to divide the Republican vote.
67
posted on
09/23/2003 9:48:50 AM PDT
by
Grand Old Partisan
(You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
To: Mia T
Remember we are running a two
for one special this month. Please
Vote for us. My Metrosexual Husband is
anything you want him to be. Use your
Imagination.
68
posted on
09/23/2003 9:53:28 AM PDT
by
Afronaut
(No convictions must be painless....)
To: Mia T
I agree completely. This recall is a direct assault upon the RAT machine and its prospects in 04. McC must withdraw or else be outed as an egoist without concern for the nation and party.
69
posted on
09/23/2003 9:54:47 AM PDT
by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree. Bush must be destroyed.)
To: Grand Old Partisan
So any truly middle American value makes a person a "fringe" candidate? Where have I heard this before....
......oh yeah its the demorat lapdog media. If by your next post you are inferring that I am a demorat then you have gone off the deep end in your convoluted thinking. It is obvious that you are not a conservative nor a moderate but are left of center in your ideology, or if not your ideology at least in your execution.
Will you be equally shocked and outraged when Auhnold goes socially the same way Grayout Davis is while he is trying to pander for votes?
Ravenstar
70
posted on
09/23/2003 9:57:15 AM PDT
by
Ravenstar
(Reinstitute the Constitution as the Ultimate Law of the Land)
To: Ravenstar
McClintock is a fringe candidate because his support is n=so much lower than Arnold's. As I've stated several times, I would vote for McClintock over Schwarzenegger in a primary, but this is NOT a primary.
71
posted on
09/23/2003 10:01:22 AM PDT
by
Grand Old Partisan
(You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
To: tophat9000
I have post the same factual statements since the imposter showed up. There is no policy issues to debate because Arnold has none. Buffett, the king of murder, is not a problem for them. In fact nothing is a problem except the only conservative in the race.
72
posted on
09/23/2003 10:03:58 AM PDT
by
Afronaut
(No convictions must be painless....)
To: Grand Old Partisan
the Republican front-runner (Schwarzenegger) Is Arnold the front-runner with Republican voters only or just the Republican candidate who is polling the highest among all voters? My guess is that Arnold is drawing a lot of his support from liberal Democrats. Like McCain in 2000, Arnold is trying to win the Republican "primary" by appealing to Democrat voters. Why should conservatives go along with this? One only needs to look to the US Senate to see how well RINO's advance the cause of conservatism.
To: RedBloodedAmerican
That McClintock cannot see this -- or chooses not to -- coupled with his demonstration, in real tiime, of political (as opposed to ideological) rigidity, are a clear illustration of why he should not be the governor of California.Whenever McClintock invokes Reagan, I cannot help but think of Dan Quayle's injudicious JFK analogy....
(So where is the Lloyd-Benson deus ex machina already? . ("I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. But I can tell you one thing, Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy!") It will be poised to go at the debate, I suspect, ready to be lowered onto the stage at the drop of that name.)
74
posted on
09/23/2003 10:06:42 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
To: Grand Old Partisan
You have already said that. Got anything else to add or are you just going to parrot that line? Like why my analysis of the situation is wrong.
75
posted on
09/23/2003 10:06:50 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Mia T
I don't live in CA, but if I did, I'd vote for Arnold Schwarzenegger...
76
posted on
09/23/2003 10:07:36 AM PDT
by
firewalk
To: Blood of Tyrants
I'm not going to spend my days trying to talk sense into the senseless.
77
posted on
09/23/2003 10:09:29 AM PDT
by
Grand Old Partisan
(You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
To: Grand Old Partisan
P.S. I'll be the first to admit that it is much easier for me to say that because I'm not directly affected by the Rats run amok in California. If you are INSIDE California, then it is much harder to let go.
Read Atlas Shrugged.
78
posted on
09/23/2003 10:09:53 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: BibChr
It all really comes down to how Arnie is going to govern. He might swing to the center to get votes and then actually slap down some of the wackiest proposals from Sacramento, but Cali's biggest problem is fixing the state budget. I'd ignore Arnie's moral liberalism if he had a solid plan for fixing the states finances. But it seems like he doesn't.
I don't think Arnie has the cojones to spear the golden calfs of California politics; the teacher's and public sector unions, the trial lawyers, and the environmentalists. Arnie has even said that he won't touch the state education budget. At least McClintock has a plan with regards to the state budget.
I'm also disgusted w/ AS's pro-gun control stance. Mr. Big Tough Guy Action Movie Hero should realize that guns have value and shouldn't be following that whiny wimpy socialist position.
79
posted on
09/23/2003 10:13:53 AM PDT
by
jjm2111
To: Afronaut
I have post the same factual statements since the imposter showed up.Yea I know... but they just get that glased over moonie look
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 221-226 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson