Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The UN's Leninist Legacy
The New American ^ | September 22, 2003

Posted on 09/22/2003 7:17:38 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

Speaking in 1970, former UN Secretary-General U Thant praised founding Soviet dictator Vladimir Lenin and pointedly claimed that Lenin’s ruling philosophy was "in line with the aims of the UN Charter." One of Lenin’s most important concepts was "democratic centralism," that is, the notion that the ruling Soviet elite embodied the democratic will of its subject population, and thus whatever it did was legitimate. In his Foreign Affairs essay (see story above), Tharoor unconsciously acknowledges the UN’s Leninist legacy.

"As the world’s preeminent international organization, the UN embodies world opinion, or at least the world’s legally constituted states," asserts Tharoor. "When the UN Security Council passes a resolution, it is seen as speaking for (and in the interests of) humanity as a whole, and in so doing it confers a legitimacy that is respected by the world’s governments, and usually by their publics. When the resolution in question is passed under Chapter VII of the [UN] charter — that document’s enforcement provisions — it becomes legally binding on all member states."

"The UN guards the vital principles entrenched in its charter, notably the sovereign equality of states and the inadmissibility of interference in their internal affairs," continues Tharoor. Similar claims were made regarding the sovereignty of the so-called Soviet republics ruled by Moscow, as well as the "allies" that composed the Warsaw Pact. And just as in the Soviet Union, the UN assigns to itself the power of deciding when it can intervene in the "sovereign" affairs of any nation.

"It is precisely because the UN is the chief guardian of both these sacrosanct principles that it alone is allowed to approve derogations from them," pontificates Tharoor in an Orwellian mode. "Thus when the UN, in particular the Security Council, legislates an intervention in a sovereign state, it is still seen as upholding the basic principles even while approving a departure from them. When an individual state acts in defiance of the UN, on the other hand, it merely violates these principles."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: legacy; lenin; un; uncharter

1 posted on 09/22/2003 7:17:39 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
We need to get out of the UN NOW!!!!
2 posted on 09/22/2003 7:44:56 PM PDT by MonroeDNA (No longshoremen were injured to produce this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Man, that is ugly.
3 posted on 09/22/2003 8:40:33 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
Republicans in the House favored UN membership 2 to 1 in a recent vote on a bill sponsored by Ron Paul to end UN membership.

Republicans are first and foremost responsible for our continued UN membership.

4 posted on 09/22/2003 8:52:14 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
:

:

5 posted on 09/23/2003 12:51:22 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ppaul

6 posted on 09/23/2003 1:33:18 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe (Only UN-Americans put the UN before America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson