To: KQQL
That is F*^*&ing RIDICULOUS!
Clark does NOT HAVE THE NAME ID to beat Bush like that!
Same with most of the other candidates like Kerry and Dean.
WashPost/ABC news has GWB43 beating all of his opponents by double digits.
6 posted on
09/22/2003 5:29:51 PM PDT by
Pubbie
("Last time I checked, he doesn't have a vote" - Tom DeLay on Ari Fleischer's demand for Tax-Rebates)
To: Pubbie
WP is/was pro War, Cnn and Newsweek are not....lol
9 posted on
09/22/2003 5:32:37 PM PDT by
KQQL
(^@__*^)
To: Pubbie
Yes sir, Bush is vunerable in the same sense that the Rats were ready to pick up 40 seats in 2002.
To: Pubbie
Clark does NOT HAVE THE NAME ID to beat Bush like that! Maybe, maybe not.
One thing we better start doing is to realize that Bush COULD lose the election. That would be a disaster, but do not underestimate the Dims, or how easy it is to sway the general population. We cannot take anything for granted when it comes to dealing with libs. Even if polls showed W ahead by 30 points, you work even harder to keep the momentum up. You do not relax!
A few months ago Rush said "it's over for the Democratic party". I immediately thought that was a foolish and stupid thing to say.
I hope Bush has something(s) up his sleeve and is just letting the Dims get bold.
I hope!
To: Pubbie
That is right on. There is no effing way Clark would be ahead of Bush. I have been highly suspicious of these polls coming out lately that show Bush in a total free fall. Almost every single one of them is a liberal biased poll.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson