You are invited to explain what you imagine would have to have been "magic" about shot #2. Note: If you're wise, you won't use the terms "pristine" or "right-angle turn", as both are incredibly easy to debunk and will only make you look foolishly unaware of the facts you're attempting to opine about. Go for it.
You are invited to explain what you imagine would have to have been "magic" about shot #2.
Post your evidence that shot #2 was the bullet that went through JFK & Connelly, then was found at Parkland.. - Virtually undamaged. -- Go for it.
Note: If you're wise, you won't use the terms "pristine" or "right-angle turn", as both are incredibly easy to debunk and will only make you look foolishly unaware of the facts you're attempting to opine about.
Your dogmatic bit about the terms "pristine" or "right-angle turn" only make you look foolish..
Go for it.
Your turn.