Skip to comments.Islam: A Religion of Conquest
Posted on 09/22/2003 8:51:23 AM PDT by Vindiciae Contra TyrannoSCOTUS
New Book Onward Muslim Soldiers Exposes Muhammads True Believers
Islam is a religion of peace. Strangely enough, that is a political article of faith that no one has been allowed to question publicly since Islamic terrorists killed thousands in attacks on New York and Washington two years ago.
Despite having this idea constantly pounded into their heads by network anchormen, U.S. government officials and even Pope John Paul II, millions of Americans are not so sure that Islam is peaceful at all. Certainly if one surveys the Islamic world, from the Middle East to South and Southeast Asia, it is obvious that pro-Western Muslim countries such as Malaysia, Qatar and Turkey have been more secular, and thus less religious. Wellsprings of terrorsuch as Saudi Arabia, Iran and Pakistanare more fundamentalist. But which interpreters of the faith hold the right to claim they are living by the true spirit of the Koran?
In his new book, Onward Muslim Soldiers: How Jihad Still Threatens America and the West (published by Regnery, a sister company of HUMAN EVENTS), Robert Spencer makes a compelling argument that the jihadists are the true successors to the religion founded by Muhammad 14 centuries ago. Mr. Spencer quotes extensively from the prophet himself to undermine the notion that he peddled pacifism like some ancient Arabic Gandhi.
"Paradise," said Muhammad, "is under the shades of swords." One of Osama bin Ladens favorite verses from the Koran explicitly lays out the raison detre of jihad: "Slay the idolaters [unbelievers] wherever you find them." This call to arms allows little room for modern-day apologists who argue that terrorists misinterpret the Koran for their own purposes.
Countless other myths are demolished in Onward Muslim Soldiers. For example, Islam was never a religion of tolerance. Muhammad himself called Jews "you brothers of monkeys" to their faces. The traditional three options that Muslim armies gave their opponents before battle were to convert to Islam, agree to accept Islamic law and dominion, or be killed.
It was accepted practice that Muslims had a right to the property of non-Muslims, and that Muslims could kidnap the wives of unbelievers and make them concubines. Enslaving Jews and Christians was considered a merciful alternative to execution. Through murder and coercion, Islam was successful in extinguishing all other religions from Arabia in a short period of time.
Islam was never peaceful, but rather was based on conquest from the beginning. During his life, Muhammad commanded 27 battles, and his troops were ruthless. After one victory over the hated infidel, Muhammad had the defeated massacred and ordered that their 600 to 900 heads be delivered to him.
Atrocities of this sort were common at the hands of Muhammads forces. According to the author, none of these were defensive wars necessary to protect a fledgling religion. Rather, the goal was to plunder foreign lands for economic gain and to acquire lebensraum, or living space. The marauders were astonishingly successful.
As Mr. Spencer writes: "Before the prophet had been dead ten years, Muslim armies had taken Syria, Egypt and Persia. Muslim armies conquered Damascus in 635...; substantial portions of Iraq in 636; Jerusalem in 638; Caesarea in 641; and Armenia in 643 . . . By 709, they had complete control of North Africa; by 711 they had subdued Spain and were moving into France . . . Muslim forces first besieged... Constantinople for a full year starting in August 716; Sicily fell in 827. By 846 Rome was in danger of being captured by Muslim invaders."
Could this invasion be happening again? Muslims are emigrating into Western countries by the millions, and it is taught even in moderate mosques that no non-Muslim has the right to rule over Muslims.
Mr. Spencer writes that many contemporary Muslims "see their goal as nothing less than the establishment of Islamic states in Europe." Archbishop Giuseppe Bernardini reports being told by a Muslim leader that, "Thanks to your democratic laws, we will invade you. Thanks to our religious laws, we will dominate you."
The demographic trends are not promising. Europeans are not having enough babies to sustain the population, while Muslim immigrants are having large families. Meanwhile, the Saudis have spent billions to fund the worldwide construction of mosques and schools with radical jihadist affiliations. The author quotes young British Muslims who look at suicide bombers as heroes and role models, with one enthusiastic lad warning that, "To be a martyr in our religion is a great honor. Its only a matter of time before someone blows themselves up in this country."
Suicide bombers and the targeting of innocents by terrorists are traditional means of Islamic warfare. Said Muhammad: "Soon shall we cast terror into the hearts of the unbelievers their abode will be the fire."
This tradition is alive and well, and gradually spreading across the globe. Without a doubt, the jihadist onslaught must be fought. But can a passive, neo-pagan West come together and be strong enough to successfully take on an invigorated, radicalized Islam? The case is easily made that the rich, industrialized countries of the world are too corrupt, too rotten anddare we saytoo liberal to take a stand for the values that built a successful society.
The scandalous fact that Westerners wont even admit what or who the enemy is serves as a bad omen for defeat. It is not possible to fight what political correctness prohibits anyone from defining. Like it or not, the threat comes from orthodox Islam. Jihadists are the enemy. Those who claim that jihad is misunderstood are making excuses for terror. Expansionist Muslims view the struggle between Islam and the West as a religious war. We deny this reality at our own peril.
Robert Spencer has written a radical book about a radical religion. The most useful information in Onward Muslim Soldiers is the insight into the blood-soaked history of Islamic fundamentalism. Until it is confronted seriously, the tradition will continueand it is coming to a town square or shopping mall near you.
Mr. Decker, a 2003 Phillips Foundation fellow, is a member of the Washington Times editorial board.
If I lived on another planet it would be amusing to observe this. While the determinedly unassimilated Muslims take over Europe and breeding like sand bunnies on the European dole, the European multi-culteralists are still loudly singing the happy song. And the U.S. isn't any better, we're just not as accessible as Europe for the new Muslim invasion.
We didn't close our borders.
Even though each attacker in the 9-11 terrorist attacks was born outside America, we ... did ... nothing.
Our answer was to control all citizens.
We didn't racially profile right up until the day that our Constitution and Bill of Rights were discarded outright.
Don't blame anyone but your fellow Americans who tolerated liberal media.
That's why Bush is going to deliver this nation into destruction.
Muslims believe to die in jihad is instant passage into paradise. Unlike non-martyres their is no final judgement so why not live it up while you can.
Not necesssarily so. Soldiers are allowed all the broads on the side that they want. Mohammedism provides for three-day marriages so the screwing around will not be adultery.
If you are a muslim leaving the religion is a death sentence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.