Skip to comments.
“Tom Can’t Win”? Wrong – Do the Math – Silent Switch Makes McClintock Governor
9-22-03
Posted on 09/22/2003 7:28:24 AM PDT by tallhappy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 361-362 next last
To: PhiKapMom
Cruz is better than Arnold! No. Didn't say that.
I said long term damage is greater if Schwarzenegger is elected.
I am sure Schwarzenegger would do a better immediate job on certain issues.
This has nothing to do with ability or competence but is about the direction taken in our nation and in the Republican party.
To: PhiKapMom
I'm assuming this was meant for tallhappy........
~</;o)
162
posted on
09/22/2003 9:58:43 AM PDT
by
EggsAckley
(..........I *LOVE* hitting the abuse button...............)
To: tallhappy
But what did Arnold say -- this is throwing around innuendoes about what might happen!
This is where I am really disappointed at what I am seeing out of some conservatives -- actually making up what might/could happen when there are plenty of issues out there to talk about.
I don't understand the reasoning except to tank a fellow Republican but instead it has made McC look nasty! Either McC is calling the shots or he is getting bad advice. He should have reached out to the others who dropped from the race to unite with him but instead he went on to attack a fellow Republican instead of Cruz.
Now you have the conservatives in the CA delegation firmly in Arnold's corner -- why don't you ask yourself why? I just heard Rohrbacher discuss the "purist" who are beating their chest without a chance a to win. I agree with him after being on here.
McC missed a real opportunity to make a difference by his campaign tactics and I find that sad!
163
posted on
09/22/2003 9:59:16 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Alpha Omnicron Pi Mom too! -- Visit http://www.georgewbush.com!)
To: Republic Rocker
And I will hold the likes of you responsible Happy Tall one It's not his fault. Arnold didn't EARN his vote. I thought republicans did not support entitlements.
164
posted on
09/22/2003 10:00:37 AM PDT
by
Dan from Michigan
(There are two things in the middle of the road. Roadkill, and a yellow stripe.)
To: EggsAckley
Thanks -- wrong person!
165
posted on
09/22/2003 10:01:40 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Alpha Omnicron Pi Mom too! -- Visit http://www.georgewbush.com!)
To: tallhappy
The main flaw in this analysis is that it assumes 60% of Arnold's supporters vote for McClintock, but zero percent vote for Busty.
To: Iris7
And Clinton makes five.
167
posted on
09/22/2003 10:05:41 AM PDT
by
b9
To: tallhappy
Why assume that Arnold's supporters would automatically switch to McClintock? McC has proven that while good on the issues, he's a lackluster nothing who doesn't have the leadership qualities to be a decent Governor.
168
posted on
09/22/2003 10:06:11 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
("I'm the party pooper..." -- Arnold in "Kindergarten Cop.")
To: Scott from the Left Coast; EggsAckley; PhiKapMom
ROFL!!!
In that case, though, Tom is REALLY sunk... I bet the Wiccans are hoarding all the eye-of-newt for Cruz ;-)
169
posted on
09/22/2003 10:06:16 AM PDT
by
Tamzee
("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
To: tallhappy
Do you understand what a Cruz victory is really going to do to the Conservative movement in California? Think about it -- Arnold loses and Cruz is elected for one reason -- McClintock, a conservative, played the role of spoiler.
How many Republicans in California are now going to give McC a seat at the table ever again? Even conservatives like Rohrbacher are starting to question the "purist" conservatives agenda.
You folks in the McC camp alone will be responsible for the demise of conservatism in CA if Cruz is elected. Arnold is a concensus builder and will reach out which CA needs. With a Republican in the Governor's Chair, it should make it easier to get more Republicans elected when the people of California see that Arnold is helping fix the CA economy so why not elect people to help him.
Think some of you have totally misjudged what CA is today versus when Pres Reagan was Governor. A win for Cruz will crush the conservatives in the CA Republican Party and the Republican conservatives in office today except for McC and a few realize it. Shame more of you don't!
170
posted on
09/22/2003 10:07:37 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Alpha Omnicron Pi Mom too! -- Visit http://www.georgewbush.com!)
To: tallhappy
I was thinking of "detrimental to California" in the sense that you used it in your sentence. I was thinking of the results of this election, being detrimental to what you love, and to Feinstein et al. agreeing with that statement, i.e., that the results would be detrimental to what you love. I saw an implied "detrimental to (the) California (that I love)" in your statement. I should have been more explicit.
171
posted on
09/22/2003 10:07:48 AM PDT
by
Iris7
To: doodlelady
"What are you talking about?" God replies....
""I sent you two boats and a helicopter!"
***
I love the analogy, this very same one has crossed my mind so often these last few weeks :-)
172
posted on
09/22/2003 10:10:27 AM PDT
by
Tamzee
("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
To: tallhappy
I think Tom should explain some of his actions lately before any conservative should vote for him. In the meantime, I'm voting for Arnold.
173
posted on
09/22/2003 10:13:21 AM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(I'm voting for Arnold. McClintock doesn't deserve my vote!)
To: Fred Mertz
The main flaw in this analysis is that it assumes 60% of Arnold's supporters vote for McClintock, but zero percent vote for Busty. BINGO! This seems to be the main flaw that all TomBots employ when say when they think Tom has a chance.
174
posted on
09/22/2003 10:15:03 AM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(I'm voting for Arnold. McClintock doesn't deserve my vote!)
To: SteveH
What strategis mistakes? I am sure that Arnold has made many but this wasn't one:
Arnold is now three days from a debate he undoubtedly has hoped to avoid at all costs. I can imagine his advisors assuring him early in the campaign that he would never be placed in this position.Arnold decided early he could only do one debate, and chose the one which would give the most impact. The one he chose is not as scripted as everyone thinks, since other candidates can ask questions and so on.
175
posted on
09/22/2003 10:17:04 AM PDT
by
NathanR
(California Si! Aztlan NO!)
To: Owen
Winning matters, but only when you have not abandoned principle. A win which sacrifices principles is in fact, a loss.
176
posted on
09/22/2003 10:19:18 AM PDT
by
SteveH
((Californians for, like, you know, Moon Unit!!!))
To: SteveH
Look at #158, which is not mine.
What the "McClintock" faction is doing is further marginalizing the Right, both in California, nationally, and in Wisconsin. If Bustamante wins because the Right acts as spoiler in California, the Right will be excluded from politics to an even greater extent than we have seen so far. This would be a serious defeat for all of us. This "McClintock" business plays right into the hand of the Left. This is so completely obvious it makes one wonder about the "McClintock" factions motives and/or sanity. Hyperbole aside, it makes me wonder about their good faith.
177
posted on
09/22/2003 10:19:46 AM PDT
by
Iris7
To: tallhappy
An intriguing argument.
However, factor for some or all of the remaining 40% going to Bustamante.....I guess.
The numbers would look different, then
To: NathanR
What strategis mistakes? I am sure that Arnold has made many but this wasn't one: I mean, a debate with Tom on stage to permit apples to apples comparison by the voting public. And that I think it likely that Arnold's handlers had not forecast this possibility in advance during the early planning stages of the Arnold campaign. Now they're stuck.
179
posted on
09/22/2003 10:21:59 AM PDT
by
SteveH
((Californians for, like, you know, Moon Unit!!!))
To: SteveH
I said "look at post #158" but am wrong, please see post #170.
180
posted on
09/22/2003 10:24:38 AM PDT
by
Iris7
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 361-362 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson