Skip to comments.
McClintock talk draws 350 loyal Republicans
OC Register.com ^
| 9/21/03
| MARTIN WISCKOL
Posted on 09/21/2003 7:47:36 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/14/2004 10:06:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Voters, not worried that he may split the vote, stand by principles rather than desire to win.
CORONA DEL MAR
(Excerpt) Read more at 2.ocregister.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; draws; mcclintock; recall; supporters; talk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: William Creel
I think we should avoid such articles for a few days.You don't know me very well, do you. Go, McClintock! www.helptom.com
41
posted on
09/21/2003 9:23:41 PM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: Roscoe
"And the fraud pretends to be a fiscal conservative."
I wish you wouldn't talk about Tom that way...
42
posted on
09/21/2003 9:25:21 PM PDT
by
RS
(nc)
To: CheneyChick
*rotfl*
43
posted on
09/21/2003 9:26:27 PM PDT
by
LisaAnne
To: NormsRevenge
Letter to the Editor in today's Fresno Bee:
'Not at that price'
By Christopher G. Tasy
Sanger
(Published Sunday, September 21, 2003, 5:49 AM)
The so-called Republicans who are supporting Arnold Schwarzenegger for governor are near-sighted: They see only the economic side of the equation while trying so desperately to "win" (if the recall is even allowed to happen).
Republicans in California are selling their soul attempting to beat Gray Davis and the Democrats while forgetting the party stands for more than mere economics.
"But don't you want to win?" is a common sentiment of many California Republicans. My answer: "Not at that price." The heart of Republicans may belong to economics, but its soul belongs to the Judeo-Christian concept of right-and-wrong. It's a symbiotic relationship that, if split, dilutes what makes it such a strong alternative to the Democrats and Greens. Because Mr. Schwarzenegger is pro-abortion and seeks to legitimize homosexuality, the underlying effect is to undermine the family in favor of a purely secular state, devoid of Judeo-Christian values. I, for one, cannot and will not vote for such an individual.
State Sen. Tom McClintock, on the other hand, has delineated his views in favor of the family -- both economic and moral -- and will get my vote.
To make a purely economic choice for governor is akin to voting for someone who may create an economic powerhouse while ignoring where he stands on the right to life.
Mr. Schwarzenegger (plus Gov. Davis and Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante) believe killing children is permissible, all the while trumpeting the great economy. So did Hitler, Stalin and Mao.
44
posted on
09/21/2003 9:26:34 PM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: NormsRevenge
McClintock, a longtime state legislator from Thousand Oaks, has paid the cost for standing by his beliefs before, such as when he and a handful of others opposed the budgets of then-Gov. Pete Wilson, a fellow Republican, in the 1990s - and saw the leadership appointments and campaign assistance from GOP chiefs evaporate And that is exactly what will happen to any Republicans in the Assembly or Senate who fight Arnold on tax increases.
The only people who have been stopping tax increases (republicans who won't give the two-thirds vote necessary for tax increases) will be threatened with their political lives for fighting Arnold's tax increases, JUST AS TOM McCLINTOCK HAS BEEN ON THIS FORUM FOR NOT BOWING OUT OF THE RACE!!!
See if this sounds familiar:
"Tom's done in politics if he doesn't get out of the race now"
"If he fights them on this, he's unelectable next time"
"Tom can kiss his political career goodbye!"
Look back through the forum folks, see who's been saying these things, and judge their post accordingly.
Hb
45
posted on
09/21/2003 9:26:42 PM PDT
by
Hoverbug
(whadda ya mean, "we don't get parachutes"!?!)
To: Hoverbug
All you Arnie-bots tell me again how McClintock will be supported for U.S. Senator if he just steps down now.Too late.
46
posted on
09/21/2003 9:31:55 PM PDT
by
PRND21
To: South40
"350? WOW!"
Laugh all you want, but, just remember, the arrogance you and the other Arnold "supporters" or should I say, ANTI-Buster supporteres of Arnold are pushing those of us who SUPPORT Mc further and further away from your small r dem clones and that includes Arnold. Some of you pulled the same kind of crap when Simon ran against riordan.
Thanks for the motivation.
47
posted on
09/21/2003 9:35:45 PM PDT
by
poet
To: PRND21
Here's one now.
Hb
48
posted on
09/21/2003 9:36:47 PM PDT
by
Hoverbug
(whadda ya mean, "we don't get parachutes"!?!)
To: ServesURight
"Principles Over Politics" Right. How would they feel if they knew he skipped out on the Senate vote for the Domestic Partners Bill to go solicit the Indian Gaming people. August 28, 2003
To: RS
Worship your socialist celebrity.
50
posted on
09/21/2003 9:37:28 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Saundra Duffy
Brava!
Couldn't have said it better myself.
51
posted on
09/21/2003 9:38:28 PM PDT
by
poet
To: thoughtomator
"Name one way a government can "make sure" of anything without spending money to do it."
Gee - I wonder how they just legislate a minimum wage ?
and I suppose if I mention Tax breaks you will just say that a tax break COSTS money
Or just tell all the welfare Moms that they can earn as much as they want up to a certain number of hours a week working at a private day care center without effecting their payment.
... and drop most of the regulations and the minimum wage laws so that the centers can offer their services at affordable rates.
52
posted on
09/21/2003 9:40:55 PM PDT
by
RS
(nc)
To: Saundra Duffy
They see only the economic side of the equation while trying so desperately to "win" Even then, they see only a mirage.
53
posted on
09/21/2003 9:41:55 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
"Worship your socialist celebrity."
I suppose Jesus was a socialist, wasn't he ?
54
posted on
09/21/2003 9:43:43 PM PDT
by
RS
(nc)
To: RS
I suppose Jesus was a socialist, wasn't he ? Thanks for the look inside your soul.
55
posted on
09/21/2003 9:47:46 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: RGSpincich
56
posted on
09/21/2003 9:48:04 PM PDT
by
Hoverbug
(whadda ya mean, "we don't get parachutes"!?!)
To: Hoverbug
Mote/beam.
57
posted on
09/21/2003 9:49:45 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
"I suppose Jesus was a socialist, wasn't he ?
Thanks for the look inside your soul."
I wonder why you keep bringing this personal ?
Are you so weak in support of your "principles" that you think you can do better to attack the person rather then the ideas ?
58
posted on
09/21/2003 9:51:29 PM PDT
by
RS
(nc)
To: Hoverbug
including your admission that his vote would have made no difference You've got a screw lose.
To: Hoverbug
Toast.
60
posted on
09/21/2003 9:51:49 PM PDT
by
PRND21
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson