Replies

I called Ms. Melone and talked to her in a rational
but with a little emotion of how I was appalled at
her article, etc. and how I don't have an agenda but
that I am concerned for what is happening to Terri,
that her "husband" does not have her best interests
at heart, how the facts of the case bear out the
criminal nature of his acts, etc. She asked me if
the Judges in the case who have consistently ruled
for Mr. Schiavo could possibly be wrong. I said that
Mr. Greer is playing games and even got the Sheriff
to lie for him, etc. and has done other things that
indicate that he is not looking out for Terri's best interests. She said that you can call the editor etc.
and about the internet and I told her that I am
very active on the internet so I know what to do but
that I wanted her to know that I was appalled by what
she wrote and that perhaps she should take a look at
the facts of the case. She was saying she respects the judicial process. I just told her about Michael etc.
and how after the malpractice lawsuit 3 years later he just remembers after winning all the money that Terri wouldn't want to live on life support or "artificially"
to show that he obviously has criminal intentions. She asked then why the judges threw it out, etc. who presided over the proceedings, etc. Anywayz I ended telling her about getting the facts and that I just had to call to tell her how appalled I was.