Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New California Field Poll leaked
Field Poll | September 20, 2003 | Field Poll

Posted on 09/20/2003 3:21:43 PM PDT by carbon14

Recall (yes)...53%

Bustamante.....28% Schwarzenegger.26% MadClintock....14%

For comparison (Field Poll August 18) Bustamante.....25% Schwarzenegger.22% MadClintock.....9% Simon...........8% Ueberroth.......5% Huffington......2%


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: california; fieldpoll; mcclintock; polls; recall; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-399 next last
To: Mark Felton
Schwarznegger dwarfs McClintock in proven leadership skills. It's the values that count, and the ability to drive those values into the system from the top down. Being a competent bureaucrat is not a positive reason to elect a politician.
Are you serious? What are the proven leadership skills?
Values? Using other people to excel in movies and body-building? We have already seen in the past 24 hours that after blasting McClintock for taking money from special interests, he has taken money from a multi-millionaire in tax trouble, after swearing against doing this. Is this a value we should applaud?
McClintock a beauracrat? He is an elected Republican legislator in a state full of Democrats, ran on conservative principles and fought for them in the assembly. What has Ahnold done to equal that? Promoted an tax-heavy after school proposal that hasn't yet been implemented because there is no money for it and would be cut from the budget by a conservative anyway?
I cannot see where you are coming from.
--Raoul
41 posted on 09/20/2003 3:44:53 PM PDT by RDangerfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
because it will break the back of the Dem political machine in california. He's not going to be governor for life, his election offers an opportunity for a victory, something to build on in an otherwise solidly Dem state. And considering the alternative is the election of a racist and corrupt Dem, why not take a chance?
42 posted on 09/20/2003 3:45:28 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Republicans should get behind Arnold for when you put every one's votes together, he can beat Large Breasts hands down.

Did you toss a coin or what? Why didin't you say Republicans should get behind Bustamante in order to beat Arnold. I can't understand how one liberal is better than another.

Republicans should get behind McClintock because his views more reflect the Republican platform, while the other two yoyos hold views similar to the Democrat platform.

43 posted on 09/20/2003 3:45:31 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (It's time for Arnold to stop splitting the Republican vote and step aside for the good of the party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: carbon14
FYI... This is a Public Research Institute poll not a Field Poll.
44 posted on 09/20/2003 3:45:38 PM PDT by GrandmaPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle
did you even read it? Says "Field Poll" in the first paragraph
45 posted on 09/20/2003 3:46:19 PM PDT by ambrose (Free Tommy Chong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: South40
You're very welcome! Did you read strela calling Tom Tom "McWampum"? I haven't laughed so hard in years!

Thanks for all the pix, BTW.
46 posted on 09/20/2003 3:46:35 PM PDT by annyokie (One good thing about being wrong is the joy it brings to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: carbon14
Simple math and freshman stats skills are all that are needed to see that McClintock, a fine man with a great record, simply cannot win this race.

While it is a reasonable leap of logic to say that among McClintock supporters, if he dropped out and urged support for A.S. that A.S. would likely win with a strong margin, perhaps even a clear majority, the reverse is simply not true. A.S. has many supporters in the independent and crossover camps who will simply not be pursuaded to vote for McClintock, even if A.S. begged them personally.

Personal note: those among us who see the world for what it is and are willing to accept the situation and endeavor to do our best within the constraints of the world as it truly exists are not charlatans, turn coats, RINOs, neo-cons, carpet-baggers, or willing accomplices of the Devil himself ... we are simply political realists who believe that having an (R) in the Govs mansion is important, and that to do that we need a candidate who can get crossover votes because the fact remains that there are a LOT more (D)s out here than (R)s ... that may mean that the best and most electable candidate is not the most 'ideologically pure' candidate ... but if you would rather have us suffer the same fate again and lose the opportunity to make judicial appontiments, lose the opportunity to grasp the veto pen, lose the opportunity to campaign for more local reps, and lose the bully pulpit ... then fine, lead and vote with your 'conscience' intact, and sleep well after Cruz takes the oath of office knowing that you helped elect him...

47 posted on 09/20/2003 3:47:31 PM PDT by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Arnold has no credibility on conservative issues and for good reason. Arnold is a liberal. Arnold is opposed to most of the 2000 GOP party platform and for good reason. Arnold is a RINO. And what leadership abilities does Arnold have in government? None. Zero. Zilch. Zippo. Nada.

On July 27,2003, the BRAC decision was passed through the Cal Senate, 36-0. This was legislation advanced by Tom McClintock, which will reduce "identify, downsize or eliminate obsolete state bureaucracies". A very conservative piece of legislation and in keeping with the GOP agenda.

If you want a Hollywood liberal and political empty suit, to be the next governor of California, vote for Arnold. If you want the best qualified man to become governor of California, vote for Tom McClintock.

48 posted on 09/20/2003 3:47:35 PM PDT by Reagan Man (The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: carbon14
I can't see what all this fuss is about anymore.

The recall was STRUCK DOWN by a Federal court. THERE IS NO RECALL!

49 posted on 09/20/2003 3:48:15 PM PDT by Old Sarge (Serving You... on Operation Noble Eagle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Arnold doesn't share too many conservative values. What point is there for a conservative to back him?

Ask the thousands of conservatives who already do.

50 posted on 09/20/2003 3:48:21 PM PDT by cyncooper (I believe VP Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ambrose; GrandmaPatriot
**did you even read it? Says "Field Poll" in the first paragraph**

No need to get testy, ambrose. I'm merely asking exactly who conducted the poll...there are a number of generic field polls. Further, GrandmaPatriot said this is not a field poll.

51 posted on 09/20/2003 3:48:32 PM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: ambrose
from post #44: **FYI... This is a Public Research Institute poll not a Field Poll.
**
53 posted on 09/20/2003 3:49:28 PM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
FYI 9 percent to 14 percent represents a 56% increase in support

Arnold seems to attract math impaired supporters.

54 posted on 09/20/2003 3:50:37 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
If Bustamonte wins this election, the California conservatives deserve what they get. Yes Arnold is a liberal, a traditional liberal, but at least he's not a Socialist. Sometimes you have to take what you can get, and if you don't, you deserve the booby prize.
55 posted on 09/20/2003 3:51:11 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RDangerfield
When did A.S. say that he would not take any money? He never swore to run on his own $$, he stated he would not be bought by special interests. There is a difference. Your leap of logic has been bridged by media reporting and not by reasoned analysis of anything the man has actually said.
56 posted on 09/20/2003 3:51:27 PM PDT by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
The recall was STRUCK DOWN by a Federal court. THERE IS NO RECALL!

NEWS FLASH: The decision striking down the recall is no more. It was rendered a "nullity" when the 9th granted en banc review.

57 posted on 09/20/2003 3:51:28 PM PDT by ambrose (Free Tommy Chong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GrandmaPatriot
Oops

Public Research Institute = Public Policy Institute

58 posted on 09/20/2003 3:52:10 PM PDT by GrandmaPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle
http://field.com/fieldpoll/

It is definitely a different poll.
59 posted on 09/20/2003 3:53:02 PM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: GrandmaPatriot
**Public Policy Institute **

Can you offer some insight about Public Policy Instiute? Thank you.

60 posted on 09/20/2003 3:53:08 PM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-399 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson