Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clark Says He Would Have Voted for War(Clark wants to cut military)
NY Times ^ | 9/19/03 | ADAM NAGOURNEY

Posted on 09/19/2003 9:14:29 AM PDT by finnman69

September 19, 2003

Clark Says He Would Have Voted for War By ADAM NAGOURNEY


FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla., Sept. 18 — Gen. Wesley K. Clark said today that he would have supported the Congressional resolution that authorized the United States to invade Iraq, even as he presented himself as one of the sharpest critics of the war effort in the Democratic presidential race.

General Clark also said in an interview that he would probably oppose President Bush's request for $87 billion to finance the recovery effort in Iraq, though he said he could see circumstances in which he might support sending even more money into the country.

On both the question of the initial authorization and the latest request for financing, General Clark said he was conflicted. He offered the case on both sides of the argument, as he appeared to struggle to stake out positions on issues that have bedeviled four members of Congress who supported the war and are now seeking the Democratic presidential nomination.

General Clark said that he would have advised members of Congress to support the authorization of war but that he thought it should have had a provision requiring President Bush to return to Congress before actually invading. Democrats sought that provision without success.

"At the time, I probably would have voted for it, but I think that's too simple a question," General Clark said.

A moment later, he said: "I don't know if I would have or not. I've said it both ways because when you get into this, what happens is you have to put yourself in a position — on balance, I probably would have voted for it."

Moving to fill in the blanks of his candidacy a day after he announced for president, General Clark also said that he had been a Republican who had turned Democratic after listening to the early campaign appeals of a fellow Arkansan, Bill Clinton.

Indeed, after caustically comparing the actions of the Bush administration to what he described as the abuses of Richard M. Nixon, he said that he voted for Mr. Nixon in 1972. He also said he had voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 1984.

The general's remarks in a free-rolling 90-minute airborne interview suggested the extent of the adjustment he faces in becoming a presidential candidate.

"Mary, help!" he called to his press secretary, Mary Jacoby, at the front of the plane, as he faced questions about Iraq. "Come back and listen to this."

At one point, Ms. Jacoby interrupted the interview, which included four reporters who were traveling on the general's jet, to make certain that General Clark's views on the original Iraq resolution were clear.

"I want to clarify — we're moving quickly here," Ms. Jacoby said. "You said you would have voted for the resolution as leverage for a U.N.-based solution."

"Right," General Clark responded. "Exactly."

General Clark said he saw his position on the war as closer to that of members of Congress who supported the resolution — Representative Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri and Senators Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, John Kerry of Massachusetts and John Edwards of North Carolina — than that of Howard Dean, the former Vermont governor who has been the leading antiwar candidate in the race.

Still, asked about Dr. Dean's criticism of the war, General Clark responded: "I think he's right. That in retrospect we should never have gone in there. I didn't want to go in there either. But on the other hand, he wasn't inside the bubble of those who were exposed to the information."

And at a brief stop at a delicatessen on a trip here to raise money, his very first campaign appearances, he lashed into Mr. Bush's war effort with language that was easily as tough as any that Dr. Dean has used in presenting himself as the antiwar candidate.

"We are going to ask, `Why are we engaged in Iraq, Mr. President — tell the truth,' " he said, standing on a chair. "Why, Mr. President? Was it because Saddam Hussein was assisting the hijackers? Was it because Saddam Hussein had a nuclear weapon that might bring a nuclear cloud?"

The crowd shouted back answers. "Oil!" one person yelled. "Halliburton!" yelled another.

General Clark said: "We don't know. And that's the truth. And we have to ask that question."

On the plane, General Clark also said he might support changing the "don't ask, don't tell" policy governing the presence of gay men and lesbians in the military.

"I'd like to see the military relook the policy," he said. "I didn't say change it — I said relook it."

For example, General Clark said, the military might examine adopting a "don't ask, don't misbehave" policy patterned after one that he said was in place in Britain. Asked what the "don't misbehave" standard meant, the general responded, "I'm not going to set a policy with you winging it in the back of an airplane."

General Clark said his domestic priorities would include health insurance and rolling back parts of Mr. Bush's tax cuts. "I don't see why we can't have health insurance for every single American," he said. Asked how he would pay for it, General Clark said he was open to some cuts in the budget he is more familiar with — the Pentagon's. "The armed forces are a want machine," he said. "They are structured to develop want."

General Clark said he had enjoyed a visit to New Hampshire over the summer that he said signaled to him how much he would like campaigning. He compared meeting New Hampshire voters to his work as the NATO commander.

"It's like what we did in the military when we went to the motor pool and talked to the troops — only better," he said.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004; clark; hillarycare; military; wesleyclark
Wesley Clark wants to pay for HillaryCare by cutting the defense budget:
1 posted on 09/19/2003 9:14:30 AM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Wesley Clark wants to pay for HillaryCare by cutting the defense budget:

Sshh.. That'll go over fantastic with the Dem primary crowd...

2 posted on 09/19/2003 9:33:00 AM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Wesely Clinton for President? Cut military and enact national health care? How much medical help/expense will be needed if our military can't defend this country? I thinks its cheeper to kill thems there than for thems to kills us here.
3 posted on 09/19/2003 9:36:28 AM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
He said he would have voted to go into Iraq. Then he said he wouldn't. Then he said he would to lead to a U.N. backed resolution (which we had, by the way). Then, when talking about Dean he said, "I didn't want to go in either." This guy's going hurting himself if he keeps falling off both sides of the fence.
4 posted on 09/19/2003 9:36:38 AM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Well, even though I railed against the war, I probably would have voted for it. Then again, maybe I wouldn't have. It really depends what group I'm campaigning in front of. You see, once you take a position on an issue people expect you to maintain that position. So, as President, I promise not to take any position on any issues. I am both for and against your important issues, and you can be assured that I will neither implement them nor stand in their way. Any other questions? Say, who else is running for President anyway besides that Schwarzenegger guy? I can beat him.
5 posted on 09/19/2003 9:55:06 AM PDT by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Grima Wormtongue runs for office.

"He just wants them to relook the policy..."

What a backstabber, what a weasel....
6 posted on 09/19/2003 9:58:26 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (There are two certainties. Death and Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
I too am conflicted,see both sides,have trouble expressing my final position. But then, I'm not running for office and never made general.
7 posted on 09/19/2003 10:13:30 AM PDT by larryjohnson (USAF(Ret))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
Clark is a total contradiction. He can't come to a conclusion about anything. Even when he announced that he was a democrat it came out as such a tortured decision.

Nice waffling on the "don't ask, don't tell" business too. Maybe they need to re-look, not necessarily change, but re-look. Ah yep...sounds like a reasoned response to me.

I think Clark is going to go down in flames once he exposes himself to the public and the campaign heats up.

8 posted on 09/19/2003 10:16:51 AM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sender
LOL!!! Clark is conflicted period. I'm becoming convinced that Hillary pushed him into this and I'm not so sure he really wants to do it.

Did you see the clip on Special Report wherein they showed ole Wes coming out of the CNN studios last February. The press was peppering him with questions and he says "mind if I make a phone call?" They say "no problem" so Clark calls his handler on his cell phone - in complete view and hearing range of the camera - and asks the guy on the phone if he should answers questions. The guy says no and Clark repeats it (something like "not a good idea, okay.."), hangs up and tells the press "no questions today" and walks away. It was amazing.

9 posted on 09/19/2003 10:19:56 AM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
I too am conflicted,see both sides,have trouble expressing my final position. But then, I'm not running for office and never made general.
10 posted on 09/19/2003 10:27:38 AM PDT by larryjohnson (USAF(Ret))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
"The armed forces are a want machine," he said. "They are structured to develop want."

sarcasm> Clark also said, "There is not a single program that is as much a WANT PROGRAM as the military.

Social security, Welfare, Healthcare, environmental programs do not qualify as want programs. /sarcasm>

11 posted on 09/19/2003 10:27:44 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Clone Ann Coulter, the woman sent by God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Jeez - what a dope. Where to start analyzing this mess'a words?:

"I'd like to see the military relook the policy," he said. "I didn't say change it — I said relook it."

RELOOK?? I thought he was a Rhodes Scholar?!

"I don't know if I would have or not. I've said it both ways because when you get into this, what happens is you have to put yourself in a position — on balance, I probably would have voted for it."

Deja va all over again. Remember Xlinton's response when asked how he would have voted for the Gulf War Resolution - "Well, I would have voted for it but I understand and support those who voted against it so I would have voted against it. Or something to that effect.

"Mary, help!" - Kinda says it all, doesnt it?

12 posted on 09/19/2003 10:42:00 AM PDT by capydick ("We're the party that wants to see an America in which people can still get rich.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Ha, ha ha ha! Amazing. Supposedly when he got grilled about support for the war, he called out "Mary...help!" to his campaign manager. He didn't even watch the previous dem debates! This should be really good to watch him onstage, IF he really shows up for the next debate. I have a strange feeling he will have a previous engagement that night.
13 posted on 09/19/2003 10:48:48 AM PDT by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
moment later, he said: "I don't know if I would have or not. I've said it both ways because when you get into this, what happens is you have to put yourself in a position — on balance, I probably would have voted for it."

Okay, Gen'l, I'll just mark you down as "Indecisive"

Moving to fill in the blanks of his candidacy a day after he announced for president, General Clark also said that he had been a Republican who had turned Democratic after listening to the early campaign appeals of a fellow Arkansan, Bill Clinton.

... and mark you down for "gullible" and "easily deceived" too


14 posted on 09/19/2003 11:27:10 AM PDT by WOSG (Dont put Cali on CRUZ CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Wow! I can swear I have heard him say himself that this war was wrong and should not have been carried out. I guess when Clintons are supportive of you, then lying is to be expected!
15 posted on 09/19/2003 11:47:30 AM PDT by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Hah! Didn't I say that Clark would have a previous engagement for the next dem debate?

On Thursday night, Clark's campaign said he would participate in the debate, but then quickly backtracked. Spokeswoman Holly Johnson said Clark had a contract to give a paid speech in Texas next Thursday at the same time the nine other Democratic candidates planned to gather.

"I hope I'll be there," Clark said after a campaign stop Thursday night in Hollywood, Fla. "I'd like to do it."

16 posted on 09/19/2003 3:12:00 PM PDT by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sender
LOL! Clark is becoming pretty easy to figure out, eh? I hope he does end up making it to the debate though. I'd love to see him fall flat on his face - the dem's great white hope going down in flames.
17 posted on 09/19/2003 9:10:06 PM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Well, the worst traitor in American history, Benedict Arnold, had been a outstanding member of the Continental Army before he betrayed America....out of greed and petty resentments. Would Clark be another?
18 posted on 09/19/2003 10:52:45 PM PDT by WaterDragon (America the beautiful, I love this nation of (legal) immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson