Uh, no. Arnold is. Who was in this race first? Which candidate has the courage to stand by and do nothing as babies are being torn limb from limb in their mothers' wombs? I welcome Arnold to join the baby-killers in the Democrat party.
Daryl Issa. So why did Tom come in and spit in Issa's soup?
It has become clear that Tom is intent on taking down the party with him this election.
Uh, no. Arnold is. Who was in this race first? Which candidate has the courage to stand by and do nothing as babies are being torn limb from limb in their mothers'
wombs? I welcome Arnold to join the baby-killers in the Democrat party.
105 posted on 09/19/2003 11:21 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
That comment was made with the realization that Tom cannot win and Cruz Bustamante cannot be allowed to.
You and I value Tom's platform equally. That still doesn't change the fact that Tom pulls between 8-18% and Arnold pulls 22%-45%. I am not defending Arnold on all counts, but you must realize he is better than Bustamante. He simply is. Is he flawed? Yes! He is flawed. Where Arnold bothers me on five to ten issues, Bustamante bothers me on every issue.
The republicans are pulling around 54% of the vote. Split it and see if you come up with something higher than 30%
Neither you and I want want to see one more abortion. Arnold does not agree with partial birth abortion, but he can't stop it. Cruz for sure won't stop it.
Sorry. This is one we'll probably have to agree to disagree on.