Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Montreal man linked to Clark controversy - Presidential candidate claims pressure
The Star ^ | 9/18/03

Posted on 09/18/2003 12:25:15 PM PDT by areafiftyone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-263 next last
Verrrrrrrrry Intersting
1 posted on 09/18/2003 12:25:15 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: areafiftyone
He is a lyin' prima donna.
3 posted on 09/18/2003 12:31:16 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone; Miss Marple
The plot thickens..

Howie's friends in the media begin to to pick Wes apart...hehehehe!

4 posted on 09/18/2003 12:31:59 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Everyone knows it was a self-important lie.
5 posted on 09/18/2003 12:32:11 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
"I did not have actual conversations with that man, Mr. Hecht."
6 posted on 09/18/2003 12:32:33 PM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoOrdnance
Why you blaming Peach??
7 posted on 09/18/2003 12:32:45 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GoOrdnance
But this can't be!!! Peach has assured all of us that Clark has claimed specifically that he received a call from the White House on 9/11.

Which is exactly what this article confirms.

8 posted on 09/18/2003 12:33:24 PM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GoOrdnance; Peach
But it is!!! And Peach is correct in her assurance.
9 posted on 09/18/2003 12:34:24 PM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Snicker Snicker!
10 posted on 09/18/2003 12:34:49 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
MUST read
11 posted on 09/18/2003 12:35:01 PM PDT by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
I hope this puts a steak in the heart of his campaign but since it is supposedly a clinton spectacle, I doubt it.
12 posted on 09/18/2003 12:37:41 PM PDT by GrandmaPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoOrdnance
Clark lied - why can't you just face the fact and stop blaming everyone else? Sheesh, you sound like a Clinton knee-padder.
13 posted on 09/18/2003 12:40:37 PM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Thanks for the link Dio.... Clark is buddies with a guy who pushed tainted blood..........hmmm!
14 posted on 09/18/2003 12:41:19 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: GoOrdnance
Clark first implied the call, not long after the attacks, might have come from White House, then later said it came from a Middle Eastern think tank in Canada. He has never identified the caller.

This article seems to confirm what I've been saying all along. In addition, I've provided you with the transcript from MSNBC's web site regarding Clark's exact words to Tim Russert.

You can try to spin it any way you wish, but Clark has lied repeatedly about this matter.

16 posted on 09/18/2003 12:42:45 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
So now he didn't get the "shrinking call" on 9 / 11 after all.

Lemme ask you somethin'.

If YOU had this conversation on 9 / 11, wouldn't you remember what day it was?

17 posted on 09/18/2003 12:42:50 PM PDT by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoOrdnance
What about the following statement from the article don't you understand: Clark first implied the call, not long after the attacks, might have come from White House, then later said it came from a Middle Eastern think tank in Canada.
18 posted on 09/18/2003 12:43:08 PM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GrandmaPatriot
Agree with you that this is a Clinton spectacle and would assume shortly that the media will be all at Clark's feet and negative articles will be no more from the mainstream press.

That means it is up to Freepers to dig up and post the dirt on Clark! Someone has to get out the info on Clark and might as well be Freepers and a few of the media friendly to the truth!
19 posted on 09/18/2003 12:43:21 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Alpha Omnicron Pi Mom too! -- Visit http://www.georgewbush.com!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
"Clark first implied the call, not long after the attacks, might have come from White House, then later said..."

No, Clark first SAID the call came from the White House - there was no "implied" involved.

Typical revisionists already at work.

20 posted on 09/18/2003 12:43:31 PM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-263 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson