Posted on 09/17/2003 6:56:46 AM PDT by truthandlife
U.S. intelligence agencies are weighing numerous reports that Iraq diverted weapons of mass destruction to Syria and Lebanon to hide them from United Nations weapons inspectors and American forces in Iraq.
In testimony Sept. 16, John Bolton, undersecretary of state for arms control, referred to reports that Iraqi WMD had been transferred to Syria. "We have seen these reports, reviewed them carefully, and see them as cause for concern," he said.
"Thus far we have been unable to confirm that such transfers occurred," he said in congressional testimony. "We are continuing with the full breadth of resources at our command to seek conclusive evidence that any such transfer has taken place."
Bolton's testimony before a House International Relations subcommittee was reported in the Sept. 17 edition of The Washington Times.
Bolton also discussed North Korean assistance to Syria's development of medium-range missiles.
"Damascus is pursuing both solid- and liquid-propellant missile programs and relies extensively on foreign assistance in these endeavors," he said.
Mr. Bolton told the subcommittee that his testimony had been approved by the U.S. intelligence and policy communities, The Times report said.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld acknowledged there had been "snippets of information over time" about weapons transfers from Iraq to Syria.
"We know they buried MiG airplanes," Mr. Rumsfeld told reporters. "We know they buried a lot of things. And we know in the prior war they flew their planes into Iran, for example. I do not have hard evidence that I could say that they have done that."
Unlike the WMD fiasco in Iraq, it would be nice to have some real evidence. If these weapons are in Syria or Lebanon, how about some satilite photos of missiles? Or on the ground? We've been burned by the type of intellegence this is based on. Hopefully, unless it gets backed up soon, it will not lead to a new conflict, we have enough to do in Iraq.
Unlike the WMD fiasco in Iraq, it would be nice to have some real evidence. If these weapons are in Syria or Lebanon, how about some satilite photos of missiles? Or on the ground? We've been burned by the type of intellegence this is based on. Hopefully, unless it gets backed up soon, it will not lead to a new conflict, we have enough to do in Iraq.
What fiasco? There's plenty of evidence for even the most casual observer. But some absolutely refuse to be convinced. Kinda like those folks that still think the Impeached Rapist is a man of integrity. LOL
Coop, with due respect, and knowing that you are aware of the disillusionment I have expressed elsewhere, can you kindly give the high level bullet points on the plenty of evidence? I am at minimum a casual observer, a supporter of the war, a supporter of the President, and I don't know of any evidence of WMD. There was a gas attack a dozen years ago. Besides that. Any recent finds? Instead of attacking, how about helping out by providing some information? You don't have to, but I am asking you nicely if you could. Thanks.
We know they buried MiG airplanes," Mr. Rumsfeld told reporters. "We know they buried a lot of things. And we know in the prior war they flew their planes into Iran, for example. I do not have hard evidence that I could say that they have done that."
Well, which is it? I support the administration on Iraq, even though I think intelligence was shoddy and they could have done a much better job. Still better to be safe than sorry? There is no doubt that Syria is an anti-US terrorist state, but I think the administration needs more 'proof' this time around.
Tell you what. You show evidence that I attacked you, and I'll be happy to provide some evidence of WMDs. Since you asked so nicely. :-)
I'm gonna wait right here at my desk..I know, with all the data, it can take a little time to get it all posted. That's OK. we'l just quietly wait for a while. relax.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/robertnovak/rn20030809.shtml
Excerpt:Kay has told his superiors he has found substantial evidence of biological weapons in Iraq, plus considerable missile development.
CIA Holds Position on Mobile Labs
Excerpt:The CIA stands by its assessment that complex mobile laboratories discovered in Iraq were designed and built to produce biological weapons, a senior CIA official told CNN on Saturday.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/06/07/cia.mobile.labs/index.html
And, although they're not technically WMDs, let's not forget right before the war started the illegal missiles discovered. :-)
I wish I could remember the source, but it was a U.S. official when asked about WMD. He said if WMD were hot coffee, then no, we have not found the ground roast coffee. However, we have located the cup, spoon, sugar, creamer, filter, coffee pot, danish, and instructions for making the coffee.
Look at it this way. In order to believe WMDs do not exist, you have to believe Saddam Hussein was telling the truth. LOL!
Well stated and to the point. If a policeman is hunting a fugitive reported by agencies to be armed and dangerous, he will treat said perp as armed and dangerous. I suspect the weapons were transferred. I don't believe the Baathists would throw away WMDs lightly and swagger about them for years.
BTW, it's helpful to recall something that came up when our guys took the Baghdad Airport. Remember that huge tunnel complex they found there, and the reports of all manner of other tunnel complexes around Iraq? If there are WMDs, I think we can be reasonably sure they'd be hidden in one of those tunnels.
And, for that matter, so might Saddam be hidden in a tunnel complex.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/982684/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.