Skip to comments.
SCO swings back at Red Hat
c/net ^
| 09/15/03
| David Becker
Posted on 09/16/2003 7:16:47 AM PDT by Salo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
More grist for the mill.
1
posted on
09/16/2003 7:16:50 AM PDT
by
Salo
To: rdb3
Paging Dr. Penguin.
2
posted on
09/16/2003 7:18:00 AM PDT
by
Salo
(Lying to a jury is perjury. Lying to the people is politics.)
To: Nick Danger; Golden Eagle
Paging other interested parties.
3
posted on
09/16/2003 7:19:48 AM PDT
by
Salo
To: Salo
SCO further riled the Linux community by sending letters to 1,500 information technology managers, warning them that any use of Linux could expose them to intellectual property suits. There you have it -- unless SCO can back up its claims with evidence of infringement, anybody who sells Linux has standing to sue them.
To site the closest analogy I can think of to SCO's actions, I seem to recall Proctor & Gamble sucessfully suing some Amway people for spreading the "devil worship" rumor....
4
posted on
09/16/2003 7:35:25 AM PDT
by
steve-b
To: Salo
It's about time for the dump part of SCO's pump-and-dump scam.
5
posted on
09/16/2003 7:42:24 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
To: John Robinson; B Knotts; stainlessbanner; TechJunkYard; ShadowAce; Knitebane; AppyPappy; jae471; ...
The Penguin Ping.
Wanna be Penguified? Just holla!

Got root?
6
posted on
09/16/2003 7:44:40 AM PDT
by
rdb3
(Which is more powerful: The story or the warrior?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They've been slow/steady dumping since this lawsuit came out. I have yet to see any of the officers buying stock at market rates.
7
posted on
09/16/2003 7:45:10 AM PDT
by
Salo
To: Salo
As usual, the lawyers will make more money than the programmers and software designers.
To: steve-b
We tore ours up (the letter). SCO can kiss my Linux @$$
To: Rick.Donaldson
If you get an invoice from them, don't tear it!!
You could win Big Money(tm) in a Class Action Lawsuit!
To: Blue Screen of Death
As usual, the lawyers will make more money than the programmers and software designers.
That's why I'm going back to finish my bachelors and then going on to law school... :) Even specialized IT skills are becoming commoditized.
11
posted on
09/16/2003 8:27:56 AM PDT
by
adam_az
To: Salo
SCO argued that Red Hat has no grounds to sue SCO, as SCO's actions against the open-source Linux operating system have not specifically targeted Red Hat. They have a point. A class action suit on behalf of all vendors who distribute Linux and all open source developers would be much more appropriate.
"Be careful what you wish for..."
12
posted on
09/16/2003 8:33:00 AM PDT
by
Redcloak
(...from the occupied Republic of California.)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Bush2000; Golden Eagle; TheEngineer
You three seem to have a predisposition to call Linux users "blowhards" and butcher my comments in re posting them. So take a look at THIS COMPLETE little trip down "memory lane" curtasy of TechJunkYard as I remember.
 |
Oh, speaking of blowhards... here's one who wants to steal the IP rights of thousands of Linux hackers... |
 |
And here are his friends, Bozo and Bubbles. |
14
posted on
09/16/2003 12:53:44 PM PDT
by
Coral Snake
(Biting commies, crooks, globalist traitors, islamofascists and any other type of Anti American)
To: Redcloak
SCO's actions against the open-source Linux operating system have not specifically targeted Red Hat.
They have a point.
Well, no, they don't. The thing to understand about SCO is that their press releases tend not to reflect actual facts. Darl McBride is on tape, during his conference call with investment analysts, specifically mentioning Red Hat as a possible "infringer."
In addition to that, Red Hat's complaint states that
SCO has specifically targeted Red Hat with its campaign by repeatedly meeting with financial analysts who cover Red Hat's stock and by, among other things, inviting certain of Red Hat's institutional investors to a briefing held on or about July 22, 2003. During the July 22 briefing, SCO presented information that it knew or should have known to be false and/or misleading about any possible infringement of SCO's UNIX code by Red Hat's LINUX distribution.
SCO cannot invite another company's institutional investors to a "briefing" where they make unsubstantiated claims, and then say that "SCO's actions have not specifically targeted Red Hat." But as you can see, they say it anyway. Because they are liars.
15
posted on
09/16/2003 1:37:15 PM PDT
by
Nick Danger
(Time is what keeps everything from happening at once)
To: Nick Danger
I wonder why these "authoritative" sources from the trolls don't report on SCO exectutives "cashing out" their stock like bilge rats attempting to leave the Titanic.
16
posted on
09/16/2003 2:07:27 PM PDT
by
Coral Snake
(Biting commies, crooks, globalist traitors, islamofascists and any other type of Anti American)
To: Coral Snake
To: Salo
SCO's claims are not true and are solely designed to create an atmosphere of fear, uncertainty and doubt about Linux...They mentioned FUD right there in the pleading? That's hilarious.
18
posted on
09/16/2003 2:49:51 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(Calm down. Eat some fruit or something.)
To: Petronski
I'm just waiting for someone to file a motion that includes a comment about McBride "smoking crack".
19
posted on
09/16/2003 3:01:24 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
(Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
To: TheEngineer
I have windows 98 and have had nothing but trouble. Blue screen crashes and the damn thing refuses to shut down.
Everytime I get the problems fixed, they come back.
I'm considering upgrading to windows 2000, but this Linux debate has me interested.
Can Linux do everything that windows does?
Where can I get some good info on Linux?
Thanks...
20
posted on
09/16/2003 3:17:17 PM PDT
by
radioman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson