Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'There Is Corruption in Our Business' [Journalists bribed Saddam's thugs]
Editor and Publisher. com ^ | SEPTEMBER 15, 2003 | John Burns

Posted on 09/15/2003 4:10:50 PM PDT by aculeus

The following are the words of New York Times correspondent John F. Burns, on his experiences reporting from Baghdad during the war. Excerpted from the book Embedded: The Media at War in Iraq, an Oral History by Bill Katovsky and Timothy Carlson, published this week by The Lyons Press, used with permission.

From the point of view of my being in Baghdad, I had more authority than anybody else. Without contest, I was the most closely watched and unfavored of all the correspondents there because of what I wrote about terror whilst Saddam Hussein was still in power.

Terror, totalitarian states, and their ways are nothing new to me, but I felt from the start that this was in a category by itself, with the possible exception in the present world of North Korea. I felt that that was the central truth that has to be told about this place. It was also the essential truth that was untold by the vast majority of correspondents here. Why? Because they judged that the only way they could keep themselves in play here was to pretend that it was okay.

There were correspondents who thought it appropriate to seek the approbation of the people who governed their lives. This was the ministry of information, and particularly the director of the ministry. By taking him out for long candlelit dinners, plying him with sweet cakes, plying him with mobile phones at $600 each for members of his family, and giving bribes of thousands of dollars. Senior members of the information ministry took hundreds of thousands of dollars of bribes from these television correspondents who then behaved as if they were in Belgium. They never mentioned the function of minders. Never mentioned terror.

In one case, a correspondent actually went to the Internet Center at the Al-Rashid Hotel and printed out copies of his and other people's stories -- mine included -- specifically in order to be able to show the difference between himself and the others. He wanted to show what a good boy he was compared to this enemy of the state. He was with a major American newspaper.

Yeah, it was an absolutely disgraceful performance. CNN's Eason Jordan's op-ed piece in The New York Times missed that point completely. The point is not whether we protect the people who work for us by not disclosing the terrible things they tell us. Of course we do. But the people who work for us are only one thousandth of one percent of the people of Iraq. So why not tell the story of the other people of Iraq? It doesn't preclude you from telling about terror. Of murder on a mass scale just because you won't talk about how your driver's brother was murdered.

...

In February I was denied a visa. Then I found there were visas available. I was in Amman. Some of my rivals who had omitted to notice that Iraq was a terror state were busy here sucking up. They were very pleased with themselves. These were people who'd argued that it was essential to be in Iraq for the war. I got a visa of dubious quality; it was a visa which allowed me to come in and cover the peace movement.

I assumed I would be thrown out immediately. I arrived only two weeks before the war. They accredited me. They took my passport away and held it for five days until a man who is said to be a deputy director of the Mukhabarat showed up one day -- a certain Mr. Sa'ad Mutana.

(Excerpt) Read more at editorandpublisher.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cnn; easonjordan; embeddedreport; oif; warcorrespondents
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 09/15/2003 4:10:52 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus
bump
2 posted on 09/15/2003 4:17:05 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Who Would the Terrorist Vote For ??????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton; general_re
Senior members of the information ministry took hundreds of thousands of dollars of bribes from these television correspondents who then behaved as if they were in Belgium. They never mentioned the function of minders. Never mentioned terror.

BBC? CNN?

3 posted on 09/15/2003 4:19:18 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
OMG BUMP
4 posted on 09/15/2003 4:20:45 PM PDT by joyce11111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton; general_re
In one case, a correspondent actually went to the Internet Center at the Al-Rashid Hotel and printed out copies of his and other people's stories -- mine included -- specifically in order to be able to show the difference between himself and the others. He wanted to show what a good boy he was compared to this enemy of the state. He was with a major American newspaper.

Washington Post? LA Times? (This is one case where, thanks to the gutsy and honest Burns, the New York Times is above suspicion.)

It must be a major papers since others didn't have people in Iraq prior to the war.

5 posted on 09/15/2003 4:22:52 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
FYI
6 posted on 09/15/2003 4:38:48 PM PDT by MizSterious (Support whirled peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Fantastic article. I only wish he'd named all the names. Interesting that he suggests that one reason he has some values and a conscience is that he's 58 years old. I think there is an oblique suggestion there that he has no further career prospects with the New York Times.

Did it really have to be excerpted?

7 posted on 09/15/2003 5:11:49 PM PDT by TheMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; Pharmboy; reformed_democrat; RatherBiased.com; nopardons; Tamsey; Miss Marple; SwatTeam; ...

This is the Mainstream Media Shenanigans ping list. Please freepmail me to be added or dropped.
Please note this is a medium- to high-volume list.
Please feel free to ping me if you come across a thread you would think worthy of this ping list. I can't catch them all!


8 posted on 09/15/2003 5:53:24 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheMole
Did it really have to be excerpted?

No.

9 posted on 09/15/2003 5:54:02 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Holy moly. Wining and dining Saddam. There's a good career booster for you - if you work for the media, that is.
10 posted on 09/15/2003 6:02:21 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
self bump for later
11 posted on 09/15/2003 6:13:59 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
How then is alot of this then the manufacturing of news ? I
become convinced from time to time that the Isreali news nightmare which keeps playing as a rerun makes great fodder for the Arab press as well as some press in the states.
12 posted on 09/15/2003 6:21:10 PM PDT by Helms (The French Body Count is now 15,000 elderly and exceeds US Iraq casualties)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Wonder what the intimidated Christine Amanpour would have to say about this. She is whining about some Bush led government-backed silencing of journalists? Maybe she ought to look into the craven amongst her own.
13 posted on 09/15/2003 6:42:04 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
All those years in Iraq and no stories about rape rooms and people being put in shredders?

Reporters (and I use the term loosely) feared loss of "access"?

In Nazi Germany would our modern day press have reported on the SS's new uniforms while skipping the story of innocent people being burned alive in ovens? Would they look at us with a straight face and tell us we were getting the "news".

No, we would have had better coverage if our press had interviewed escapees. May reporters choke on the memories of fancy dinners eaten with these lying monsters.

14 posted on 09/15/2003 6:50:39 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheMole
Did it really have to be excerpted?

Their site has all sorts of warnings about copying their articles. It is after all aimed at publishers (who own copyrights) and editors. Professionals.

Is it really such a big deal for you to go to their site? Why risk another blowup ala the WashPost LATimes of not long ago?

15 posted on 09/15/2003 6:59:55 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Applause for Mr. Burns, though I wish he'd named these present-day Durantys.
16 posted on 09/15/2003 7:03:44 PM PDT by dighton (NLC™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Applause for Mr. Burns, though I wish he'd named these present-day Durantys.

Perhaps with this tidbit followed by his book, interviews, etc., someone else will be prompted to get the facts.

One of Fox's Iraqi-based people might even get some help from Iraqi ex-minder types.

I'm sure Ailes would love to nail CNN especially following the Amanpour crapola spewed today.

17 posted on 09/15/2003 7:10:42 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
Good Point.
18 posted on 09/15/2003 7:12:32 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
There is corruption in our business. We need to get back to basics. This war should be studied and talked about. In the run up to this war, to my mind, there was a gross abdication of responsibility. You have to be ready to listen to whispers.
The First Amendment assigns the responsibility for communication strictly to the reader/listener. It's caveat lector--let the reader beware, for the government is forbidden to sort things out and censor the unreliable.

19 posted on 09/15/2003 8:41:00 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The everyday blessings of God are great--they just don't make "good copy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
There are those here who must say "why did you excerpt" on each post they go to. Guess it makes them feel good or something, as I have yet to understand why.
20 posted on 09/15/2003 8:50:57 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson