Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC- Recall election to be delayed
Pete Williams MSNBC ^ | Pete Williams

Posted on 09/15/2003 10:18:32 AM PDT by Ragirl

California Appeals Court - Recall should be blocked!!!

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2003election; 9thcircuit; 9thcircuitcourt; circus; circustent; davisrecalleelection; democrap; dirtytricks; election2003; floriduhagain; graydavis; impeachthe9th; outofcontrol; recall; thefixisin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 801-811 next last
To: Sir Gawain
I haven't been to DU, but I subscribe to one of the loonier email newsletters (CLH: they thought that the Wellstone crash was a Republican plot). They are especially vile, and this was their take: "Court blocks GOP's Calif. Coup --A federal appeals court today blocked the GOP October 7 California coup ['recall election'], but stayed its order for seven days to allow an appeal. The ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals follows a hearing last week in which the American Civil Liberties Union sought a postponment of the vote. The ACLU argued that election officials should have more time to replace antiquated voting machines in several California counties."

I have no comment.

641 posted on 09/15/2003 1:28:53 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

Comment #642 Removed by Moderator

To: Sir Gawain
The will of the people is only REALLY important when it serves the purpose of the Dim party. -- Otherwise, to hell with 'em.

Prairie
643 posted on 09/15/2003 1:32:04 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Brought to you by The American Democratic Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
florida would have been a nightmare if the SCOTUS had not acted

The nightmare would have moved to Washington by 12/16/01.

The Florida Supreme Court cannot and could not enjoin the Legislature from appointing a slate of electors.

It is long past time to have a fight over judicial bodies making political decisions. The Constitution provides a clear, explicit pathway to fill the office of President under circumstances such as this.

It was foolish not to use it.

644 posted on 09/15/2003 1:32:56 PM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 640 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
If the election winds up being cancelled (which I doubt when the dust settles), all ballots already cast will be voided out.

OK. I hope they'll have enough time to re-send them out again.
This is chaos. Democrats seem to thrive on it.

645 posted on 09/15/2003 1:35:14 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
the "stolen election" mantra would have been even worse had we taken this route. as it stands, at the time of the SCOTUS ruling for Bush, most americans thought that was the correct decision.
646 posted on 09/15/2003 1:35:21 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies]

To: HIDEK6; grayout
Based on this logic, couldn't the next election be voided (hypthetically) because not all states and counties across the country will be upto snuff re: new voting machines in the next presidential election.
647 posted on 09/15/2003 1:36:47 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: shellylet
"I'm curious to know how all those minorities feel about being called stuuuuuuuuuuuuuupid!

They should be used to it by now....heck they are the slaves of the liberal Plantation, and seem to want to remain captive!!!

648 posted on 09/15/2003 1:36:48 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Whiners & PC'ers.......members of the new OFFENDED Political Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci; pogo101; Congressman Billybob
Sanda Day O'Connor is out of the country.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/983023/posts

Woops! Now what say you all?? :)

Prairie
649 posted on 09/15/2003 1:44:01 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Brought to you by The American Democratic Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
more US citizens have been killed in Compton in the last 4 months than in Afganistan and Iraq combined...still behind Detroit and DC tho'
650 posted on 09/15/2003 1:45:42 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze; Congressman Billybob
Sanda Day O'Connor is out of the country.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/983023/posts

Woops! Now what say you all?? :)
From that thread:
To: ambrose

Justices of the Supreme Court are ALWAYS reachable, and ALWAYS on duty if the Court Rules so require.

I recall the legendary story about the late Justice Douglas. Some lawyers wanted his one-Justice recision on an environmental case. They hiked two days into the woods to find the Justice. He read their papers, and signed their Order. Then they hiked two days out to get that Order to the Clerk of the Supreme Court.

Given faxes and cell phones, I believe that Justice O'Connor is already reviewing this case through her Clerks, knowing that it will wind up in her lap. If she signs an Order on the Champs Elisee in Paris, it will be just as effective as if she signed it in her Chambers on 2nd Street in Washington, D.C.

John / Billybob

7 posted on 09/15/2003 1:31 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Everyone talks about Congress; I am doing something about it.)


651 posted on 09/15/2003 1:50:24 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
"I wonder how the DUmmies are spinning this coup. After all, they're supposed to be about "the will of the people".

From a DUh poster:

Clever, clever CA Court!

If they are NOT using it as a precedent[Bush vs Gore Florida 2000], then the SCOTUS cannot overrule or refuse the case based on their earlier ruling saying that Florida 2000 could NOT be used as a precedent!

They would either have to:
A) take the case and independently make the same ludicrous ruling again
B) take the case and use their own ludicrous ruling as a precedent (despite them saying that no one should ever do so)
C) take the case and uphold it (in which case they would be conflicting with their ruling in Florida 2000) or
D) or not take the case at all.
As I stated above, even if they did not take the case, the debate will come to the fore, which will result in new questions about the legitimacy of the decision in Florida 2000, and therefore, the legitimacy of the Bush presidency itself.

Clever, clever CA Court! They could end up making the CA recall backfire in a big way

------------------------------------------------------------

Is this guy blowing smoke or what?

He thinks the 9th is being brazenly cunning.

652 posted on 09/15/2003 1:51:13 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
"and you did not turn him in for vote fraud? "

I made two phone calls for procedures to report "vote fraud"...The first person just laughed and said she couldn't help me....My second call resulted in the rep telling me to "get a life" and hung up on...of course this was after he asked whether my co-worker had voted for Gore or Bush and I had replied "he voted for Gore all three times."

653 posted on 09/15/2003 1:54:55 PM PDT by A_Niceguy_in_CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Doesn't the use of (even more of) these machines in the last election make that election invalid?

If the court is right, then there should logically be a new special election.

654 posted on 09/15/2003 1:55:10 PM PDT by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze; Congressman Billybob
First off, Billybob is correct that her "away" status renders her unreachable.

But to address your point on a technical, what-if-somehow-she-can't-be-reached basis, SCOTUS Rule 22.3 provides that "[w]hen the Circuit
Justice is unavailable for any reason, the application addressed to that Justice will be distributed to the Justice then available who is next junior to the Circuit Justice; the turn of the Chief Justice follows that of the most junior Justice."

The "Justice next junior to" O'Connor is ANTONIN SCALIA.
655 posted on 09/15/2003 1:56:17 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze; Congressman Billybob
Whoops. In my last post, I meant to lead off with "does NOT render her unreachable."
656 posted on 09/15/2003 1:57:10 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies]

To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
are you sh**ting me?!?
657 posted on 09/15/2003 1:58:24 PM PDT by King Prout (people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
If that is the case then either (a) discontinue all elections where punch equipment is used or (b) disallow all minorities the right to vote.

That should do the trick.
658 posted on 09/15/2003 2:00:19 PM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
WHew, I'll say the odds are high. The 9th Circus verily reeks of Clinton-appointed liberals.

Yup, the three 9th Circus that ruled on the Election Recall case were all appointed by CLINTON.

659 posted on 09/15/2003 2:00:20 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
Cool. Once Antonin Scalia reads this decision from the Nine Circus, he'll go bananas!
660 posted on 09/15/2003 2:01:09 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 801-811 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson