Skip to comments.
McClintock, Schwarzenegger Spar On Radio Show
KCRA Channel ^
| September 12, 2003
Posted on 09/12/2003 2:17:52 PM PDT by calcowgirl
Candidates Speak On "Armstrong & Getty Show"
POSTED: 12:13 p.m. PDT September 12, 2003 UPDATED: 1:27 p.m. PDT September 12, 2003
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Arnold Schwarzenegger and Tom McClintock had a date of sorts Friday morning.
The hosts of Sacramento talk radio program "The Armstrong and Getty Show" on Talk 650 KSTE arranged a surprise on-air confrontation between the two. McClintock asked Schwarzenegger repeatedly to debate him, and the actor demurred.
McClintock asked: "We've got a Republican convention coming up this weekend, you and I are the two Republican candidates now left in the race, why don't we get together and discuss the major issues of this campaign?"
Schwarzenegger replied that he'd be, in his words, "more than happy" to "get together" with the state senator from Northridge.
McClintock repeated his question: "Can we do that in a debate before the convention Saturday? We're both going to be there."
Schwarzenegger said "No," adding that he would be more than happy to meet with McClintock and discuss issues.
The actor then told McClintock the important thing is to work together on issues. McClintock extended the debate offer a final time and Schwarzenegger signed off by saying, "We will talk about all those things, and we will have a great time at the Republican convention."
A Los Angeles Times poll released late Thursday showed McClintock with support from 18 percent of likely voters to Schwarzenegger's 25 percent. McClintock's support grew 6 percentage points since the August poll, while Schwarzenegger's grew 3 percentage points. Democratic Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante was the leading candidate in the poll, with 30 percent.
"The Armstrong & Getty Show" also airs on KQCA-58 TV.
Copyright 2003 by TheKCRAChannel and The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: mcclintock; recall; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-212 next last
To: Tempest
Hey, it's Mr. Spacely. (Jetsons)
To: NormsRevenge
Like I'd expect sense or truth from an unapologetic liar like you. What nerve you have.
62
posted on
09/12/2003 5:05:29 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: NormsRevenge
Liar.
63
posted on
09/12/2003 5:05:56 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
I heard that current polling data now shows that McClintock would beat Bustanut 42% to 40% head to head if Aahnuld drops out. However, Aahnuld would beat Bustanazi by 45% to 40% if McClintock drops out.
One if them has to drop out. The Sooner the better.
64
posted on
09/12/2003 5:07:31 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
I heard that current polling data now shows that McClintock would beat Bustanut 42% to 40% head to head if Aahnuld drops out. However, Aahnuld would beat Bustanazi by 45% to 40% if McClintock drops out.Which poll was this?
65
posted on
09/12/2003 5:10:16 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Hee Haw was supposed to be a television show...not the basis of a political movement...)
To: Nachum
I have never seen that figure. Where did you get it?
I have only seen that McC would lose handily, and Schw win handily.
Love the screenie, BTW.
Dan
66
posted on
09/12/2003 5:10:29 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Poohbah
I heard this on the Bill Handle show this morning on KFI Los Angeles. I am not sure.
67
posted on
09/12/2003 5:11:26 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Poohbah
So, did ambrose ever answer your question, in any form?
68
posted on
09/12/2003 5:12:03 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
Not sure. Heard this on the Bill Handle show on KFI Los Angeles this morning. Not sure where he was quoting from.-
69
posted on
09/12/2003 5:13:11 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: BibChr
Who's lying to who here?
To: Tempest
>>>I think Arnold just doesn't want to embarress McClintock.Hahahahahahaha You're funny, but also very pathetic.
Here's the facts. Your boy Arnold lacks the cojones to face McClintock, one on one, man to man. Arnold is a chicken s**t liberal (RINO) Republican who does well in a controlled environment. Like the softball interview O'Reilly gave him the other night. Arnold can't think on his feet and needs coaching to tell him how to act and what to say in public. Sort of like his movie career. LOL
To: Nachum
I take anything from Bill Handel with VERY large grain of NaCl...
72
posted on
09/12/2003 5:15:07 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Hee Haw was supposed to be a television show...not the basis of a political movement...)
To: Poohbah
LOL
73
posted on
09/12/2003 5:16:35 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: FairOpinion
suppose Arnold withdraws, probably half his support will go to Tom and half to Bustamante.IMO, if Arnie drops out Tom would be very lucky to get around 55% of Arnies vote. The rest could not bring themselves to vote for the "extreme social conservative - Tom McClintock" Most of the rest - 45% - would vote for no recall or not vote. Tom will not get much more than 40%, no matter what.
To: BibChr
So, did ambrose ever answer your question, in any form?No. He did claim to be opposed to any delay in the election.
But he NCND'd on the question of whether he is, in fact, Rick Hasen. Therefore, I have no trust or confidence in anything he says.
75
posted on
09/12/2003 5:17:44 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Hee Haw was supposed to be a television show...not the basis of a political movement...)
To: Reagan Man
Here's the facts. Your boy Arnold lacks the cojones to face McClintock, one on one, man to man.You haven't answered the question: why should he?
He's not running against McClintock.
McClintock is running against Schwarzenegger. He hasn't said a word about Bustamante. Hell, he even takes big wads of cash from Bustamante supporters.
76
posted on
09/12/2003 5:19:46 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Hee Haw was supposed to be a television show...not the basis of a political movement...)
To: NormsRevenge
Bingo!!!
77
posted on
09/12/2003 5:21:09 PM PDT
by
calcowgirl
(Right Wing Crazy #4052977)
To: NormsRevenge
So you saw Clinton get away with lying and not owning up to it, and you thought you'd try? People would just forget?
You're no Clinton.
And conservatives don't lie and shift blame.
As you did.
Dan
78
posted on
09/12/2003 5:22:33 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Poohbah
So who is Rick Hasen?
79
posted on
09/12/2003 5:22:55 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
The guy who apparently filed the amicus brief with the 9th Circuit. ambrose's original post made it sound like he was Rick Hasen.
80
posted on
09/12/2003 5:25:14 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Hee Haw was supposed to be a television show...not the basis of a political movement...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-212 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson