Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McClintock, Schwarzenegger Spar On Radio Show
KCRA Channel ^ | September 12, 2003

Posted on 09/12/2003 2:17:52 PM PDT by calcowgirl

Candidates Speak On "Armstrong & Getty Show"

POSTED: 12:13 p.m. PDT September 12, 2003 UPDATED: 1:27 p.m. PDT September 12, 2003

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Arnold Schwarzenegger and Tom McClintock had a date of sorts Friday morning.

The hosts of Sacramento talk radio program "The Armstrong and Getty Show" on Talk 650 KSTE arranged a surprise on-air confrontation between the two. McClintock asked Schwarzenegger repeatedly to debate him, and the actor demurred.

McClintock asked: "We've got a Republican convention coming up this weekend, you and I are the two Republican candidates now left in the race, why don't we get together and discuss the major issues of this campaign?"

Schwarzenegger replied that he'd be, in his words, "more than happy" to "get together" with the state senator from Northridge.

McClintock repeated his question: "Can we do that in a debate before the convention Saturday? We're both going to be there."

Schwarzenegger said "No," adding that he would be more than happy to meet with McClintock and discuss issues.

The actor then told McClintock the important thing is to work together on issues. McClintock extended the debate offer a final time and Schwarzenegger signed off by saying, "We will talk about all those things, and we will have a great time at the Republican convention."

A Los Angeles Times poll released late Thursday showed McClintock with support from 18 percent of likely voters to Schwarzenegger's 25 percent. McClintock's support grew 6 percentage points since the August poll, while Schwarzenegger's grew 3 percentage points. Democratic Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante was the leading candidate in the poll, with 30 percent.

"The Armstrong & Getty Show" also airs on KQCA-58 TV.

Copyright 2003 by TheKCRAChannel and The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: mcclintock; recall; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-212 next last
To: BibChr
More and more he shows how self-absorbed he is. I suspect he's been a politician too long and it is showing.
21 posted on 09/12/2003 3:26:21 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; BibChr
"The actor then told McClintock the important thing is to work together on issues."

Once again Arnold shows that he has his priorities straight, while McClintock shows that his priorities are only meant to serve him.

Please vote for Tom McClintock. He's the choice of true conservatives everywhere. . . Like me.

22 posted on 09/12/2003 3:33:07 PM PDT by Tempest (I've lost all hope for half of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
A vote for Tom is a vote for Cruz and a vote for abortions. Nice choice!
23 posted on 09/12/2003 3:36:25 PM PDT by Andy from Beaverton (I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Why is McClintock afraid to go on Hugh Hewitt's conservative radio show? He has delined. Is he afraid of a challenge?
24 posted on 09/12/2003 3:37:55 PM PDT by Andy from Beaverton (I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Less than a month away, and he's still trying to ruin his party's chance to win.

Actually, McClintock is the only one standing up for the party, not ruinng it. Arnold certainly does not represent the party's mission.

IMHO, "Winning" with Arnold is not "Winning" for the state, the people, or the party.

25 posted on 09/12/2003 3:46:11 PM PDT by calcowgirl (Right Wing Crazy #4052977)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton
Who's Hugh Hewitt?
26 posted on 09/12/2003 3:47:04 PM PDT by calcowgirl (Right Wing Crazy #4052977)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
McClintock repeated his question: "Can we do that in a debate before the convention Saturday? We're both going to be there."

Schwarzenegger said "No,"

The liberal Arnold is a chicken s**t coward.

27 posted on 09/12/2003 3:53:38 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
>>>IMHO, "Winning" with Arnold is not "Winning" for the state, the people, or the party.

Well said.

28 posted on 09/12/2003 3:55:14 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Beaverton
A vote for Tom is a vote for Cruz and a vote for abortions.

In the beginning, I was willing to give Schwarzenegger the benefit of the doubt but after he started parading liberal democrats and RINO's in front of my face and spitting in my face, I just can't bring myself to support the big guy.

In good conscience, I can only vote for McClintock, a tried and true conservative. McClintock is with us on every single issue.

If Tom McClintock decides to pull out, I'll think about voting for Arnold because you're right - Arnold is better than Cruz on the abortion question. At least Arnold is against partial birth abortion. However, Lager says he won't vote for Schwarzenegger under any circumstances.

29 posted on 09/12/2003 3:58:13 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Like I said, I'm voting for Tom . . . period!


And you should as that is your right to do so if you want to. We all make choices and have to live with them.
30 posted on 09/12/2003 3:58:18 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
More sanctimonious mouth running.

Pretty words from a cross-eyed, lipless guy gets you....a few pretty words.

31 posted on 09/12/2003 4:04:15 PM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Arnold! is making a new career out of evading tough questions. And he's running for governor of California? As if perhaps the going will get *easier* once he succeeds in fooling others into browbeating McC off the stage before the debate begins?

32 posted on 09/12/2003 4:07:10 PM PDT by SteveH (I presume it's too late to DRAFT TED NUGENT?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Like I said, I'm voting for Tom . . . period!

Tom would do nothing to prevent abortion even if he were to be elected. So enabling Bustamante is supposed to better than voting for Arnold?

Si, Republicanos should vote for McClinTaco he is very Mucho Grande to us.

You can't achieve things overnight. Help weaken the Democrats so that we can achieve all our goals. I've come to realize that dealing with the left requires a war of attrition and complacency in chipping away at their power base does not help.

33 posted on 09/12/2003 4:15:11 PM PDT by Tempest (I've lost all hope for half of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Why should Arnold debate McClintock? He's not running against him.
34 posted on 09/12/2003 4:16:22 PM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (There is no shame in being poor, just dressing poorly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Spoken like a true fact-challenged Democrat. The ad hominem argument is your friend.

Let me ask you "Arnold or Bust" types (wow, I didn't realize what a great pun that is until I had typed it) a question. If McClintock does what you wish and pulls out soon, and then Arnold gets handed his lunch in the upcoming debate, either because he gets blindsided by a reference to something in his past which he won't have time to effectively rebut, or because he simply can't articulate a credible response to the Democrat issue-oriented assaults in the allotted time, so much so that it effectively destroys his candidacy, will you still blame McClintock when Arnold loses to Bustamante or will you be able to suppress your egos and muster the integrity to admit you backed the wrong candidate?

35 posted on 09/12/2003 4:17:33 PM PDT by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
The other day I also had a message on my answering machine from "The Republican Assembly" or something like that, telling me that Arnold is afraid to debate McClintock and defend his liberal positions, and of course, vote McClintock.

I think this was a dirty trick on the part of the McClintock campaign, pretending that Republican organizations endorse him, over Arnold, and viciously attacking Arnold, not a word against Bustamante.

I used to at least have respect for Tom, that he is sincere, a decent person, and a conservative, who wants to do what is best. Clearly he is smart enough to know that what he is doing is destructive for California and the Republican party and is doing it anyway.

Perhaps the real Tom is peeking out from under the veneer.
36 posted on 09/12/2003 4:17:50 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I got one of those phone calls, too. It was from the California Republican Assembly. They also called again and asked me for money, because McClintock's too broke to pay for CRA ads (which are usually paid for by the candidates, as the CRA has limited funds).

I asked them why McClintock couldn't use his tribal gaming donations to pay for their ads.

37 posted on 09/12/2003 4:21:23 PM PDT by Poohbah (Hee Haw was supposed to be a television show...not the basis of a political movement...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
I heard this exchange this morning. McClintock was persistent but did not badger Ahnold, and he was not rude. Armstrong & Getty had just let Ahnold speak for about 15 minutes, the exchange occurred, then they interviewed McClintock.

The difference between the two is glaring. Yes, Ahnold may be electable and popular, but he couldn't find his ass with both hands and a hunting dog, politically. He does not know what he is talking about and it shows - he's all platitudes and generalities, and he doesn't answer questions specifically.

McClintock (please, no cross-eyed, lipless comments) is nails on what needs to be done, specifically. From workers comp to taxes he knows the territory. How sad that most people choose charisma and looks over substance.

38 posted on 09/12/2003 4:24:22 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ
The Times deliberately skewed the results, by including more conservatives than the actual voter base.:

"Of the likely voters in The Times Poll sample, 38% identified themselves as conservatives. In the Field Poll, only 32% identified themselves as conservatives. That difference could partially explain McClintock's better showing in the Times survey.

In last November's election for governor, 35% of those who voted identified themselves on exit polls as conservatives. If this year's electorate resembles last year's turnout, The Times Poll would have slightly too many conservatives in it, while the Field sample would have slightly too few.

In the last election, 35% of people identified themselves as liberals. In The Times Poll sample, 34% of those surveyed said they were liberal. But the Field Poll sample included only 25% liberals. (In the Field sample, 43% called themselves moderates, compared with 30% in last year's election)."

LA Times Recall Poll Methodology (Important Information Regarding Today's Recall Poll)

39 posted on 09/12/2003 4:24:39 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The other day I also had a message on my answering machine from "The Republican Assembly" or something like that, telling me that Arnold is afraid to debate McClintock and defend his liberal positions, and of course, vote McClintock. I think this was a dirty trick on the part of the McClintock campaign, pretending that Republican organizations endorse him, over Arnold, and viciously attacking Arnold, not a word against Bustamante.

The California Republican Assembly is not affiliated with the McClintock campaign. It has been around for many years as has the Arizona Republican Assembly. The CRA is a state assembly of conservative Republicans which falls under the National Federation of Republican Assemblies which is now affiliated with Free Republic (see the front page, near the bottom).

Don't go shooting your mouth off until you know what the heck you're talking about.

40 posted on 09/12/2003 4:27:01 PM PDT by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-212 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson