Skip to comments.
Female Former School Bus Driver Convicted in Lubbock of Sexually Assaulting 12-year-old Boy
Lubbock, TX, Avalanche-Journal ^
| 09-12-03
| Drennan, Kerry
Posted on 09/12/2003 5:25:44 AM PDT by Theodore R.
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: Theodore R.
This woman has serious problems and I hope she gets counseling while in jail....fora a long, long time.
2
posted on
09/12/2003 5:27:49 AM PDT
by
WestPacSailor
(Sorry folks, this tagline's closed. The moose out front should of told you.)
To: Theodore R.
being convicted of raping a 12-year-old boy.JEEZ!
Hands off the kid, lady!
3
posted on
09/12/2003 5:29:50 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
To: Theodore R.
"Former female bus driver..."
IF she's formerly female, what is she now?
Perhaps the headline should read "Female former bus driver..."
4
posted on
09/12/2003 5:32:15 AM PDT
by
camle
(not even a water balloon fight can rouse these dullards!)
To: camle
I put "female" in the headline hoping to clarify this tragedy. Obviously, did I not catch the incorrect grammar format. Sorry.
To: Theodore R.
I thought the paper did it. I was enjoying the implications here. didn't mean to embarrass or offend, sorry;-)
ya gotta admit it IS funny!
6
posted on
09/12/2003 5:35:43 AM PDT
by
camle
(not even a water balloon fight can rouse these dullards!)
To: Theodore R.
The boy is now 14, and
Childers, 28,
so he is 14 years younger than she is
claimed she was trying to reassure her lover, who is 19 years older, that she would still want him as he aged.
I guess age does not matter to this woman. 14 years younger or 19 years older - age is just a number.
Childers faces between 5 and 99 years in prison - is my suggestion.
7
posted on
09/12/2003 5:39:01 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(Clone Ann Coulter, the woman sent by God)
To: Theodore R.
I guess I will say what 99.217% of American males think about this.
Damn!
Where were all these bus drivers when I was 12?
8
posted on
09/12/2003 5:39:15 AM PDT
by
djf
To: camle
???
9
posted on
09/12/2003 5:40:12 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: djf
99.217% ?
10
posted on
09/12/2003 5:41:42 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: Theodore R.
Childers are like adulterators but they do it with children instead.
11
posted on
09/12/2003 5:45:12 AM PDT
by
Consort
To: Theodore R.

She probably looks better with a smile and a little make-up.
12
posted on
09/12/2003 5:46:53 AM PDT
by
Maceman
To: Publius6961
Yes
99.217%.It's been well documented in countless government and private studies that have been devoted to this issue over the years. :-)
To: djf
Are you SURE you would desire to have sex with this woman when you were 12?
14
posted on
09/12/2003 5:47:57 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Theodore R.

She probably looks better with a smile and a little make-up.
15
posted on
09/12/2003 5:47:57 AM PDT
by
Maceman
To: Blood of Tyrants
Hey, I'm not the one who wrote the book on Natural Law!
The very little I remember of being 12, oh well, she looks better than a knothole in a pine tree.
16
posted on
09/12/2003 5:53:27 AM PDT
by
djf
To: Theodore R.
Though I find this a bit morbid, and feel this lady should be charged and punished, I also feel the charge was incorrect.
This appears to be consensual sexual contact between an adult and a minor. So where is the assault? Perhaps he was easily manipulated due to his youthful inexperience, but I still see no evidence of force. Perhaps contributing to the delinquency or some such charge would be more appropriate. The sentence should be based upon degree of damage and trauma inflicted upon the minor, though admittedly this may be impossible to determined for years to come.
To: NeonKnight
Pretty much my point. What are we gonna do, rally the legislature to pass a law saying exactly WHEN and WITH WHO a fellows first sexual encounter should be?
Fey on it!
18
posted on
09/12/2003 6:00:52 AM PDT
by
djf
To: djf
You're right. At that age, trees look good to a boy. If a woman who is not totally hideous wants a little afternoon delight....it's on.
I thought the same as you...where were these women when I was 12-18 years old? I never rode a bus and I only recall a couple teachers who were young and attractive enough to not frighten a teenager. Those teachers stirred the bathroom fantasies of many a boy back then but that's all we ever got.
19
posted on
09/12/2003 6:09:38 AM PDT
by
NerdDad
To: NerdDad
Kid'll be fourteen before they wipe the smile off his face.
20
posted on
09/12/2003 6:14:56 AM PDT
by
djf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson