Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New California Recall Poll: Recall leading 62-38%, Arnold 40%, Cruz 28%, Tom 8%
The Knowledge Networks ^ | 9-11-03 | The Knowledge Networks

Posted on 09/11/2003 4:37:49 PM PDT by ambrose


 
Site Map Contact Us
News &
Releases

Home
Who We Are
Custom Services
Syndicated Products
Case Studies & White Papers
News & Releases
About Us
 
 

Press Release

Californians Cast Recall "Votes" in Stanford University/Knowledge Networks Survey

Schwarzenegger has wide lead in closest approximation to date of ballot voters will use on decision day

Menlo Park, CA; September 10, 2003: In conjunction with the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, Knowledge Networks has used its projectable Web-enabled panel to conduct a survey of likely California voters that closely approximates the daunting ballot they will face in the state's October 7th special recall election. As on the actual ballot, the Stanford/Knowledge Networks poll asked voters whether they favor the recall of Governor Gray Davis. The survey then presented the official list of 135 replacement candidates to choose from.

The new poll of 528 likely and registered voters was conducted August 29th to September 8th and shows Californians favoring the recall of the Governor by 62% to 38% (with a margin of error of +/- 4.3 percentage points). Evidencing a strong split along party lines, 91% of Republicans — compared to 42% of Democrats — favor recalling the Governor.

Among the replacement candidates, the survey found that Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger has a commanding lead over his main rival, Democratic Lieutenant Governor Cruz Bustamante, by a margin of 40% to 28%. Only 3% of Republicans indicated that they will vote for Bustamante; but 19% of Democrats said they would vote for Schwarzenegger.

The runners-up are Republican Sen. Tom McClintock (8%), Republican Peter Ueberroth (7%), Independent Arianna Huffington (1%), and unspecified write-in candidates (7%). Bill Simon, who has withdrawn from the race but will still be on the ballot, collected 2%.

For more detailed results and information on the methodology, please view the appendix at www.knowledgenetworks.com/ganp/calisurvey1.pdf.

The Stanford/Knowledge Networks survey is the first to ask voters to choose from the same list of 135 candidates that they will see on election day. Previous polls have restricted voters' choices to the top candidates and have allowed respondents to select "undecided" or similar options.

The Hoover Institution, founded at Stanford University in 1919 by Herbert Hoover, who went on to become the 31st president of the United States, is an interdisciplinary research center for advanced study on domestic public policy and international affairs, with an internationally renowned archives. Lead Hoover/Stanford researchers on the ballot study were

  • Shanto Iyengar, Professor of Communication and Political Science, Chairman of the Department of Communication, Stanford University
  • Morris Fiorina, Senior Fellow of the Hoover Institution and Wendt Family Professor of Political Science, Stanford University
  • David W. Brady, Senior Fellow and Associate Director of Research, Hoover Institution, Stanford University

Knowledge Networks is the leader in high-quality, innovative market research. The company's unique Internet platform allows for quick turnaround of results and for the use of high-quality video and audio in surveys.

In conjunction with its expertise in brands, media, advertising, and analytics, Knowledge Networks uses its consumer panel and other resources to provide insights on consumer behavior and opinions. In addition to government and social policy work, Knowledge Networks specialties include media, brand health, segmentation, and research on pricing, product configuration and advertising.

For more information on KN's extensive practice in government, academic, and non-profit research, go to www.knowledgenetworks.com/ganp.

For more information, contact:
J. Michael Dennis, VP and Managing Director,
Government and Academic Research
(650) 289-2160
mdennis@knowledgenetworks.com or

David W. Brady, Senior Fellow and Associate Director of Research, Hoover Institution, Stanford University
(650) 723-9702
brady@hoover.stanford.edu


   
    © 1999-2003, Knowledge Networks, Inc., All rights reserved. Terms of Use


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: isthatallthereis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last

1 posted on 09/11/2003 4:37:50 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
ping
2 posted on 09/11/2003 4:38:18 PM PDT by ambrose (Free Tommy Chong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Let's hope that Pregerson doesn't see this poll...
3 posted on 09/11/2003 4:38:42 PM PDT by ambrose (Free Tommy Chong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
ever hear of the Knowledge Network?
4 posted on 09/11/2003 4:39:36 PM PDT by ambrose (Free Tommy Chong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I don't think the Nine Circus gives a damn about the Constitution or the law if it thinks it can get away with it...
5 posted on 09/11/2003 4:40:10 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I've thought all along that the ninth would stop the recall, especially if they see Arnold as leading.
6 posted on 09/11/2003 4:46:36 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The survey then presented the official list of 135 replacement candidates to choose from.

Dammit, they didn't publish the detailed results. I'm dying to know if my brother's mother-in-law is polling at 0.001% or better.

7 posted on 09/11/2003 4:54:28 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
How did Arianna get a whole one percent?? She's zooming up!
8 posted on 09/11/2003 5:02:16 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
McClintock's surge has back-surged.
9 posted on 09/11/2003 5:08:03 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I think the anti-SB60 chickens are coming home to roost!
10 posted on 09/11/2003 5:08:12 PM PDT by Coeur de Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
This is right in line with the Survey USA poll of 9/8:

Schwarzenegger...39%
Bustamante..........29%
McClintock..........16%
Margin of error.....3.7%

11 posted on 09/11/2003 5:08:32 PM PDT by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
What happened to Tom's surge? Eight percent, he seems to be headed the wrong direction.
12 posted on 09/11/2003 5:09:36 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
Camejo isn't even on the chart, yet he will get equal airtime at the debate. ;-o
13 posted on 09/11/2003 5:10:14 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Arnold offers "Mouthsful of Metaphors" and "Armsful of Auditors" .. Listen to theO'Reilly interview)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Tom who?
14 posted on 09/11/2003 5:10:37 PM PDT by LPM1888 (Freedom begins when you tell Mrs Grundy to go fly a kite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey; kattracks; Poohbah; strela; jagrmeister; Hillary's Lovely Legs; Chancellor Palpatine
Another day, another poll.
15 posted on 09/11/2003 5:14:35 PM PDT by LisaAnne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
What I love about these poll threads:

If Tom's numbers are up, the RINOs viciously attack him as some kind of traitor who will hand Bustamante the election. When Tom's numbers are down, they belittle him as being completely irrelevant.

I wish these RINO jackals would give it a rest.
16 posted on 09/11/2003 5:14:52 PM PDT by ambrose (Free Tommy Chong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
This is the first poll in California to use the actual ballot rather than the questioner reading just a few names. You would think that would bump up the totals for the lesser candidates. Instead, the percents for the lesser candidates went DOWN.

To understand what is happening here, read my article of a month ago, "Nuts and Bolts in California." Because this poll was conducted somewhat like the election itself, this poll is more likely to be accurate than any of the others. IMHO.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "Paying the Wrong Piper," discussion thread on FR. Article also on ChronWatch.

17 posted on 09/11/2003 5:16:00 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Everyone talks about Congress; I am doing something about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I have read some of the works by this Inyegar guy who helped design this poll. He is a heavyweight player. His articles on bias in the media are pretty solid, well-crafted research, and, surprisingly, results that tend to support our side.

That said, there is a difference between "likely" and "registered" voters. They are NOT the same.

18 posted on 09/11/2003 5:16:23 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Oral Argument in 9th Circus Punchcard Ballot (CA Recall) Case
      Posted by pogo101
On News/Activism 09/11/2003 5:14 PM PDT


U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circus ^ | September 11, 2003 | N/A (recording)
Click on this link -- a .wma file -- to hear the lengthy (!) oral argument in this case brought by the ACLU to halt the recall election, on the grounds that punchcard ballots -- the ones that reelected Gray Davis in 2002 -- aren't fair in 2003.

19 posted on 09/11/2003 5:17:00 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
Haha!

Arianna just got celebrity support from Paul Reiser and some other Hollywood celeb and she is actually SINKING---to all of ONE percent!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

(Oh, the recall/Schwarzenegger numbers looking good, but the above really is hilarious)
20 posted on 09/11/2003 5:17:14 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson