Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Supreme Court vacates stay for Hunt execution (drugs to be used check out OK)
News & Observer ^ | 9/11/03

Posted on 09/11/2003 3:09:43 PM PDT by Libloather

State Supreme Court vacates stay for Hunt execution
Thursday, September 11, 2003 5:44PM EDT
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

The state Supreme Court sided with prosecutors Thursday, allowing the execution of a man convicted of two Robeson County killings to go forward.

The court vacated the stay issued Tuesday for convicted killer Henry Lee Hunt by Robeson County Superior Court Gary Locklear, who ruled that the court should have time to review whether the state should use two drugs, not the three it now uses, for lethal injections.

The use of the word "only" when describing the lethal injection process "does not reflect a legislative intent to limit the drugs or chemicals that can be used during a lethal injection execution, but rather limits the method of execution in North Carolina solely to lethal injection instead of asphyxiation by lethal gas or some other method," the court ruled Thursday.

The court also denied Hunt's innocence claim.

Hunt's attorneys also have filed an innocence claim with the U.S. Supreme Court, attorney Stuart Meiklejohn said. Other than that, "it will be in Gov. Easley's hands, and we're hopeful he'll see merit in our clemency petition," he said.

State prosecutors and Robeson County District Johnson Britt did not immediately return phone calls seeking comment.

Hunt, 58, was sentenced to death for two Robeson County killings in 1984 but has maintained his innocence.

Hunt's lawyer argued that state law requires the use of two types of drugs -- a fast-acting barbiturate and a paralytic agent. Attorney Steven Holley said the state illegally added potassium chloride, which stops the heart, to the mixture.

Hunt's attorneys had appealed the Supreme Court to reverse Locklear's denial of a stay so a hearing could be held on Hunt's claim of innocence. Hunt said he received in prison an affidavit from a now-dead co-defendant who admitted all guilt and cleared Hunt, but the affidavit has been rejected by other judges.

This is the second time that Hunt's execution has been delayed.

It was originally scheduled for January but was stopped when lawyers challenged the state's indictment form. The state Supreme Court ultimately ruled the form constitutional.

His lawyers raised the same issue Wednesday in a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Jurors convicted Hunt in the death of Jackie Ransom, whose wife paid to have him killed to make her second marriage legal. He also was convicted of killing Larry Jones, a police informant prosecutors said knew about Ransom's killing.

Four other people were sentenced to prison for their roles in the killings. All but one has since died.

Hunt's lawyers said Wednesday night they planned to seek a full DNA report from the state on a cigarette butt for use in a possible appeal.

The butt, which prosecutors have said linked Hunt to the crime, was tested by a state lab last week, but no DNA could be recovered.

Holley has said he wants a more thorough DNA test performed to determine if there is any genetic material on the butt.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: court; execution; hunt; state; stay; supreme; vacates
...the court should have time to review whether the state should use two drugs, not the three it now uses...

What - worried that the perp would have an allergic reaction?

1 posted on 09/11/2003 3:09:43 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
I remember several years ago when a lawyer got an execution delayed because the drug being used was not approved by the FDA as safe for humans and, therefore, the doctor could not legally administer it.
2 posted on 09/11/2003 3:30:42 PM PDT by Blue Screen of Death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
...just so they swab the spot with alcohol prior to the injection, causes infection if they don't, you know.
3 posted on 09/11/2003 3:33:40 PM PDT by gorush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gorush
I can't cite the case but I am told that there was an execution delayed after the needle was inserted but, obviously, before the poison was administered. It was several months before the matter was cleared up and a new execution was scheduled so, from a medical standpoint, if not a legal one, it was wise to use a sterile needle and swab the site.
4 posted on 09/11/2003 3:40:08 PM PDT by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson