Skip to comments.
HURRICANE ISABEL becomes first Atlantic Category 5 Hurricane since 1998.....
National Hurricane Center ^
| September 11, 2003
| Pasch
Posted on 09/11/2003 1:30:19 PM PDT by John H K
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 341-343 next last
To: NautiNurse; dansangel; viligantcitizen
The new British model is out; it shows the eye hitting the coast somewhere just north of Hilton Head; Charleston & Savannah would catch the brunt of it.
241
posted on
09/12/2003 11:17:41 AM PDT
by
mhking
(Laugh while you can, monkey boy...)
D'oh! They've updated again; now it's shifting further north on that model. The GFDL model has it staying out to sea and going north parallelling the eastern seaboard, the others don't project to that point. The BAM Medium model doesn't show a northward turn at all. That model would at least point the storm toward north-central Florida.
242
posted on
09/12/2003 11:20:14 AM PDT
by
mhking
(Laugh while you can, monkey boy...)
To: My Favorite Headache
doubt its cat 5 right now....looking a little ragged, outflow not very good in a couple quadrants....
looking forward to getting the data from aircraft who are queued up to enter the storm for the first time this afternoon.
To: mhking; .45MAN; backhoe
Not good. I hope St. Simons is still there for our planned Fall getaway.
:-(
Thank you for this update. We have been tracking it because of family in FL and were under the impression it was going to swing north. This is the first time I've seen this particular model.
Heads up backhoe!
244
posted on
09/12/2003 11:33:40 AM PDT
by
dansangel
(***Never Forget!****)
To: Dog Gone
It's looking a bit healthier there, but outflow is still restricted to the SW a bit. I'll now say that the Hurricane Hunters will find winds to be 150 mph when they get out there. Still nothing to sneeze at...
245
posted on
09/12/2003 11:45:16 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(www.ArmorforCongress.com - because lawyers with a clue are rarer than truth-telling Democrats)
To: My Favorite Headache; All
You need to put some money on your mouth. Anyone here wanna hold the dough so MFH can back up his prediction of a no hitter?
I'm in for $20.
To: Rebelbase
I'm in for $50. This puppy is going to come ashore on the USA.
To: dirtboy
Apparently my link updates to the most recent shot of the hurricane, because the eye has cleaned up considerably since I first posted it. It's still in the process at the time of this post.
To: NautiNurse
That eye is incredible. Its about size of lake Okachobee.
To: Dog Gone
And it looks like the outflow to the SW is resuming, and the CDO looks like a dang Lifesaver around the eye.
250
posted on
09/12/2003 12:07:52 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(www.ArmorforCongress.com - because lawyers with a clue are rarer than truth-telling Democrats)
To: Dog Gone
It's rare for the models to agree with each other that closely four days out.
251
posted on
09/12/2003 12:08:50 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(www.ArmorforCongress.com - because lawyers with a clue are rarer than truth-telling Democrats)
To: My Favorite Headache
But it's not gonna hit us. Are you sure? The latest track stats show Isabel not only not moving north but even moving very slightly south. The forecasters say that the high pressure zone north of Isabel will be weakening in a few days, thus allowing it to move north. I'll believe it when I see it. Fortunately, Isabel is moving forward at only 9 MPH so it has a lot of time to change directions before reaching the USA.
To: dennis1x
looking forward to getting the data from aircraft who are queued up to enter the storm for the first time this afternoon. On the Weather Channel they just confirmed that the winds were 160 MPH sustained winds with gusts up to 195 MPH.
To: PJ-Comix
1st recon flight just radiod an impressive 920mb pressure....max winds around 125-130 mph. so it has probably weakened a bit since yesterday (no confirmation yesterday from aircraft of cat 5 status).
To: PJ-Comix
fyi..the weather channel just pukes up the latest report from the NHC....which we can follow on weatherundergound.com.
the 11am advisory put the winds at 160mph which is what the weather channel will report until 5. . with this recon data finally in the 5pm advisory will probably have the winds down a little, assuming future recon passes dont find a higher reading on the winds.
To: dennis1x
1st recon flight just radiod an impressive 920mb pressure....max winds around 125-130 mph. MPH or knots?
256
posted on
09/12/2003 12:17:50 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(www.ArmorforCongress.com - because lawyers with a clue are rarer than truth-telling Democrats)
To: dennis1x
I thought they said 160 MPH. BTW, I am wondering if the Space Flight movie at the IMAX theater showing images of earth from the Space Shuttle has images of hurricanes. If so, then I definitely want to see it. One of the most beautiful sights is a hurricane as seen from space.
To: dirtboy
Five day forecasts are basically worthless. They change wildly every 12 hours, or at least the models which NOAA bases them on do.
The key to this hurricane is something you mentioned earlier on the thread. It's whether the high pressure in the Atlantic holds, or is moved by the trough coming through the US.
This northwesterly turn that everyone assumes will occur isn't happening yet, and the longer that is the case, the more certain it is that this storm will hit us.
To: Rebelbase
"Liquor was left off the list."I distinctly recall standing in the line at the Kroger on the way home from work on that Thursday evening in Cary in 1996 as the winds were beginning to pick up. A couple hours earlier, Greg Fischel finally decided to give in and predict that Fran was going to cause major damage in the Raleigh area. All around me were people with multiple carts filled with the last of the bottled water, bread and batteries. Me? I'm standing there holding a case of Corona and a couple of limes.
259
posted on
09/12/2003 12:22:44 PM PDT
by
Hatteras
(where the Gulf Stream meets the Labrador Current...)
To: PJ-Comix
It wouldn't be economic to build windmills that would be efficient in such a high wind that might get used once in ten years. Maybe if they were portable so they could be moved to stay with a hurricane, but they would need to be anchored to tractors on the seabed. Could be done, technically speaking.
260
posted on
09/12/2003 12:23:18 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 341-343 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson