Skip to comments.
Schools warned of Big Brothers 'gay' risk
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Thursday, September 11, 2003
Posted on 09/10/2003 11:39:41 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: JohnHuang2
I have no problem with male homosexuals being Big Sisters or lesbians being Big Brothers!
To: Coeur de Lion
The chances of a heterosexual molesting a boy are technically zero.
That is an acceptable risk factor. No more.
3
posted on
09/10/2003 11:47:47 PM PDT
by
At _War_With_Liberals
(CNN lamented today, "Some American soldiers have even taken to calling some Iraqis' :HAJIS !")
To: At _War_With_Liberals
I agree the risk of a heterosexual molesting a boy is virtually zero, given that females molesting boys is exceptionally rare. The point I was trying to make was to confute the argument that homosexuals raise with respect to being Big Sisters or Big Brothers. That argument is that we impugn the moral character of homosexuals and that's not fair. We know that's not the issue at all. One wouldn't allow a dirty old man to be a Big Sister--now would we?
To: Coeur de Lion
I agree. Most of their arguments include a twisting of logic or common sense.
To: JohnHuang2
According to its website, BBBSA says it aims to mentormolest
400,000 children by 2004 and 1 million by 2010. That reads more factually correct
6
posted on
09/11/2003 5:55:36 AM PDT
by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
To: Coeur de Lion
The point I was trying to make was to confute the argument that homosexuals raise with respect to being Big Sisters or Big Brothers. That argument is that we impugn the moral character of homosexuals and that's not fair. The fallacy here is that 'homosexuals' have no moral character. If they did they wouldn't practice sexual abomination
In order to keep our children safe every 'homosexual' must be considered a child molester.
The first law of homosexuality:
'Homosexuals' don't reproduce, they recruit
The third law of homosexuality:
Any exposure of children to homosexual behavior is child abuse
7
posted on
09/11/2003 5:58:48 AM PDT
by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
To: JohnHuang2; scripter; *Homosexual Agenda; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; ...
Bump and ping.
Scripter will be off line until next week. I've agreed to help him out by running his homosexual agenda ping list.
A simple freepmail is all it takes to subscribe to or unsubscribe from scripter's homosexual agenda ping list. If you wish to be added to the list in scripter's absence, please FReepmail me.
8
posted on
09/11/2003 5:59:49 AM PDT
by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
To: At _War_With_Liberals; Coeur de Lion
9
posted on
09/11/2003 6:09:34 AM PDT
by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
To: John O
10
posted on
09/11/2003 6:13:31 AM PDT
by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
To: John O
"In order to keep our children safe every 'homosexual' must be considered a child molester."
That's not the point. The BBBSA does not match a teen boy with an adult woman, nor an adult man with a teen girl, to guard against sexual misconduct.
Since homosexuals are attracted to the same sex, I would think the same type of guidelines should apply. (A homosexual man would not be matched with a teen boy, etc.) At the very least, that parents should give explicit permission to match their child with a homosexual.
11
posted on
09/11/2003 6:27:38 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
To: EdReform
BTTT
12
posted on
09/11/2003 6:57:21 AM PDT
by
GrandMoM
("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
To: MEGoody
"In order to keep our children safe every 'homosexual' must be considered a child molester." That's not the point.
That's exactly the point for all the reasons you list in your post. I just come right out and say it. A 'homosexual' male cannot be trusted in the company of boys. He must be considered a child molester. Likewise a 'homosexual' woman cannot be trusted in the company of girls. She must be considered a child molester
13
posted on
09/11/2003 7:10:18 AM PDT
by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
To: John O
"A 'homosexual' male cannot be trusted in the company of boys. He must be considered a child molester."
That's fine - if you also believe that every woman must be considered a child molester and so cannot be trusted in the company of boys. I doubt you'd say that.
I would agree there are too many homos who would take advantage of this type of situation to gain access to fresh meat (similar to what they have done in the Catholic priesthood). But then, if women were allowed to mentor boys (or men allowed to mentor girls), you'd have the same issues - predators looking for fresh victims.
14
posted on
09/11/2003 9:21:30 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
To: JohnHuang2
The 99-year old Big Sisters Big Brothers, which previously had no official position on homosexual behavior, now requires its branches to accept mentors who practice it. Note the word "REQUIRES" - that means Big Brothers has been infiltrated by homos-activists and is now their tool.
"Big Brothers Big Sisters has taken the ostrich approach they are putting their heads in the sand and they are simply not addressing this problem."
Obviously that's not the case. Big Brothers knows exactly what it's doing. It's become a hunting ground for perverts.
To: JohnHuang2
Sodomite activists out recruiting among the young and gullible..especially those kids from
single parent familes ..whose emotional development is a tad behind their peers....
Perfect victims..
Sodomites do not reproduce...they recruit....
Get em while they're young and dumb...
If Big Brothers and Big Sisters are in favor of this...they are beneath contempt and financial support..
Must be another pro sodomite front organization like United Way...
16
posted on
09/11/2003 11:08:02 AM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: JohnHuang2
I don't see the problem here. The only thing being demanded is compete as SIGNED consent of the parents. In other words. WHEN something goes horribly wrong, it will be the fault of the parent because the school has a signed consent form. The school may try to PC guilt the parents into accepting (not tollerating) a homosexual big brother but I don't think that will be provable in the absence of a signed consent form.
What do the schools know that would want them to not assume the liability? (perhaps they know the "duh" answer to the "duh" question)
To: MEGoody
"A 'homosexual' male cannot be trusted in the company of boys. He must be considered a child molester." That's fine - if you also believe that every woman must be considered a child molester and so cannot be trusted in the company of boys. I doubt you'd say that.
The difference is that women are far, far, far, less likely to molest boys than 'homosexuals' are. It's a sfafe bet that your son is safe with his friend's mom. It's a safe bet that your son is in extrememe danger with the 'homosexual' down the street. Apples and oranges here. Mentally healthy women (straight) just aren't apt to molest
But then, if women were allowed to mentor boys (or men allowed to mentor girls), you'd have the same issues - predators looking for fresh victims.
Women aren't a problem with boys. Men with girls, however, is another case entirely. Men cannot be trusted alone in the company of girls. Even the strongest of men is tempted and since our nature is to reproduce and spread our seed it's better to avoid that temptation entirely. My daughter will never be alone with a man who is not her father, grandfather or husband.
18
posted on
09/15/2003 5:10:00 AM PDT
by
John O
(God Save America (Please))
To: JohnHuang2
I believe this article is only a "hint" of the actual problem - the tip of the iceberg. If the Leftist media were inclined to report the facts, the BBBSA scandal would dwarf the Catholic Church scandal. But Pederastic Priests are much more culturally acceptable targets than are Big Brothers.
19
posted on
09/15/2003 5:52:22 AM PDT
by
bimbo
To: pram
Big Brothers knows exactly what it's doing. It's become a hunting ground for perverts. I go even farther and say that "a hunting ground for perverts" is the reason the Big Brother program still exists, having been compromised by Homosexual Left.
20
posted on
09/15/2003 5:58:59 AM PDT
by
bimbo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson