1 posted on
09/09/2003 7:37:38 AM PDT by
bedolido
To: bedolido
"An estimated 1 to 2 percent who get "red" coding will be barred from boarding and face police questioning. They may be arrested."
So one out of fifty to one hundred passengers is going to flagged red??? That's going to do wonders for their business...
2 posted on
09/09/2003 7:41:34 AM PDT by
DB
(©)
To: bedolido
I often buy airline tickets less than a week ahead of time. That'll get me "yellow", I bet, especially since I'm flying from Chicago to Boston and back.
3 posted on
09/09/2003 7:41:44 AM PDT by
RonF
To: bedolido
It isn't easy being green.
4 posted on
09/09/2003 7:44:11 AM PDT by
Reeses
To: bedolido
So if you look like this you get a red flag right?
![](http://i.cnn.net/cnn/2003/WORLD/asiapcf/south/03/02/pakistan.arrests/story.ksmohammed.ap.jpg)
5 posted on
09/09/2003 7:44:30 AM PDT by
finnman69
(!)
To: bedolido
I got no problem with this. But then I'm a white male over 40.
6 posted on
09/09/2003 7:46:21 AM PDT by
kinghorse
To: bedolido
What's the deal with color coding everything?? Is it really so simple that we need only 3 categories?
8 posted on
09/09/2003 7:48:18 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: bedolido
It may turn out to be a good thing, but I can't help but suspect that in the end you will not get the best security rating unless you have been barcoded or "chipped" somehow.
Also, I would imagine that law enforcement folks tend to be particularly mean to people when they are SURE they have the right person. This system may give them a sense of false security that they can lean on you hard when you pop up as a red risk because someone stole your identity and purchased suspicious items using your identity. They will think that they are only doing good work when they lean on your like you are Osama himself and make you sit in bright light and deprive you of bathroom breaks or whatever other things police do these days to break down the bad guys. (Pretty nice compared to most of the rest of the world, I know, but then we have a greater degree of freedom here than folks like the even the relatively civilized French would ever understand.)
On the other hand, it will mean that more cases of identity theft will be uncovered, but do you want to be the person who the TSA folks are CERTAIN is a bad guy because of what some hoodlum did using your identity?
10 posted on
09/09/2003 7:49:02 AM PDT by
Montfort
To: bedolido
Great. Will we all now have our own waiting areas and drinking fountains?
13 posted on
09/09/2003 7:52:58 AM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(It's time for Arnold to stop splitting the Republican vote and step aside for the good of the party)
To: bedolido; Sir Gawain
'Homeland' Security strikes again. Note this is not part of the 87 billion the President just asked for. For that there will be an entirely different speech looking for another handout. To implement something like this will probably run a good 100 billion at least!!
16 posted on
09/09/2003 7:57:21 AM PDT by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: bedolido
Perhaps they should consider "tattoos" for a more permanent "branding"...
18 posted on
09/09/2003 8:01:37 AM PDT by
Brian S
To: bedolido
An estimated 1 to 2 percent who get "red" coding will be barred from boarding and face police questioning. They may be arrested. Are they going to be charged with anything when they are arrested, or is having a computer program declare you a red flag good enough?
21 posted on
09/09/2003 8:06:41 AM PDT by
Koblenz
(There's usually a free market solution)
To: bedolido
Most fundamental of all, this sort of profiling system simply won't work against any terrorist who has two brain cells to rub together and enough money to buy a dozen or so "dry run" flights to 1)determine with a high degree of confidence that he's been flagged "green" and 2)establish a track record that makes it even more likely that he'll be flagged "green" when it's show time.
22 posted on
09/09/2003 8:07:46 AM PDT by
steve-b
To: bedolido
I suspect I'm probably in a slim majority of people around here, but if given the free choice to apply for a 'trusted traveler' card, I'd do it today. I would object to any mandatory requirement to submit information in order to fly though.
I travel by air a lot. If it would allow me to walk into the airport about 15 or 20 minutes before my flight takes off rather than 2 or 3 hours, and a snaking line waiting to be searched (a la Oakland's airport), I'd be more than happy to get a 'trusted traveler' card.
23 posted on
09/09/2003 8:09:55 AM PDT by
tdadams
To: bedolido
Apparently no-one's looking out for the "blue meanies" any more...
30 posted on
09/09/2003 8:25:51 AM PDT by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: bedolido
When they start color-coding and then making it into the shape of a Jewish star (as in yellow Jewish star), then I'm putting my foot down.
Seems a bit simplistic to me. I think this system will make it easier for the terrorists as the screeners will start relying on the color coding more instead of their instincts (not that they are any good now). I wish I could be a screener. No one would get on! (ha ha).
To: bedolido
To: bedolido
Ah yes, for certain the idiots will color code "Red" all ninety year old grandmas while simultaneously coding "Green" all 18 to 35 year old Muslims traveling with bombs strapped to their waists.
42 posted on
09/09/2003 8:52:54 AM PDT by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Hillary for dog catcher. I met her once, she is qualified to catch dogs.)
To: bedolido
This system is already in place in Europe.
To: Travis McGee; Jeff Head; wardaddy; TEXASPROUD
Awwww fuschia !
62 posted on
09/09/2003 11:26:54 AM PDT by
Squantos
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson