Posted on 09/08/2003 12:25:49 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:06 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Excellent work JohnHuang2 ! Thanks for posting your article and for the ping !
"For America," added Bush, "there will be no going back to the era before September the 11th, 2001 -- to false comfort in a dangerous world. We have learned that terrorist attacks are not caused by the use of strength; they are invited by the perception of weakness. And the surest way to avoid attacks on our own people is to engage the enemy where he lives and plans. We are fighting that enemy in Iraq and Afghanistan today so that we do not meet him again on our own streets, in our own cities."
"A presidential executive order issued during the Clinton
administration hamstrung the FBI so badly that bureau
lawyers decided it would be illegal to infiltrate Osama bin
Laden's terrorist training camps in Afghanistan, a senior
FBI official during the Clinton administration said Saturday."
(June 1, 2002)
____________________
"I don't believe 9-11 happened because of an intelligence breach," Quayle told Fox News Channel's "Hannity & Colmes.""I think it was really a policy breach. It was the inaction of the previous administration, by and large, that al Qaeda -- and bin Laden in particular -- thought that they could hit the United States, and there would be a retaliation maybe of a cruise missile but nothing more than that," he explained.
The comments make the former vice president, who served under President Bush's father from 1989 to 1993, the highest ranking former U.S. official to suggest that the Clinton administration should get the lion's share of the blame for not preventing the 9-11 attacks.
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.
(((JH multi-lateral ping!)))
Once again, Bush sets the agenda, defines the terms of debate, the course for action, the meaning of success. That's what a leader does. That's what Bush did tonight.
Ping list: on/off, please Freepmail.
Oh, thank you !! :O)
Re #27, 31, 36: Thank you, folks ! :O)JohnHuang2 is always hittin' 'em outta da park !!
JH2 attacks the RATs "like a doberman on a hambone", says Dennis Miller.
As does the Meekster.
I find the choice of using the phrase "civilized world" a very subtle but an extremely powerful rhetorical device. Last September, Bush used the threat of the UN being irrelevent as a means to get 1441 passed. It worked. While the threat of irrelevancy is still there, the rhetoric is now being moved to "Who is part of the civilized world? France, Germany and the UN are you going to side with the barbarians?" To call these people uncivilized is the ultimate insult to their way overblown egos.
Thus, the reason for going to the UN is to either expose France and Germany for who they really are -- allies of the barbarians -- or force them to comply with the "civilized world". Anyone who thinks we are going to the UN because we are "failing miserably" in Iraq is sadly mistaken. Instead, we are forcing France, Germany and the UN in general to play their hand. Bush is either going to get his resolution or the UN's inability to be part of the civilized world will render it irrelevant. My bet is that Bush will get his resolution just like last fall and then some -- perhaps some much needed institutional reform at the UN.
This is strategy of the highest order folks. Sun Tzu couldn't have done it better himself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.