Replies

I wrote:
" Syria is a Baathist regime that killed 20000 Syrians to quel and Islamist riot in Hama. That does not stop them from working with Iran, Hizbullah, and Hamas."

A. Pole responded
I see. So you believe that WTC bombers were from Syria and Iraq? Or that they were from Iran and belonged to Hezbollah or Hamas? I know, they all look the same, those darkies (even if some of them have Stalin's mustache).

1. Were the racial comments necessary. Regarding race, I have Mizrachi and Yemeni-Jewish in-laws.
Regarding color, my mother's brother is dark enough to be mistaken for a middle Easterner. (He was actually born in Warsaw)

2. I was responding to your ridiculous assertion that because the Iraqi Ba'athis regime was secular it would not work with Islamist terrorists. I shot down that assertion by noting the relationship between the Syrian Ba'athist regime with Hizbullah and Hamas. I should have also added Amal. (They are also protectors of various neoMarxist groups including the DFLP and the PKK.)

As far as Iraq's involvement in 9-11, that is still an open question.
WE know that the Iraqis trained terrorists in hijaaking technics at Salman Pak.
An Iraqi diplomat in the Philippenes was expelled for working with Abu Sayyaf. Abu Sayyaf is the Filippino branch of Al Qaeda.
Iraq has funded Hamas and Islamic Jihad operations against Israel. Islamic Jihad is a constituent group of Al Qaeda. QED.
Ayman al-Zawahiri, the operations cheif for Al Qaeda met with Iraqi intelligence on multiple occasions.

Ramzi Yossef, from the first WTC attack entered the US on an Iraqi visa. Many intelligence experts belive he was an Iraqi agent who also had ties to Egyptian Islamic Jihad.

http://www.theweeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/033jgqyi.asp
http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2003/1/30/112554
http://washingtontimes.com/national/20030729-093909-9839r.htm

While I have seen no conclusive evidence regarding Iraq's involvement in 9-11, Iraq's connections to Al-Qaeda are quite strong.

, Iraq's connections to Al-Qaeda are quite strong.

Well, then, what about our two 'allies', SA and P? The case agains them is so obvious it doesn't need to be proven, they support slamofascists, propagandamullas, have nukes, chem, biowarweapons etc. etc. Saddy may have been many things and the war was just, but not for the terrorista reasons.

I know, they all look the same, those darkies (even if some of them have Stalin's mustache).

1. Were the racial comments necessary. Regarding race, I have Mizrachi and Yemeni-Jewish in-laws. Regarding color, my mother's brother is dark enough to be mistaken for a middle Easterner. (He was actually born in Warsaw)

You see, so it is in your interest to promote rational attitude and NOT to promote insane generalizations and hysteria. Don't you know how some Sikhs were attacked as a revange for September 11?

If aggresive fools can confuse Saudi terrorists with Sikhs they can confuse them with you or your relatives. Watch out what attitudes you are promoting.

As far as Iraq's involvement in 9-11, that is still an open question.

Yeah, and so the many theories about JFK assasination are still open.