To: rmlew
, Iraq's connections to Al-Qaeda are quite strong.
Well, then, what about our two 'allies', SA and P? The case agains them is so obvious it doesn't need to be proven, they support slamofascists, propagandamullas, have nukes, chem, biowarweapons etc. etc. Saddy may have been many things and the war was just, but not for the terrorista reasons.
83 posted on
09/04/2003 1:16:53 AM PDT by
Cronos
('slam and sanity don't mix, ask your Imam.....)
To: Cronos
Well, then, what about our two 'allies', SA and P? The case agains them is so obvious it doesn't need to be proven, they support slamofascists, propagandamullas, have nukes, chem, biowarweapons etc. etc. Saddy may have been many things and the war was just, but not for the terrorista reasons.
The Saudis are difficult. It is possible that Prince Turiq al-Faisal was involved in 9-11 and in the recent attack on UN HQ in Baghdad.
3 of the more fundamentalist princes died in the week after 9-11.
The Pakistani government is officially helping us. However, the ISI (Pakistani intelligence) is full of Islamists. (they created the Taliban and are running terrorist operations in India).
The problem is that Pakistan has Nuclear weapons and is allied to China.
We can't hit Saudi Arabia until we get alternate sources of oil. That may have been a reason to hit Iraq first. (the Saudis should worry if we take out Hugo Chavez of Venezuala)
91 posted on
09/04/2003 3:17:57 PM PDT by
rmlew
("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson