Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medicare: Young People Pay Attention or Pay the Bills
Scripps Howard wire from the Heritage Foundation ^ | 19 August 2003 | Derek Hunter

Posted on 09/03/2003 9:18:00 AM PDT by tralfaz7

Young Americans: Pay Attention, Or Pay The Bills by Derek Hunter August 19, 2003 | |

If you’re in your 20s or 30s, one of the biggest decisions affecting your life likely will be made this fall.

It’s not whether to get married. Or to buy a house. Or even to have and educate children. But it’s a decision that could affect your ability to afford any or all of those things.

That decision, which will be made by Congress, is whether or not to give senior citizens, regardless of income or need, a prescription-drug entitlement in Medicare.

The House and Senate each have approved separate bills that would add a drug entitlement to the already cash-strapped Medicare program. Each bill was initially estimated to cost $400 billion over the next 10 years. New estimates peg them as being far more costly. Still, a Capitol Hill committee is hammering out the differences between the bills, and President Bush has indicated he’ll sign whatever they put before him.

Our futures are being formed. But are we paying attention? Frankly, most lawmakers don’t expect us to: We rarely make plans for the weekend until Friday rolls around, so it’s a good bet we’re not planning what will happen when we reach age 65 -- or how we’ll obtain medical care when we get there.

But there’s one very good reason we should pay attention as lawmakers tinker with Medicare. We (not they) will have to pay the bills.

Think about the extra $400 billion in taxes we’ll have to pay over the next 10 years.

That’s $400,000,000,000. How huge is that?

To give it some perspective, if you were paid $1 per second, every second of every day from the moment you were born, you’d be a millionaire in fewer than 12 days. But it would take you nearly 33 years to become a billionaire. That’s right, 33 YEARS.

And still, to get the estimated cost of the proposed “reform,” you must multiply that 33 years by 400. The resulting number should worry everyone -- especially young people.

Here’s why: The 77 million baby boomers will begin retiring in 2011. Eventually, that’ll nearly double the number of people on Medicare. By 2030, the typical household will pay $2,855 for Medicare, according to estimates from The Heritage Foundation. That’s without a drug entitlement. Factor one in, and that number rises to $3,980 per household.

Heritage research also finds that between now and 2030, each household will pay an average $56,022 for Medicare, $16,127 of that for the drug entitlement alone.

Essentially, lawmakers are considering imposing a massive tax liability on young people. Keep in mind that while the cost of Medicare skyrockets, the cost of the rest of government (defense, Social Security, etc.) also will continue to rise, and we will have to pay for that, too.

There are poor seniors who genuinely need help and should get it. But three out of four seniors already have some form of drug coverage, many through former employers.

So why would Congress design a benefit for everyone when only a quarter of seniors need it, and make us pay for it? As we’ve seen, this bill covers everyone equally, rich or poor. Bill Gates, Ted Turner, Michael Jordan and all the other rich retirees won’t go hungry if they pay out-of-pocket for prescription drugs.

What’s worse, one-third of seniors with drug coverage through their former employers would lose it because of this bill, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates. Companies would save billions of dollars a year by dropping retirees because the taxpayer would automatically pick up the tab. So we get stuck with the check. Talk about corporate welfare.

But it doesn’t have to be like this. We could make it better, for seniors and ourselves.

All we have to do is pay attention -- and now. Seniors vote in large numbers. They contact their members of Congress and stay involved. Unfortunately, too many of us in our 20s or 30s know who won on “Survivor” or “American Idol” but can’t name our senator or congressional representative.

We have to change that. Members of Congress need to listen, and so do our parents and grandparents. Let’s help those seniors who truly need help with their drug bills. But let Bill Gates and friends pay their own way.

No one is going to seek out our opinions. We have to speak up. We have to be engaged. We’d better start paying attention because, either way, we will pay.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: afghancaves; bush; congress; democrat; economy; future; health; healthcare; medicare; money; president; republican; socializedmedicine
Medicare isn't just for the elderly. It is the young who are going to pay!
1 posted on 09/03/2003 9:18:02 AM PDT by tralfaz7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tralfaz7
Pay attention BUMP.
2 posted on 09/03/2003 9:22:04 AM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tralfaz7
I agree it's a lousy problem, but we may be in too deep to do much about it without causing a lot of pain and suffering. That's what happens when sheeple stand by and watch program after program go into effect without nipping it in the bud - eventually entropy carries it on and nothing short of tearing it all down and starting over will "fix" it.
3 posted on 09/03/2003 9:25:42 AM PDT by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tralfaz7
There are so many young people who believe in socialism, it would be great if this will help them wake up to the reality of it, but I don't think it will.
4 posted on 09/03/2003 9:30:18 AM PDT by angry elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tralfaz7
Let’s help those seniors who truly need help with their drug bills.

Sheesh. There's a surrender that is near Gallic in its swiftness....

The proper thing to do is wipe the entire damned slate clean and start over. Put everything on the table (to mix metaphors). Let's build government services from the ground up, and eliminate the crap our predecessors left us.

Interstate highways? Check. Social Security? Not so fast. Military? Check. Arts funding? Uh-uh.

The simple truth is that regardless of the addition of a stupid prescription benefit, entitlements swallow a majority of the budget every year. It's going to get worse. It's time to stop this stupid train and fix it before we crash. WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE.

5 posted on 09/03/2003 9:40:01 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
It's time to bring in competition to Medicare. That is the only way it will survive.
6 posted on 09/03/2003 9:42:40 AM PDT by tralfaz7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tralfaz7
I don't think most young people are against this sort of program. Most are in lower income brackets and may be staying there for a long time. They also see socialized medicine in England and Canada and think it attractive because it is "free".

They also see the high costs of medical care, and don't want to pay large insurance fees or out of pocket expenses as what discretionary income they have they want to spend on their current wants, whether cars or entertainment. So, they figure the government can and should prvide "free" medical care to them.

What they don't realize yet is "they" are the government and will be stuck with the bills. But many don't see it that way. Frankly, most have been dumbed down to the dangers of creeping socialism and don't see the connection nor do they care if the quality of care goes down. After all, they don't use it so much. Also, they want it to take care of the old people in their families so they aren't stuck with the bills or whatever inheritance they may have isn't eaten up by medical expenses.

It's a very selfish game they are playing and the politicians are pandering to it with both hands.

7 posted on 09/03/2003 9:55:19 AM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: *Socialized Medicine; hocndoc
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
9 posted on 09/03/2003 10:03:03 AM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tralfaz7
Think about the extra $400 billion in taxes we’ll have to pay over the next 10 years.

Still it will be less than 10 years of nation "building" in Iraq. Neocons want to start the same project in Iran which would be three times larger. I guess that neocons prefer to dump the American seniors and the disabled in order to play global chess.

10 posted on 09/03/2003 10:05:11 AM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tralfaz7
It's time to bring in competition to Medicare.

You mean neocon foreign adventures?

11 posted on 09/03/2003 10:06:23 AM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tralfaz7
All major entitlement programs need to be means tested. Either we restrict them to the median income or lower, or we will not be able to afford their constant drain on our economy. Particularly when the Baby Boom retires and the number of claimants goes skyward.

We can either moderate these programs or we very dramatically default on them and leave a lot of very angry, confused people wondering why their country promised them a bunch of things and then pulled out the rug.
12 posted on 09/03/2003 10:51:55 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (More Americans 18-49 Watch The Cartoon Network than CNN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tralfaz7
More red tape, more money sucking piggies. Less government? I don't think so if they vote for this crud. I would rather have the money to help my retired parents than have it yanked from my hands telling me how to spend it.
13 posted on 09/03/2003 11:00:39 AM PDT by teeples (A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1
ping
14 posted on 09/03/2003 11:02:53 AM PDT by Fraulein (TCB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fraulein
More red tape, more money sucking piggies.

The real money sucking piggies are the drug makers, and medical services providers. I can understand fair compensation, but just a quick glance at the rate of their price increases indicates how little competition we really have. Drive the prices for goods and services to better align with the economy and the crisis will be abated.
15 posted on 09/03/2003 11:21:49 AM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA; teeples
I think your comment was meant for teeples?
16 posted on 09/03/2003 11:25:35 AM PDT by Fraulein (TCB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
As a former resident of Canada I can tell you that social medicine is in no way free...I used to pay almost half my paycheck to the commie red-bastard Chretien government for their BS unionised essential services, healthcare being the biggest...Boy I sure don't miss that BS lie from the Utopian Workers Paradise of Canuckistan...

It is true that the younger generation will inherit one of the biggest scams to come along after social security...
17 posted on 09/03/2003 1:46:58 PM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
The real money sucking piggies are the drug makers, and medical services providers.

I know you do not want to hear this, but you are entirely wrong. Providers ARE NOT SUCKING PIGGIES. My reimbursement is, in fact, tied to medicare standard. Tell me how you find me a money sucking pig when my reimbursement rate per hour is less than taking your computer to be fixed, or labor for a mechanic? Please do not levy charges that are lies. You are perpetuating the problem, not the solution. If the general public were more advised of what the average practicioner goes through in a day, you would not make such an ignorant statement.

18 posted on 09/03/2003 4:02:51 PM PDT by gas_dr (Trial lawyers are Endangering Every Patient in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
If the general public were more advised of what the average practicioner goes through in a day, you would not make such an ignorant statement.

If the general public were aware of how the medical system actually works they would take up their pitch forks and storm the glass towers. The issue isn't the doctors, or the hourly rate, it is the formulary. In order to prescribe basic medication you are required to perform a vast range of wasteful testing. Yes, the hourly rate is a matter of public policy; charging the maximum amount of hours and loading the system with the maximum amount of billable testing is wasteful.
19 posted on 09/03/2003 5:44:28 PM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson