Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS: How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror
regnery.com ^ | 9.2.03 | various, Mia T

Posted on 09/02/2003 1:14:10 PM PDT by Mia T

MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror
(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)

 

Losing bin Laden: How Bill Clinton’s Failures Unleashed Global Terror
by Richard Miniter
Regnery Publishing, Inc.; ISBN: 0895260743
Hardcover - 256 pages (September 2003)

Years before the public knew about bin Laden, Bill Clinton did. Bin Laden first attacked Americans during Clinton’s presidential transition in December 1992. He struck again at the World Trade Center in February 1993. Over the next eight years the archterrorist’s attacks would escalate killing hundreds and wounding thousands&emdash;while Clinton did his best to stymie the FBI and CIA and refused to wage a real war on terror.

Why?

The answer is here in investigative reporter Richard Miniter’s stunning exposé that includes exclusive interviews with both of Clinton’s National Security Advisors, Clinton’s counter-terrorism czar, his first CIA director, his Secretary of State, his Secretary of Defense, top CIA and FBI agents, lawmakers from both parties and foreign intelligence officials from France, Sudan, Egypt, and the United Arab Emirates, as well as on the-scene coverage from Sudan, Egypt, and elsewhere.

In Losing bin Laden you’ll learn:

  • The new evidence that Clinton knew about Sudan’s offers to arrest bin Laden&emdash;and why he ignored them

  • The never before told story of the Saudi government attempt to assassinate bin Laden

  • Why Bill Clinton refused to meet with his first director of Central Intelligence

  • Drawn from secret Sudanese intelligence files, the never-before-told story of Bin Laden’s role in shooting down America’s Black Hawk helicopters in Mogadishu, Somalia&emdash;and how Clinton manipulated the news media to keep the worst off America’s TV screens

  • How Clinton ignored intelligence and offers of cooperation against bin Laden from Afghanistan’s Northern Alliance

  • How Bill Clinton scuttled a secret offer from the United Arab Emirates to arrest bin Laden

  • The 1993 World Trade Center attack&emdash;why Clinton refused to believe it had been bombed; why the CIA was kept out of the investigation; and how one of the FBI’s most trusted informants was actually a double agent working for bin Laden

  • Why the CIA never funded bin Laden&emdash;despite the liberal myths

  • How Clinton ignored Yemen’s pleas for help in arresting bin Laden&emdash;in 1993

  • The untold story of a respected Congressman who repeatedly warned Clinton officials about bin Laden in 1993&emdash;and why he was ignored

  • Revealed for the first time: how Clinton and a Democratic Senator stopped the CIA from hiring Arabic translators&emdash;while phone intercepts from bin Laden remained untranslated

  • How the Predator spy plane&emdash;which spotted bin Laden three times&emdash;was grounded by bureaucratic infighting.

  • Plus much more, including, appendices of secret documents and photos, as well as the established links between bin Laden and Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.

Losing bin Laden is a dramatic, page-turning read, a riveting account of a terror war that bin Laden openly declared, but that Clinton left largely unfought. With a pounding narrative, up-close characters and detailed scenes, it takes you inside the Oval Office, the White House Situation Room and within some of the deadliest terrorist cells that America has ever faced. If Clinton had fought back, the attacks on September 11, 2001 might never have happened.

Losing bin Laden is a story&emdash;and one hell of a lesson&emdash;that the reader will never forget.

EXCERPTS:
Losing bin Laden: How Bill Clinton's Failures Unleashed Global Terror
Miniter, Richard

"[CIA Director] Woolsey tried to establish a rapport with the president. Sometimes he would accompany the CIA briefing officer to the White House for the daily intelligence briefing. He hoped the President would invite him in, as was customary in past Administrations. Though the President was told that Woolsey was waiting outside in an anteroom, Clinton never asked to see him."


"This frank report reveals that the CIA and other senior policymakers knew about bin Laden-related intelligence failures as early as 1996 -- five years before the September 11 attacks -- and did little about them. It also shows that CIA director Woolsey's concerns were correct. But he couldn't get Clinton's help to beef up funding for the recruitment of local sources. He couldn't even get a meeting with Clinton. So America was in the dark, as bin Laden plotted."


"The New York FBI office knew about a growing network of Islamic extremists in the tri-state area, but the agents couldn't even open a full investigation. . . . And, in 1993, the idea of punishing small, seemingly insignificant crimes as a way of preventing larger ones had not yet taken hold. The FBI was aware that many Islamic radicals were training with weapons at Connecticut and Pennsylvania gun ranges. . . ."


"Saddam Hussein's punishment for plotting to kill a former American President [George Bush] was the destruction of an empty building in central Baghdad. Clinton, who exercised the death penalty in his home state for convicted murderers, wanted to minimize casualties. The missile strike was most likely not seen as a sign of strength by an Iraqi dictator who would casually order executions over lunch."


"The next crisis came on August 8 [1993], when a U.S. Army humvee drove down a rough road in southern Mogadishu. Concealed in a pothole was a land mine. A wire ran from the mine to a nearby building. A Somali spotter watched the vehicle approach. When the humvee was in position, he clicked the detonator. Four American military policemen were murdered. . . . Again, the President took no action."



TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: California; US: Illinois; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abuseofpower; bill911; billclinton; binladen; clinton911; clintoncorruption; clintoncowardice; clintonfailure; clintons911; hillary; hillary911; hillaryclinton; richardminiter; wot; wtc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Mia T
YES! I was hoping you would put together a thread featuring "Losing Bin Laden". Great work as always, Mia!
41 posted on 09/02/2003 10:25:48 PM PDT by nutmeg (Is the DemocRATic party extinct yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
bttt
42 posted on 09/02/2003 11:44:21 PM PDT by nutmeg (Is the DemocRATic party extinct yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
Thx. ;)
43 posted on 09/03/2003 1:23:23 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
bump!
44 posted on 09/03/2003 1:24:01 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
thx. :)
45 posted on 09/03/2003 1:24:58 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: All

 

EXCERPT:

OHN O'Neill, the new FBI section chief for counter-terrorism, spent the night of March 8, 1995, studying a rambling communiqué from a little-known Saudi expatriate named Osama bin Laden.

At the time, U.S. terrorism experts believed the biggest threats were Hezbollah and Hamas, not something called al Qaeda.

A few days after he read bin Laden's angry denunciation of the Saudi royal family for allowing U.S. military bases in their country, O'Neill arrived at a meeting with FBI Deputy Director Robert "Bear" Bryant armed with a developing belief that bin Laden was in fact the world's most pressing threat.

Bryant was impressed.

"The first time I ever heard of bin Laden was from John O'Neill," he recalled. ONeill also began discussing bin Laden with Richard Clarke, the national coordinator for counter-terrorism.

O'Neill compared bin Laden to a young Adolf Hitler, making ominous threats that no one took seriously.

"It's like 'Mein Kampf,' he said. "Men you read what this guy says he's going to do, he's serious."

In the next three years, O'Neill investigated al Qaeda's bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, was named special agent in charge of the national security division of the FBI's New York office and delivered a speech warning that terrorists could strike on U.S. soil at any time.

He was awake at 4 a.m. on Aug. 7, 1998, when the encrypted telephone rang at his Peter Cooper Village home. Two U.S. embassies, in Kenya and Tanzania, had been bombed.

He was the first to call the FBI office at 26 Federal Plaza, recalled Detective Pat Pogan.

"We have to get moving on this," O'Neill said. "I know who did this. It's bin Laden."

O'Neill wanted to fly to Africa to lead the investigation. The bombings had killed 247 people. His New York office had the expertise about bin Laden and he was upset when he was told to wait. But he was outraged later that month when President Clinton, three days after his televised admission about Monica Lewinsky, went on TV again to announce, "Today we have struck back."

U.S. Tomahawk missiles were fired at a bin Laden camp in Afghanistan and a pharmaceutical plant in the Sudan that intelligence sources identified as a chemical weapons facility.

O'Neill immediately believed that Clinton launched the attack to deflect attention from the Lewinsky scandal and his impending impeachment.

He and a few people side a tight circle of national. security officials also knew that Clinton was using old intelligence in selecting the targets.

In fact, it was as much as a year out of date, not nearly fresh enough to justify the launch of a surgically precise air assault.

O'Neill wasn't the only major FBI figure who was upset. Amazingly, the White House had failed to notify FBI Director Louis Freeh -- who had just arrived in Kenya. Freeh and Clinton already had a frosty relationship. Hundreds of Freeh's agents were investigate the bombings in two heavily Muslim countries that were loaded with bin Laden sympathizers.

"Freeh was pissed" said Lewis Schiliro, then head of the New York FBI office, who was with Freeh.

"We had agents on the streets, exposed and wearing FBI jackets, and the White House was firing in missiles. What better targets for reprisals than the FBI?'

The missile strikes had no appreciable military impact. But the bombing probe that followed defined the structure of al Qaeda and identified its leaders and key soldiers. Mary Jo White, former U.S. attorney, credits O'Neill.

"I cannot overstate it," she said. "John O'Neill in the investigation of the African embassy bombings created a template for all international terrorism investigations."

0'NEILL and Freeh had great respect for each other, but in some ways they could not have been more different...

 MURRAY WEISS, The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)

 

The Man Who Warned America is the mesmerizing story of John P. O'Neill, a flashy, larger-than-life FBI Special Agent who was one of the first people in counterterrorism to understand the threat posed to the United States by Islamic fundamentalists -- particularly al Qaeda. For years he monitored Osama bin Laden's activities, and was convinced that the terrorist mastermind would one day strike on U.S. soil. When he did strike on September 11, 2001, John O'Neill was among those killed in the World Trade Center, his unheeded warnings now tragically proven correct. Remarked a fellow terror expert, "He chased bin Laden all over the world and bin Laden caught up with him."

Author Murray Weiss here presents a respectful and vivid portrait of the brilliant, insightful, dogged, and creative O'Neill. He traces his adventurous and highly successful career as a Special Agent, during which he tracked down suspects including wily pornographers. But most importantly, Weiss recounts in impressive detail how this indefatigable and resourceful patriot tried in vain for years to alert the nation's chief guardians to the threat of militant Islam.

Weiss recounts how, as long ago as 1994, O'Neill told Bill Clinton's top counterterrorism advisers that Osama bin Laden was not just a "financier," as the CIA then referred to him, but was building a worldwide terrorist network and planning to target the United States. When terrorist Ramzi Yousef boasted, "Next time, we'll take the towers down," O'Neill was virtually alone in insisting that the terrorists could and would do just that.

As such, this book is much more than just the story of one man who loved his country and tried to save her from tragedy and disaster; it is a story of administrative ineptitude, indifference, and misplaced priorities that should serve as a warning to present and future government officials so that 9/11 is never repeated. A sampling of what John O'Neill knew about numerous key terrorism-related areas:

 

  • Our allies in Riyadh: "Everything needed to dismantle Osama bin Laden's organization can be found in Saudi Arabia"

     

  • Osama bin Laden: "It's like Mein Kampf. . . . When you read what the guy says he's going to do, he's serious. There are a lot of people who support him"

     

  • Foreign terrorist organizations: "They have the capacity to strike American soil any time they choose"

     

  • Why investigators were wrong in focusing on state sponsors of terrorism: "[Terrorists] are bound by a jihad, a religious belief as opposed to any nation or state"

 

Plus, you'll also learn:

 

  • How O'Neill forged a vast worldwide law enforcement network that formed the foundation for today's global anti-terrorist efforts

     

  • Our foreign policy in the Middle East: why O'Neill thought it was self-defeating for the U.S. to get entangled with the internal affairs of Saudi Arabia and its neighbors

     

  • How O'Neill determined that the destruction of TWA Flight 800 was not caused by a surface-to-air missile

     

  • Three watershed events that convinced O'Neill that the threat of Islamic terrorism was far more immediate than anyone else was willing to acknowledge

     

  • "The Lewinsky affair just hung over everything": why, no matter how compelling his evidence and arguments about terrorism were, O'Neill could never make a believer out of Bill Clinton or his National Security Council

     

  • Why O'Neill was enraged by Clinton's 1998 air strikes against supposed terrorist targets in Sudan

     

  • Osama bin Laden: how the inept Clinton actually added to his popularity in the Islamic world

     

  • How even Rudolph Giuliani brushed off the warnings of impending catastrophe from O'Neill

     

"A phenomenal piece of reporting and writing that grabs you and won't let go until the last page. Like no other book, it takes you inside the dirty secrets of America's internal wars in the fight against terrorism before 9/11. Based on unprecedented access to intelligence and law enforcement officials, The Man Who Warned America will surely be recognized as one of the very best books ever written on why 9/11 happened." -- Steven Emerson, author of American Jihad: The Terrorists Living Among Us

"Much like Winston Churchill, John O'Neill tried to warn his fellow countrymen of an approaching storm of catastrophic proportions. A crime-busting superhero and a flamboyant bon vivant, he 'connected the dots' before most even knew there were dots. Murray Weiss uses his exceptional working knowledge of the history of terrorism and shows, through O'Neill's challenged and conflicted life, a man who tried to win the war that cannot be lost." -- Clint Van Zandt, former FBI chief hostage negotiator, criminal profiler, and NBC-TV analyst

What did he know. . . and when did he know it ?

by Mia T

5.17.02

 

"The instant that second plane hit, I said to the person with whom I was speaking, 'Bin Laden did this.' I knew immediately. I know what this network can do."

bill clinton

Clinton's FBI Learned In 1995 Of Plot To Use Terror Jetliner

Allan Favish via post on 10/3/01 4:22 AM Pacific by Mia T

Borderless Network of Terror
Bin Laden Followers Reach Across Globe

By Doug Struck, Howard Schneider, Karl Vick and Peter Baker
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, September 23, 2001; Page A01

MANILA -- Abdul Hakim Murad washed his hands, and broke a basic rule of bombmaking.

When the water mixed with chemical residue in the kitchen sink of unit 603 in the Dona Josefa Apartments here in 1995, it set off an eruption that would reveal the inner workings of a clandestine terrorist cell allied with Osama bin Laden.

It also revealed a plan that gave a chilling preview of the attack in New York and Washington on Sept. 11.

Arrested and tortured by Philippine intelligence agents, Murad told the story of "Bojinka" -- "loud bang" -- the code name bin Laden operatives had given to an audacious plan to bomb 11 U.S. airliners simultaneously and fly an airplane into the CIA headquarters in Langley, Va...

COMPLETE ARTICLE

Struck reported from Manila, Schneider from Amman and Cairo, Vick from Aden and Baker from Tashkent. Staff writer Bill Branigin contributed to this report.

© 2001 The Washington Post Company

Clinton Warned on Bin Laden Hijack-Kamikaze Plot

Newsmax | 05.16.02

If you don't recall seeing the blaring post-9-11 headline "Clinton Warned on Bin Laden Hijack-Kamikaze Plot," it's not because your memory is failing.

In fact, the big media mostly ignored the story - in marked contrast to today's wall-to-wall coverage of news that President Bush received a pre-9-11 CIA briefing on a possible bin Laden hijack plot.

And while the warning transmitted to Bush gave no inkling that bin Laden planned to transform U.S. airliners into flying bombs and slam them into American office buildings, in fact, Clinton administration intelligence officials were in the possession of detailed information on an al Qaeda conspiracy to hijack several U.S. airliners - including a plan to crash one of the planes into the Pentagon or CIA.

It was called "Operation Bojinka," a 1995 plot hatched by an al Qaeda cell in the Philippines with an eye towards blowing up 12 American airliners. Some would be booby trapped with bombs like Pan Am 103, others hijacked like the four U.S. jets commandeered on 9-11 and crashed into buildings.

Though the mainstream press never demonstrated much enthusiasm for the story, Accuracy in Media's Reed Irvine detailed what the Clinton administration knew - and when it knew it - for NewsMax.com last October.

Citing a Sept. 13 Agence France-Presse report, Irvine noted that Philippine Police Chief Superintendent Avelino Razon had uncovered the plot to "plant bombs in U.S. airliners and hijack others to crash them into buildings like the CIA headquarters."

"Razon said (the plot) was found on the computer of Ramzi Yousef, the organizer of the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center," Irvine reported. "He had fled to Pakistan, but his laptop was found in the apartment he shared with his accomplice, Abdul Hakim Murad. Razon said both were agents of Osama bin Laden."

A later Agence France-Press report noted:

"Among targets mentioned (in Yousef's computer files) was the World Trade Center in New York..... CIA offices in Virginia and the Sears Tower in Chicago."

Picking up where Irvine left off, the Washington Post quoted a Filipino investigator, who said that as he watched the attack on the World Trade Center on television he exclaimed in horror, "It's Bojinka. We told the Americans everything about Bojinka. Why didn't they pay attention?"

Chief Police Superintendent Avelino Razon told the Philippine Daily Inquirer that the Philippine intelligence report was passed on to the U.S. Embassy and the U.S. Joint Task Force on Terrorism.

"It was not given credibility. Otherwise, it could have prevented the destruction of the World Trade Center," he explained.

The Clinton FBI was in full possession of all the frightening facts on Bojinka, but did nothing. Instead, as Reed Irvine revealed, the bureau assured Congress that everything was under control.

"In testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee subcommittee on Terrorism in February 1998, 'Bojinka' - which means 'big bang' - was described by Dale L. Watson, chief of the International Terrorism Operations Section of the FBI, only as a plot to blow up 'numerous U.S. air carriers.'

"He said that the FBI had identified 'a significant and growing organizational presence' of foreign terrorists in the United States. He swore the bureau had them under control."

The Clinton FBI counterintelligence chief told the Senate that as a result of the bombings of the World Trade Center in 1993 and the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995 the FBI had developed an 'enhanced capability' to track terrorist activities.

Is it likely that U.S. intelligence possessed this much information on al Qaeda plans to slam planes into U.S. buildings - and didn't tell President Clinton?

Actually it is, if you believe the account of his former CIA Director James Woolsey, who said Clinton never bothered to meet with him during his stint as the nation's intelligence chief.

What about other administration officials, like Attorney General Janet Reno, who certainly should have known about Bojinka?

There Clinton may also have an alibi.

During all of 1998 - the same year FBI counterintelligence briefed Congress on the al Qaeda hijack plot - Clinton met with his Cabinet exactly twice: Once in January to lie to them about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, and again in August to come clean about the affair.

Want to know more about why U.S intelligence missed the 9-11 clues during the Clinton years. Get your copy of NewsMax.com's "Off the Record" interview with FBI whistleblower Gary Aldrich.

Clinton's failure to grasp the opportunity to unravel increasingly organized extremists, coupled with Berger's assessments of their potential to directly threaten the U.S., represents one of the most serious foreign policy failures in American history

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize

The clintons' failures unleashed global terror. QED
Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?



46 posted on 09/03/2003 1:26:45 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
UPDATED LINK TO MANSOOR IJAZ ARTICLE

As an American Muslim and a political supporter of Clinton, I feel now, as I argued with Clinton and Berger then, that their counter-terrorism policies fueled the rise of Bin Laden from an ordinary man to a Hydra-like monster.

... Clinton's failure to grasp the opportunity to unravel increasingly organized extremists, coupled with Berger's assessments of their potential to directly threaten the U.S., represents one of the most serious foreign policy failures in American history

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize

The clintons' failures unleashed global terror. QED
Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?


47 posted on 09/03/2003 1:50:03 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: All
 

UDAY: "I think the end is near" because "this time I think the Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."

Q ERTY9

BUSH: "I will not wait on events, while dangers gather."

 

video screen capure

multimedia

President's Remarks
video image view

This country has many challenges. We will not deny, we will not ignore, we will not pass along our problems to other Congresses, to other presidents, and other generations. (Applause.) We will confront them with focus and clarity and courage...

Sending Americans into battle is the most profound decision a President can make. The technologies of war have changed; the risks and suffering of war have not. For the brave Americans who bear the risk, no victory is free from sorrow. This nation fights reluctantly, because we know the cost and we dread the days of mourning that always come.

We seek peace. We strive for peace. And sometimes peace must be defended. A future lived at the mercy of terrible threats is no peace at all. If war is forced upon us, we will fight in a just cause and by just means -- sparing, in every way we can, the innocent. And if war is forced upon us, we will fight with the full force and might of the United States military -- and we will prevail. (Applause.)

State of the Union Address by President George W. Bush


48 posted on 09/03/2003 2:01:44 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Bump!

Fox and Friends just interviewed the author. No meeting w/ Woolsey, Nobel Prize aspirations and the flatulent Sandy Berger and Maddy Albright.

Arafat did his job mentally masturbating our Commander and Chief while the Saudi-Bin Laden weaponry was allowed to position itself.

Our First Psychopathic President.

49 posted on 09/03/2003 4:57:16 AM PDT by Helms ("I Want My MTV" (More Televised Vulgarity))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Helms
losing it:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror Q ERTY6bump


direct link to flash movie



eyes wide shut
(she knew… she raped, too)
the movie
(requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

50 posted on 09/03/2003 5:58:17 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Though the psychopath is likely to give an early impression of being a thoroughly reliable person, it will soon be found that on many occasions he shows no sense of responsibility whatsoever. No matter how binding the obligation, how urgent the circumstances, or how important the matter, this holds true. Furthermore, the question of whether or not he is to be confronted with his failure or his disloyalty and called to account for it appears to have little effect on his attitude.

If such failures occurred uniformly and immediately, others would soon learn not to rely upon psychopaths or to be surprised at their conduct. It is, however, characteristic for them during some periods to show up regularly at work, to meet their financial obligations, to ignore an opportunity to steal. They may apply their excellent abilities in business or in study for a week, for months, or even for a year or more and thereby gain potential security, win a scholarship, be acclaimed top salesman or elected president of a social club or perhaps of a school honor society. Not all checks given by psychopaths bounce; not all promises are uniformly ignored. They do not necessarily land in jail every day (or every month) or seek to cheat someone else during every transaction. If so, it would be much simpler to deal with them. This transiently (but often convincingly) demonstrated ability to succeed in business and in all objective affairs makes failures more disturbing to those about them.

Furthermore, it cannot be predicted how long effective and socially acceptable conduct will prevail or precisely when (or in what manner) dishonest, outlandish, or disastrously irresponsible acts or failures to act will occur. These seem to have little or no relation to objective stress, to cyclic periods, or to major alterations of mood or outlook. What is at stake for the patient, for his family, or for anybody else is not a regularly determining factor. At the crest of success in his work he may forge a small check, indulge in petty thievery, or simply not come to the office. After a period of gracious and apparently happy relations with his family he may pick a quarrel with his wife, cuff her up a bit, drive her from the house, and then throw a glass of iced tea in the face of his 3-year-old son. For the initiation of such outbursts he does not, it seems, need any great anger. Moderate vexation usually suffices.

The psychopath's unreliability and his disregard for obligations and for consequences are manifested in both trivial and serious matters, are masked by demonstrations of conforming behavior, and cannot be accounted for by ordinary motives or incentives. Although it can be confidently predicted that his failures and disloyalties will continue, it is impossible to time them and to take satisfactory precautions against their effect. Here, it might be said, is not even a consistency in inconsistency but an inconsistency in inconsistency.

The psychopath shows a remarkable disregard for truth and is to be trusted no more in his accounts of the past than in his promises for the future or his statement of present intentions. He gives the impression that he is incapable of ever attaining realistic comprehension of an attitude in other people which causes them to value truth and cherish truthfulness in themselves

……. http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/cleckley-mos.htm

51 posted on 09/03/2003 6:22:24 AM PDT by Helms ("I Want My MTV" (More Televised Vulgarity))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
bttt
52 posted on 09/03/2003 11:34:22 PM PDT by nutmeg (Is the DemocRATic party extinct yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BARBRA
On a clear day can you see....?
53 posted on 09/03/2003 11:55:01 PM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Why is this a must read for Democrats? They are either 1) too stupid to understand it's implications or, 2) don't even care.

The proof is the BS posted by GOordance.
54 posted on 09/04/2003 12:01:14 AM PDT by Fledermaus (Democrats have stunted brain development!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Check out the Posner book released yesterday. Must read.
55 posted on 09/04/2003 5:07:09 AM PDT by sauropod ("How do you know Sheila Jackson Lee's a queen?" "Because she doesn't sit with the little people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Gerald Posner said yesterday (to O'Reilly, as I recall) that he voted for clinton TWICE but would not have done so, knowing what he knows today.

He said that when he was researching his new book, he was nauseated -- literally -- by clinton's utter failure to protect America from the growing global threat of terrorism.

Moreover, he added that he was further sickened by the attempt of the clintons and their minions to rewrite the clinton legacy of utter failure. (It was the terrorism, stupid.)


As an American Muslim and a political supporter of Clinton, I feel now, as I argued with Clinton and Berger then, that their counter-terrorism policies fueled the rise of Bin Laden from an ordinary man to a Hydra-like monster.

... Clinton's failure to grasp the opportunity to unravel increasingly organized extremists, coupled with Berger's assessments of their potential to directly threaten the U.S., represents one of the most serious foreign policy failures in American history

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize

The clintons' failures unleashed global terror.
Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?




eyes wide shut
(she knew… she raped, too)
the movie
(requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

56 posted on 09/04/2003 10:06:06 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Saw O'Reilly last night and also Fox and Friends this morning where Posner was on.

Buying the book this weekend.

Best, 'Pod

57 posted on 09/04/2003 10:08:00 AM PDT by sauropod ("How do you know Sheila Jackson Lee's a queen?" "Because she doesn't sit with the little people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: All
bttt
58 posted on 09/04/2003 3:21:46 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod; All
Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism

59 posted on 09/05/2003 5:49:09 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: BARBRA; All
hillary talks:ON TERROR
(reinstalling the clintons in the White House has one advantage over suicide)


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://demmemogate.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com

60 posted on 01/21/2004 7:49:39 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson