1 posted on
09/02/2003 12:35:20 PM PDT by
jern
To: jern
Yeah!!! Let's throw a get out of jail free party!!!
2 posted on
09/02/2003 12:37:00 PM PDT by
montag813
To: jern
I think their cases were commuted to life in prison. I have no problem with that, as long as they stay in prison until they die. That rarely happens.
3 posted on
09/02/2003 12:38:32 PM PDT by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: jern
This is ridiculous!
To: jern
God bless the Feds...they are so dear.
6 posted on
09/02/2003 12:42:23 PM PDT by
wardaddy
("when shrimps learn to whistle")
To: jern
Nothing but Judicial activism. These liberal judges in Calif just don't want the death penalty. Screw the presiding judges and juries in these cases. Screw the American people that overwelmingly want the death sentance. Screw the victims of these peoples crimes.
Getting to where we are going to need another revolution to rid ourselves of these maggots in govt.
To: jern
The gist of the ruling, which commuted the sentences to life without parole btw, was that these men had been sentenced to die by a judge, instead of by the jury.
From what I gather, the juries were not deciding punishment phase, and the court said that this violates the "jury of peers" thing.
I think it's an interesting legal issue actually. Only if the defendents prior to the fact demanded that the jury sentence them not a judge. I think a judge can properly do so, but there can be a legal argument that you should be allowed to let your peers determine your sentence.
To: jern
the 9th circuit..............figures
To: jern
AP reports that they were overturned because they were sentenced by a judge and not a jury.
21 posted on
09/02/2003 1:04:51 PM PDT by
yonif
("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
To: jern
We have a right to a jury trial.
27 posted on
09/02/2003 1:31:10 PM PDT by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: jern
It's the 9th Circuit. It will be overturned...
31 posted on
09/02/2003 1:50:39 PM PDT by
telebob
To: jern
If this doesn't get reversed, these killers have the rest of their 'natural' lives to get pardoned by another corrupt POTUS.
33 posted on
09/02/2003 2:10:22 PM PDT by
Ed_in_NJ
To: jern
Too bad we can't overturn judicial appointments and confirmations just as easy!
To: jern
Liberal, Socialist, Democrat: One and the same. Save a whale, commute a convicted murderer, free a murderer, free a sex offender, worship Stalin, kill an unborn baby.
Yup. All fits their definition.
36 posted on
09/02/2003 2:17:13 PM PDT by
RetiredArmy
(We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American Way! Toby Keith)
To: jern
More Judicial abuses from the 9th Circus Court of Appeals, the most over-turned court in America.
To: jern
41 posted on
09/02/2003 2:54:46 PM PDT by
Catspaw
To: jern
"In
Ring v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that a jury, rather than a judge, must make a finding of "aggravating factors" where those factors underlie a judge's choice to impose the death penalty rather than a lesser punishment."
48 posted on
09/02/2003 5:51:17 PM PDT by
mdittmar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson