Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/02/2003 12:35:20 PM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jern
Yeah!!! Let's throw a get out of jail free party!!!
2 posted on 09/02/2003 12:37:00 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
I think their cases were commuted to life in prison. I have no problem with that, as long as they stay in prison until they die. That rarely happens.
3 posted on 09/02/2003 12:38:32 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
This is ridiculous!
5 posted on 09/02/2003 12:41:36 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
God bless the Feds...they are so dear.
6 posted on 09/02/2003 12:42:23 PM PDT by wardaddy ("when shrimps learn to whistle")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
Nothing but Judicial activism. These liberal judges in Calif just don't want the death penalty. Screw the presiding judges and juries in these cases. Screw the American people that overwelmingly want the death sentance. Screw the victims of these peoples crimes.
Getting to where we are going to need another revolution to rid ourselves of these maggots in govt.

7 posted on 09/02/2003 12:43:48 PM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
The gist of the ruling, which commuted the sentences to life without parole btw, was that these men had been sentenced to die by a judge, instead of by the jury.

From what I gather, the juries were not deciding punishment phase, and the court said that this violates the "jury of peers" thing.

I think it's an interesting legal issue actually. Only if the defendents prior to the fact demanded that the jury sentence them not a judge. I think a judge can properly do so, but there can be a legal argument that you should be allowed to let your peers determine your sentence.

13 posted on 09/02/2003 12:47:47 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
the 9th circuit..............figures
20 posted on 09/02/2003 1:02:38 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
AP reports that they were overturned because they were sentenced by a judge and not a jury.
21 posted on 09/02/2003 1:04:51 PM PDT by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
We have a right to a jury trial.
27 posted on 09/02/2003 1:31:10 PM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
It's the 9th Circuit. It will be overturned...
31 posted on 09/02/2003 1:50:39 PM PDT by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
If this doesn't get reversed, these killers have the rest of their 'natural' lives to get pardoned by another corrupt POTUS.
33 posted on 09/02/2003 2:10:22 PM PDT by Ed_in_NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
Too bad we can't overturn judicial appointments and confirmations just as easy!

35 posted on 09/02/2003 2:13:14 PM PDT by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
Liberal, Socialist, Democrat: One and the same. Save a whale, commute a convicted murderer, free a murderer, free a sex offender, worship Stalin, kill an unborn baby.

Yup. All fits their definition.

36 posted on 09/02/2003 2:17:13 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American Way! Toby Keith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
More Judicial abuses from the 9th Circus Court of Appeals, the most over-turned court in America.
37 posted on 09/02/2003 2:17:53 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
I haven't slogged through all 90 pages of Summerlin v. Stewart, but the link to the case at the 9th circuit is below:

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/C9D33A3EF8BC665C88256D95005BFD72/$file/9899002.pdf?openelement
41 posted on 09/02/2003 2:54:46 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
"In Ring v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that a jury, rather than a judge, must make a finding of "aggravating factors" where those factors underlie a judge's choice to impose the death penalty rather than a lesser punishment."
48 posted on 09/02/2003 5:51:17 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson