Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/02/2003 11:36:23 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: presidio9
Paragraph please
2 posted on 09/02/2003 11:39:15 AM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER (Citizen Carry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Unlike your lack of paragraphs, Clinton's non action against Bin Laden was not a failure or an accident.

It was intentional.
6 posted on 09/02/2003 11:46:02 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud, hatch out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
read later
12 posted on 09/02/2003 12:02:07 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Some of the principals were concerned that bin Laden might somehow survive the cruise-missile attack and appear in another triumphant press conference.

Like I have said previously, it is going to take years and years of four-part articles to show the nation that Billy Jeff Blythe cared more about what other countries thought of him,rather than removing scum from the earth. Let me also state the Definition of a Liberal/Leftist/Weakling such as Bill Clinton,as it truly fits him: "Being a Liberal is easy because wanting to appear compassionate and likeable is easier than defending moral absolutes and taking a stand."Yes indeed, that defines him to a tee.

22 posted on 09/02/2003 12:21:02 PM PDT by Pagey (Hillary Rotten is a Smug, Holier - Than - Thou Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz; Joy Angela
FYI "Part one of an exclusive four-part series of excerpts" I knew "Some Journalist" had to eventually bring these facts to the fore.
28 posted on 09/02/2003 12:40:11 PM PDT by Pagey (Hillary Rotten is a Smug, Holier - Than - Thou Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Agggh. No paragraphs!!

Try this: < P>

Anyway, Clinton was interested in other things.

40 posted on 09/02/2003 1:56:25 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
The "Justice [Department] also noted, as always, that any use of force had to be consistent with international law, i.e. not retaliation but self protection from future attack,"

Accept of course militant religious groups and cuban refugees. International laws are superior to national laws.

What a despicable group!

41 posted on 09/02/2003 2:05:02 PM PDT by slimer (i'm mad as hell and i'm not going to take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
"An American warship had been attacked without warning in a "friendly" harbor..."

I thought Yemen was considered one of the most dangerous of the Arab countries.
43 posted on 09/02/2003 5:53:33 PM PDT by Maria S ("..I think the Americans are serious. Bush is not like Clinton. I think this is the end" Uday H.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson