Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proposed Base Closure 2005
2 Sept 03 | Email

Posted on 09/02/2003 9:21:06 AM PDT by SLB

For Your Info. The Army bases currently proposed for closure or realignment in 2005 include: Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania; Detroit Arsenal, Michigan; Fort Belvoir, Virginia; Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico; Fort McPherson/Gillem, Georgia; Fort Monmouth, New Jersey; Fort Monroe, Virginia; Fort Polk, Louisiana (to realign); Fort Richardson, Alaska; Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Fort Shafter, Hawaii; Lima Army Tank Plant, Ohio; Natick Soldier Center, Massachusetts; Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey; Redstone Arsenal, Alabama; Rock Island Arsenal, Illinois; Sierra Army Depot, California; and Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona.

Air Force base closures and realignments include: Altus AFB, Oklahoma; Beale AFB, California; Brooks AFB, Texas; Cannon AFB, New Mexico; Columbus AFB, Mississippi; Ellsworth AFB, South Dakota; Goodfellow AFB, Texas; Grand Forks AFB, North Dakota; Hanscom AFB, Massachusetts; Kirtland AFB, New Mexico; Los Angeles AFB, California; McConnell AFB, Kansas; Nellis AFB, Nevada (to realign); Seymour Johnson AFB, North Carolina (to realign); Shaw AFB, South Carolina; and Vance AFB, Oklahoma.

The Air Force will lose 2,260 military and 2,839 civilian manpower positions, and 1,055 reserve drill authorizations next year, according to the 2004 force-structure announcement released July 23.

Many bases, both active duty and reserve component, are affected by the realignment. In many cases, units will gain aircraft and missions, while others will pare down.

Besides manpower reductions, the realignment formally announces the retirement of the C-9A Nightingale and KC-135E Stratotanker aircraft. According to Air Force officials, the 20 C-9s are being retired because of reduced-patient movement, range limitations and increasing maintenance and upgrade costs. The aeromedical-evacuation mission will become a requirements-based system using all passenger-capable aircraft.

The service will retire 44 of the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Command's 43-year-old KC-135Es next year, replacing them with 24 KC-135Rs from the active-duty fleet. By the end of fiscal 2006, the Air Force will have retired 68 of the KC-135Es.

Naval base closures and realignments include: Ingleside Naval Station, Texas; Naval Postgraduate School, California; Naval Air Station Meridian, Mississippi; Naval Air Engineering Station Lakehurst, New Jersey; Naval Recreation Station Solomons Island, Maryland; Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane, Indiana; Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division, Virginia; Navy Supply Corps School, Georgia; New Orleans Naval Support Activity, Louisiana; Pascagoula Naval Station, Mississippi; Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, New Hampshire; and Saratoga Springs Naval Support Unit, New York.

Marine base closures and realignments include: Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany, Georgia; Marine Corps Logistics Base Barstow, California (realignment); Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, California; Marine Corps Mountain Warfare School, California; Marine Reserve Support Unit, Kansas City; and Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego, California (realign or close).


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: baseclosure; dahlgren; fortbelvoir; fortmonroe; militarybases
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last
To: donozark
EVERY medic in the US Army trains there... and that's where I'll be in January. I seriously doubt they will be closing this base, as I just saw that the Army division formerly based in Puerto Rico will now call Sam Houston home, as well. Maybe that's what is meant by "realignment".

And I hope this isn't true, because Belvoir is my first choice for assignment when I finish AIT next summer.
61 posted on 09/02/2003 10:53:10 AM PDT by D. Brian Carter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: D. Brian Carter
I jsut read Ft. Belvorus web page. IG, management school,etc. Guess it still remains open for time being.

I caught that about the unit from PR going to Ft. Sam. Was that a Div. or Brigade?

Oh, and good luck with your plans!

62 posted on 09/02/2003 10:58:53 AM PDT by donozark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: big ern
There have been attempt to close Rock Island every couple of years for a decade now. I hope they don't do it.

What happens to the assets on these properties when they close?
63 posted on 09/02/2003 11:03:18 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: donozark
Me thinks the inclusion of Ft. Sam is in error. Medics/docs/nurses train there. Sen. Kay Hutchinson just announced a multi-million dollar upgrade to hospital facilities, base,etc.

The reason for the upgrade is the acquisition of a new mission, as the HQ U.S. Army South (USARSO), which moved from Puerto Rico.

64 posted on 09/02/2003 11:12:09 AM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SLB
Interesting to see MCAS Miramar on the list. When I moved to Mira Mesa in 1983, the base was NAS Miramar and home to the Top Gun school. I was present on the tarmac in 1969 when the first F-14 landed with the Secretary of the Navy in the RIO seat. I was a Boy Scout assigned to pass out programs at the first Miramar Air Show that year.

The locals have been bitching about the noisy helocopters since the Marines reclaimed the base in 2000. The 12000 foot runways have been eyed by the politicians as a replacement for the crappy airport in downtown San Diego. My old house in Mira Mesa was a mile north of the runway. If it becomes the regional airport, the traffic and noise will go way beyond the current unbearable levels. My new house is 912 miles north of the runway, so I won't notice :-)

I wonder of my son's assignment to the reserve unit at the east end of the airfield will be impacted by the closing. If so, he would probably have to drive to Pendleton for his reserve weekends.

65 posted on 09/02/2003 11:13:24 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB
I would hope that this isn't a valid list. Nellis and Kirtland both have "one of a kind" facilities and airspace that would make them EXTREMELY expensive or impossible to duplicate.

Several of the other AF bases are used for the undergraduate pilot training programs. These programs were merged during the last BRAC and it would be very difficult to combine them with another base's flying mission. There already having problems with available airspace during the daylight hours. This problem would be pretty difficult to manage.

66 posted on 09/02/2003 11:13:47 AM PDT by mbynack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB
"Goodfellow AFB"

Good riddance to it, and bad cess to the city of San Angelo, where the city hates the military folks on the base, but loves the money. Tough nuts, San Angelo.
67 posted on 09/02/2003 11:14:07 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
With fewer bases we'll spend less money and need fewer troops for force-protection. That will leave the military with more money and troops for actual missions overseas.

The government never realized a lot of the savings from the first round of closures. Some of the bases that they expected to become regional airports are still vacant - George AFB in California and England AFB in LA are two that I can think of.

The closures left the military with critical shortages in the medical fields.

Placing all of a single mission at one base is poor stategy. Not only do you have to worry about man-made problems like an attack, you have to consider what would happen if the only logistics facility had a tornado, flood, or hurricane that shut it down.

Now that we're shutting down a lot of our overseas bases the military needs bases in the US to put the people. Cutting troop strengths is no longer a good option because the military mission continues to grow. The cutbacks in the late 80's and early 90's have left the military with too few people. Some stateside units spend at least six months a year overseas. They rotate to Bosnia for three months and then come home just long enough to fix the broken equipment before going to Saudi to provide air cover.

68 posted on 09/02/2003 11:23:24 AM PDT by mbynack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: donozark
Actually, Sam Houston is already the home of the 5th US Army, in addition to the command and training structures of other Army areas, mostly concerning medical personnel. The move from Puerto Rico is being made by the US Army South Command, adding 500+ personnel to the 100,000+ soldiers, family members and civilians housed at the base.
69 posted on 09/02/2003 11:31:49 AM PDT by D. Brian Carter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: SLB
It seems the Defense Department is the only government agency closing things down and cutting back on people, equipment and programs. It's also one of the few that actually does anything constructive for America.

Maybe HHS, Education, State, Commerce and all the rest of the parasites ought to follow suit? Who knows, if they did, we might someday get our budget back in the black and these crushing taxes and useless programs off our necks!

70 posted on 09/02/2003 11:31:52 AM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khurkris
KC-135's are history. Too much time on their airframes.

Not hardly, the airframes are good to at least 2040. Howver the engines on the -Es are about shot. -R's F-108 engines are still plenty good to go. Some or all -Es could be converted to Rs and even with the addition of some 767 tankers, which is still being fought by the DemoRats and some RINOs, we'd still be short of tankers. Lack of tankers slows deployments, and may impact in theater operations as well, although the actual ops get priority of course, supplying those needs may really impact things elsewhere.

71 posted on 09/02/2003 11:34:04 AM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
the E-6 from the Navy and the AWACS share the same platform.

While they are the same Airframe, they have different engines. The AWACS guys *wish* they had the engines that the E-6 has. Tinker is full to the gills, both the AWACS and the E-6s are new since I was stationed there (many, many moons ago) as you point out, they are tearing down commerical buildings and houses on the other side of I-40 from the base, (have torn down would be a better way to say it) to provide expanded space for the base. Yet someone wants to move the ANG C-130s from Will Rodgers to Tinker, I wonder where he thinks they'd put them, and their required facilities? A drive around Tinker at this time last year revealed very little space, especially space with access to the airfield.

72 posted on 09/02/2003 11:41:53 AM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Beats relying on 45-year old planes that are modified 707s.

Actually they (-135s) are not modified 707s. They derive from the same Boeing prototype as the 707, but they have smaller diameter fuselodges and many other differences. Not nearly as much commonality as you might think. Boeing model number for the -135 seres was 717.

73 posted on 09/02/2003 11:44:37 AM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: viligantcitizen
Possible I suppose, but not sure it would be very logical. Gillem perhaps, but too much money has recently been poured into MacPherson, including the huge new Army Reserve HQ, as well as FORSCOM HQ and ARCENT HQ. Lots of HQ for a small inexpensive post.

Not that that has necessarily stopped us from closing a base in the past, just...

And I agree, closing bases and posts is not a bad thing, as long as they close the correct ones. (I know...which are the correct ones?)
74 posted on 09/02/2003 11:49:28 AM PDT by Proud Legions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SLB
This story was poo-poo-ed on local news last night here at the home of Columbus AFB MS. DOD officials flatly denied that the list was authentic.

I've no doubt that the list is probably a starting place as Columbus has been on the first list for the last several rounds.

However, Mississippi still has two very powerful Republican senators who have staked their political careers on keeping NAS Meridian and Columbus AFB open. I don't think either is ready for retirement yet and the closure of either or both of these bases would seal their fates.
75 posted on 09/02/2003 11:55:45 AM PDT by NerdDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbynack
I would hope that this isn't a valid list. Nellis and Kirtland both have "one of a kind" facilities...

Isn't Nellis aka Groomlake aka Area-51 fame? They are giving up that great, huge dry lake bed landing area? That does seem odd. Says "realigned" so perhaps just combining with what's ever there now.
76 posted on 09/02/2003 12:06:40 PM PDT by KillTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
I think inclusion of Miramar on the list is a political bone thrown to the politicians in San Diego. The Marines have nowhere else to go; Pendleton is not an option. My husband had the misfortune of working at Community Plans and Liaison at Miramar before he retired and he had to deal with this very issue constantly. The locals whine about the helicopters, but have they thought about the racket a commercial airport would make?
77 posted on 09/02/2003 12:37:23 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Tag Line Expired: Resubmit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
What do you know about the KC-135?

Rode a KC-135E down to the PI once.

Engines aren't supposed to wobble on their pylons, are they? :o)

78 posted on 09/02/2003 1:10:56 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SLB
Hell, why don't they go ahead and close Quantico? /eyeroll.
79 posted on 09/02/2003 1:14:13 PM PDT by sauropod ("How do you know he's a king?" "Because he doesn't have sh*t all over him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Goes along with them closing Detroit Arsenal.

Current SECDEF's orientation should have been a warning.

80 posted on 09/02/2003 1:15:16 PM PDT by sauropod ("How do you know he's a king?" "Because he doesn't have sh*t all over him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson