Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ARNOLD'S MISTRESS: HIS SHOCKING 7-YEAR AFFAIR [girl was 16]
National Enquirer ^ | 4-01 | National Enquirer

Posted on 08/30/2003 11:51:05 PM PDT by ambrose

ARNOLD'S MISTRESS

HIS SHOCKING 7-YEAR AFFAIR

For seven years, Arnold Schwarzenegger hid a mistress from his loving wife Maria Shriver -- and hours after learning The ENQUIRER discovered his sordid secret, "The Terminator" terminated his run for governor of California.

The brazen actor began his affair with former child actress Gigi Goyette when she was only 16 -- and even made love to her in the very same hotel where he was staying with "Dateline" star Maria.

A bombshell ENQUIRER investigation -- featured in our issue that hits the stands Friday -- has exposed the whole shocking story, including how the father of four hid the trysts from his family.

Several months ago the muscleman-turned-actor emerged as a leading Republican contender for governor of California -- but earlier this week, after we called his representative for comment, the star made a surprise announcement that he won't enter politics until his youngsters, ages 3 to 11, are older.

Published on: April 26, 2001


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ambroseisascumbag; ambrosestfu; ambrosesucks; clintonlegacy; schwarzenbubba; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 401-417 next last
To: ambrose
I hope Arnold was in Hawaii or Utah at the time she was 16! (the only two places it is legal)..or Europe
261 posted on 08/31/2003 6:56:29 AM PDT by prarie earth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
"Arnold Schwarzenegger's talking to contractors about building a BUNKER underneath the driveway of his Pacific Palisades estate to protect him and his family from biological or nuclear attack!"

It's certainly big enough, it's more like a concrete courtyard with garages on one side and the home on the other.
262 posted on 08/31/2003 7:00:51 AM PDT by dalereed (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
50 year old man + 16 year old girl = statutory rape in most American states, including Cali.

No. it's not statutory rape in 27 of the 50 states. Or in England where it suposedly happened.

263 posted on 08/31/2003 7:05:30 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy ("Pillage, THEN Burn")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy; Travis McGee
See post #247. The relationship happened in England, where age of consent is 16. It happened about 28 years ago, when Arnold was in his 20's. It happened, and ended, LONG before Arnold got married.
264 posted on 08/31/2003 7:19:56 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer === needs a job at the moment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
As many of us has said since Arnold declared, he's got to have so many stories like this one that he is unelectable. It is only a matter of time until "THE" story comes out that finally takes Arnold out. This one may be it. We just need to make sure the real Republican candidate isn't forced out of the race before Arnold has to quit over this or some other, in a long stream of scandals.
265 posted on 08/31/2003 7:25:28 AM PDT by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americafirst
"When are they going to start nailing you to a cross?"

That is perhaps the single nastiest thing I have seen posted in my 4 years here.

I apologize, upon reflection it sounds a lot meaner than I intended. I meant it in the same manner as, "He who is without sin cast the first stone."
266 posted on 08/31/2003 7:34:16 AM PDT by BushCountry (To the last, I will grapple with Democrats. For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at Liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor; Travis McGee
It happened about 28 years ago, when Arnold was in his 20's.

I know that now.

I believed Travis's version. Won't do that again.

267 posted on 08/31/2003 7:39:59 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy ("Pillage, THEN Burn")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor; Jim Robinson
Thanks for the research and posting of the FACTS.

When the NE is the source I always look at the presentation with a weary eye.

If nothing else you have done a service to Free Republic. Perhaps the Moderators should be as vigilant. Perhaps Ambrose will learn something here, but I doubt it.

268 posted on 08/31/2003 8:00:54 AM PDT by ImpBill ("You are either with US or against US!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
As usual. Another ambrose lie with a twist of distortion. You really are doing McClintock a disservice.
269 posted on 08/31/2003 8:02:21 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
McClintock's stand on abortion, the homosexual agenda and gun control alone will doom him in thier eyes. All of a sudden a clear contrast emerges. Cruz Bustamante the democart loyalist or Tom McClintock the rabid Christian Conservative, who will the Schwarzenegger leaning democrats vote for folks? McClintock? What we are seeing is the laying of the groundwork for one of the lowest voter turnouts in this state's history. If Schwarzenegger is successfully destroyed politically, many people are going to stay home on election day, demoralized to the point of dropping out.

If the country club RINO republicans keep insulting and cutting down their base AKA RABID Christian Conservatives, they will get their wish one day and drive all of us out of their exclusive little club so they can be free to fawn over the latest Hollywood sleaze artist / candidate that looks, talks and acts just like Bill Clinton.

Of course when the country-club RINO's get their wish, they will relegate themselves into PERMANANT minor-party status!

After all, why vote for a fake demoRat when you can vote for the real thing?

RINO's worship at the same rotten alter as democrats do.

"Winning" is the name of your small g, god. You would sacrifice the future of your children to appease him!

270 posted on 08/31/2003 8:26:57 AM PDT by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry
Thanks a lot - sorry about my reply too . . . We're all on the same team here and seriously, I am conflicted as to what the cutoff is for bad behavior. I do agree that there should be - HAS to be - some statute of limitations.
271 posted on 08/31/2003 9:22:27 AM PDT by americafirst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
Fox news was just talking about DC schools. 90% of fourth graders can't read at basic levels. 95% of them can't do math at basic levels.

I would have to concur, you are in occupied territory.
272 posted on 08/31/2003 9:42:44 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Posting easily debunked National Inquirer stories about Arnold now... don't you realize how badly this type of no-ethical-limitations smear campaign by his supporters reflects on McClintock? Would you cut it out, PLEASE???
273 posted on 08/31/2003 9:43:39 AM PDT by Tamzee ("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brigette
One more pic is visible at:

http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&newwindow=1&safe=off&q=gigi+jeffers&btnG=Google+Search
274 posted on 08/31/2003 9:46:09 AM PDT by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Probably will gain a few votes in California.
275 posted on 08/31/2003 10:08:47 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Woodman
You follow your Google search and it returns 5 hits

That's only to sites referring to the incident as "statutory rape".

Try: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&q=schwarzenegger+gigi+goyette

276 posted on 08/31/2003 10:17:16 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man
To: DoughtyOne

I have personally interviewed a union employee that has never voted for a repubican in his life.  He is convinced Davis and Bustamante are undesirable.  He is intending to vote for Schwarzenegger.  What in anyone's (on this forum) wildest dreams do they think this union employee will do if Schwarzenegger is not a viable candidate?  Do they think the union folks, or other democrats who have decided to vote for Schwarzenegger are going to all of a sudden opt for McClintock?  Do they think the Schwarzenegger influenced new registrant's will?

McClintock's stand on abortion, the homosexual agenda and gun control alone will doom him in thier eyes. All of a sudden a clear contrast emerges. Cruz Bustamante the democart loyalist or Tom McClintock the rabid Christian Conservative, who will the Schwarzenegger leaning democrats vote for folks? McClintock? What we are seeing is the laying of the groundwork for one of the lowest voter turnouts in this state's history. If Schwarzenegger is successfully destroyed politically, many people are going to stay home on election day, demoralized to the point of dropping out.

If the country club RINO republicans keep insulting and cutting down their base AKA RABID Christian Conservatives, they will get their wish one day and drive all of us out of their exclusive little club so they can be free to fawn over the latest Hollywood sleaze artist / candidate that looks, talks and acts just like Bill Clinton.

If you guys would quit looking for fights and read the comments I provide, you'd at least cut down on the instances where you come off looking unable to comprehend simple logic.

You conveniently left out the paragraph just prior to the one you repeated.  That paragraph, the red one above, sets up a premise which I continue to address in the paragaph you posted.

It should be clear to anyone reading this, that the term "rabid Christian Conservatives", is how Bustamante will frame McClintock in public.  It's how union leftists are going to view McClintock.  You and I think McClintock is just right on the political spectrum, but it isn't your and my perceptions that we're talking about here is it?  It is the democrat voter and where they will roam if Schwarzenegger is made unviable, that I was addressing here.  Therefore their perceptions trumped.

Of course when the country-club RINO's get their wish, they will relegate themselves into PERMANANT minor-party status!

I've seen the Republican leadership in the state try to push Riordan off on us, so I guess there may be a RINO element, but I do not see a vast wing of the republican party as desiring the policies of Schwarzenegger over McClintock.  So this RINO comment addresses very few people.  There is no representation of Schwarzenegger firsters here on this forum.  You will see many people who will suggest that it is better to vote for Schwarzenegger rather than see Bustamante elected.

After all, why vote for a fake demoRat when you can vote for the real thing?

Well, despite our desire, McClintock may not be a viable candidate on October 7th.  That is why.

RINO's worship at the same rotten alter as democrats do.

Well I don't see any evidence that anyone here prefers Schwarzenegger over McClintock, so these comments are just inflamatory nonsense.

"Winning" is the name of your small g, god. You would sacrifice the future of your children to appease him!

Since my children are not decendants of Mexican ancestors, they will have no future in a Bustamante California.  The motto "For the Race everything, for others nothing" addresses this issue head on.  If McClintock does not rise in the polls, some of us will see no choice but to vote for Schwarzenegger if he's still around.

Schwarzenegger may be a closet democrat, but he doesn't see an "X" on my children's foreheads.

270 posted on 08/31/2003 8:26 AM PDT by Walkin Man

277 posted on 08/31/2003 10:21:38 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Do you also believe that Ronald Reagan was a rapist? Someone came out and "acknowledged" that in some sort an expose like this after "rumors" were started.
278 posted on 08/31/2003 10:32:06 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat (Help us elect Republicans in Kentucky! Click on my name for links to all the 2003 candidates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Arnold you cad.
279 posted on 08/31/2003 10:32:55 AM PDT by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
"If McClintock does not rise in the polls, some of us will see no choice but to vote for Schwarzenegger if he's still around."

I for one won't be joining you!

Moderate dumocrats won't vote for a liberal democrat if they have a choice of a conservative Republican but they will consistantly vote for the liberal democrat against a moderate Republican, I proved it in my run against Alatore in a mostly mexican welfare district and got more votes than anyone did before or since in the district.

As far as the union vote, what the leaders endorse and promote doesn't mean anything, at least half of their membership are only members in order to hold their jobs and re either moderate or conservative. The percentage is much higher in the public sector unions but those people are totally lost forever anyway.
280 posted on 08/31/2003 10:36:28 AM PDT by dalereed (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 401-417 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson