Skip to comments.
"The Worst Liberal Senator"
American Conservative Union
| American Conservative Union
Posted on 08/28/2003 8:26:51 PM PDT by webber
"The Worst Liberal Senator"
There's a sitting U.S. Senator who has a 42 percent lifetime rating from the American Conservative Union, which is exactly HALF the average for Republican senators.
This liberal Senator votes the WRONG way on everything from taxes, spending, and national security, to cloning, hate crimes, and labor law.
He's a supporter of abortion-on-demand no matter the circumstances, he advocates racial preferences, he's an opponent of much-needed tort reform, he's a firm friend of the United Nations' International Criminal Court... you name the left-wing pet project, and he's in favor of it.
Citizens Against Government Waste has even listed him in its "Pig Book" as one of the Senate's biggest pork-barrel spenders.
Who is this bastion of old-line, tax-and-spend liberalism, who helped slash the Bush administration's tax cuts by $250 billion in 2001?
Is it Louisiana Democrat John Breaux? No, his ACU rating is HIGHER than the liberal Senator we have in mind.
Is it Nebraska Democrat Ben Nelson? No, his ACU rating is even HIGHER still.
In fact...
... The LIBERAL Senator we're talking about isn't even a Democrat at all -- He's a REPUBLICAN. His name is Arlen Specter (R-PA).
That's right -- a 42% ACU rating, a staunch supporter of every liberal cause under the sun, and even an opponent of many conservative judicial nominees in the past (he even voted AGAINST impeaching Clinton)... Republican Sen. Arlen Specter is NO friend to conservative Americans.
In fact, the latest issue of National Review, the leading conservative magazine, calls Sen. Specter "The Worst Republican Senator" and "one of the GOP's most liberal members." In the cover article by John J. Miller, the author explains why "Pennsylvania should get rid of Arlen Specter"; namely, that he is "the man who has done more to frustrate conservative goals over the years than perhaps any other member of his caucus." Want a few examples of Sen. Specter's blatant liberalism?
Take a look:
- Specter helped the Democrats to "bork" Judge Robert Bork;
- He was the first Republican to cross the aisle to vote for Clinton's "largest tax increase in history";
- He sponsored the "Freedom of Choice Act" which would have forced religious hospitals to perform abortions;
- He sponsored as many Democrats for federal judgeships as Republicans; He voted to drastically reduce President Bush's tax cut;
- And, he was the only GOP Senator to vote against President Bush's educational voucher initiative in the Washington, D.C. school district.
Add it all up, and you can see why the RightMarch.com Political Action Committee has chosen the GOP primary race in Pennsylvania as the target for its first official "RINO Hunt". (As you probably know, a "RINO" is a "Republican In Name Only" -- someone elected on the GOP ticket, but who consistently votes a liberal line instead of voting conservative. And Specter sure does qualify!)
This is no ordinary primary coming up next April. Unlike past primaries in Pennsylvania, this one pits a REAL, true-blue conservative -- Congressman Pat Toomey, who holds a 97 PERCENT rating from the ACU -- against the aging, liberal Specter. And there's good reason to think Toomey can pull it off:
- It's a closed primary -- only Republicans can vote, which usually benefits the conservative candidate;
- No matter what the issue is, when it comes to Specter's record, there's always something that will offend most Republicans;
- In past elections, fully one-third of the primary voters voted to replace Specter, even when the only choice was challengers who were either single-issue candidates or no-campaign, no-name challengers;
- Finally, Toomey already has a double-digit lead over Specter in his home district, even though Specter's been in office more than five times as long.
It won't be easy, though; Specter has already raised more than 9 million dollars for his campaign. It's going to be an uphill fight.
We plan to send HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of e-mails (we've already gotten an opt-in list of registered Republicans in Pennsylvania), run targeted ads on every website, and make it easy for tens of thousands of online activists to forward our Alerts to everyone in their contact list, to let Pennsylvania GOP voters know the TRUTH about Arlen Specter.
We also will reach them with full page newspaper ads in every newspaper across the state... with hard-hitting radio ads that detail Specter's record... with mailings and phone calls providing much-needed information that the mainstream media won't tell them.
Even more importantly, we're going to remind them of Sen. Specter's record when it comes to supporting -- or NOT supporting -- conservative issues: as National Review noted, "Specter votes like a Democrat until late in his term, when he remembers that he will need at least some conservatives on his side if he's going to win another six years."
And, at his age (if Specter wins a fifth term this election, he'll be 80 years old in 2010), if he knows he's going to retire and doesn't have to face any more election campaigns, conservatives may not even get the one or two years of fair treatment from him they've come to expect. He could be another Jim Jeffords... jumping ship when we need him the most.
Or even worse: should Specter somehow leave office in the midst of his term, Pennsylvania's DEMOCRAT Governor would get to appoint a DEMOCRAT to replace him!
We MUST NOT let this happen.
It's doesn't do us any good to have a Republican majority there, if so many of those Republicans consist of liberals like Arlen Specter.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2004; acu; arlenspecter; pattoomey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
08/28/2003 8:26:51 PM PDT
by
webber
To: webber
What a t*rd.
2
posted on
08/28/2003 8:29:07 PM PDT
by
Paul Atreides
(Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
To: webber
see Drudge
3
posted on
08/28/2003 8:30:50 PM PDT
by
formercalifornian
(Now, let's liberate South Dakota!)
To: webber
But he's a Republican, and that's all that's important to Freepers these days (look at all the Ahnold boosters here).
4
posted on
08/28/2003 8:33:31 PM PDT
by
ambrose
(If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention...)
To: webber
Wow. The ACU actually spent the time and money on this? They only said what everyone has known for a long time. It's not news.
To: webber
Arlen Specter = Anal Sphincter
He holds back a great deal you don't want to see. He passes nothing you care about. He lives in a place you never want to visit. When he speaks, its only hot air and makes no sense. He is the consumate politician.
To: webber
Retiring Specter would be one great victory. He's such a tool!
7
posted on
08/28/2003 8:35:09 PM PDT
by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
To: WorkingClassFilth
Arlen Specter = Anal Sphincter He holds back a great deal you don't want to see. He passes nothing you care about. He lives in a place you never want to visit. When he speaks, its only hot air and makes no sense. He is the consumate politician.I can't help but notice that this entire post is anal in nature. "He speaks hot air", "He passes nothing you care about". And I wouldn't want to visit the place where lives, (although some liberals have their head there).
Is there something Freudian you're not telling us?
8
posted on
08/28/2003 8:50:52 PM PDT
by
natewill
(Start the revolution NOW!)
To: natewill
Nope. It's all clear as a bell to me - Arlen is an *sshole. I guess it's on them thing-eys were ya see it or ya don't.
To: webber
The writer forgot to mention another point against Specter: He defended hippie-guru-murderer
Ira Einhorn.
Now I know criminals are entitled to a defense. But Specter actually seemed to be taken in by Einhorn.
To: ambrose
But our President (who has stayed FAR away from the 10 commandments issue) and Rick Santorum both support him! The REAL candidate, Pat Toomey is about as popular to the WH as Tom Tancredo, which tells me he is worth voting for, even if he now has no chance of winning.
To: webber
Someone ought to remember that Spector was one of Justice Thomas's biggest defenders. Thomas was only confirmed by 52 votes. It was that close.
12
posted on
08/28/2003 9:08:10 PM PDT
by
RichardW
To: RichardW
Yeah, I remember the former prosecutor rising to cross examine Anital Hill.
13
posted on
08/28/2003 9:20:19 PM PDT
by
merry10
To: webber
Specter is the author of the single bullet theory in the Kennedy assassination which has got to be the most ridiculous, asinine, stupidest piece of lies ever perpetrated on the American consciousness with the mainstream media in league with the devil. (I'm no Kennedy fan either.) However, to understand what occurred with one bullet and the fantastic unbelievable route the bullet takes yet to come out of this far-fetched traveled path in pristine condition defies the imagination. And this is what Specter developed and pushed down Americans throat and propelled Specter into his senatorial positon. Am I surprised at Spector? Nothing about that creep surprises me at all.
To: Captainpaintball
...which tells me he is worth voting for, even if he now has no chance of winning.Next Thread.
15
posted on
08/28/2003 9:33:57 PM PDT
by
Consort
The worst senator is Robert Byrd. This country will be a lot better off when his racist a$$ is gone.
16
posted on
08/28/2003 9:40:52 PM PDT
by
GOPyouth
(De Oppresso Liber! Heather Nauert is all that is woman!)
To: webber
42 ACU rating? What about his SLU rating?
SLU=Scottish Law Union
17
posted on
08/28/2003 9:49:16 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Master of the single entendre)
To: webber
When under Republican rules, Hatch rotates out as Chairman of Judiciary, Specter is in line to become chairman. You can then forget about conservative, pro-life judicial appointments.
To: webber
Is the magic bullet theory allowed to be presented under Scottish Law? Just curious.
To: webber
Gee. Knock me over with a feather. Golly..............................who knew?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson