AAPS: Political Pressure Prevents Women from Learning about Abortion Risks

AAPS: Political Pressure Prevents Women from Learning about Abortion Risks; Politics Trumps Science in Abortion, Breast Cancer Link

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contact: Kathryn Serkes, 202-333-3855 or kaserkes@att.net for the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons

WASHINGTON, Aug. 28 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Scientists, women's groups, and the media have consistently suppressed or ignored research that establishes a direct link between abortion and breast cancer for their own political purposes. Further, women considering abortion are not given true informed consent about the real risks of the procedure as a result of withholding this evidence.

Those are the conclusions of the new study published in the Summer 2003 Issue of the peer-reviewed Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (JP&S) titled "The Abortion-Breast Cancer Link: How Politics Trumped Science and Informed Consent." (Full text of article posted at http://www.jpands.org.)

The article discusses the epidemiologic evidence of an ABC link; the silence and denial of the National Cancer Institute, the American Cancer Society, the American Medical Association and women's groups; media bias; the bitter opposition of pro-abortion politicians; the implications for patient care; and medical malpractice issues. A companion article documents at least 49 studies that demonstrate a statistically significant increase in premature births or low birth weight with prior induced abortions.

Malec shows how several studies conducted as early as 1957 showing the link were suppressed or ignored, as were later post-Roe studies that showed significantly higher rates of breast cancer in the "Roe Generation." For example, Brind et al estimated that in 1996 an excess of 5,000 cases of breast cancer were attributable to abortion, and that the annual excess would increase by 500 cases each year. They predicted 25,000 excess cases in the year 2036.

Authors of studies actually denied their own findings when political heat was applied. One lead author of a record-linkage case study in 1989 worked with a group of American Cancer Society ACS) researchers who reviewed the research. By then 11 of 12 US studies indicated increased risk, but she still stated the research -- including her own -- was "inconsistent" and that she could not arrive at "definitive conclusions."

The scientific and medical community admits that the reasons for the suppression are political. The president of the American Society of Breast Surgeons said that she presented her concerns about getting information to the public about the abortion-breast cancer link, but the board felt it was "too political." The director of the Miami Breast Cancer Conference explained that there was no presentation on the program because it was "too political."

The author found that the web pages of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and leading American and Canadian cancer organizations contain false statements, misrepresentation, and omissions in their discussions. Yet when pressured by scientists to post studies that show a 2.4 fold increase in breast cancer risk, pro-choice activist cried foul, accusing them of using "pro-life scare tactics." Equally astounding is the fact that most of the 15 American studies were funded at least in part by the NCI, and 13 of them found increased risk.

For their efforts to inform women about the studies that the NCI forgot to mention, the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer was compared to the Taliban in a newspaper.

In conclusion, the author writes that in the end, it may be the trial lawyers, not the medical community, who force full disclosure through liability litigation against those who perform abortions without providing women with fully informed disclosure about the elevated risk.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons is a non-partisan, professional association of physicians in all specialties, dedicated since 1943 to protection of the patient-physician relationship.

They also don't tell them that your conscience might bother you for the rest of your life, that you may never conceive another child, that your mother and father will be one grandchild short...this is about a lot of relationships, not just about killing one baby which is one too much.

There are winners in this abortion issue.

They are known as the "Murder for money perverts". They see no connection or guilt in the ripping apart of innocent babies for money, afterall it's legal so I'm not doing anything against the law.

The courts have also said that it's legal for people of the same sex to marry, to allow a person to be starved to death, to remove all references to God from public buildings, and who knows what the next slimey, perverted ruling these judges for life who are answerable to no one will drag up from the lowest levels of the sewer.

The day when God tells his only son to bring his people home is fast approaching. It can't come to soon for me as I am amazed at how much man is comparing himself equal to or above the true God.

They also don't tell the women that sometimes the Doctor doesn't get all the fetus out during the procedure, and bits of bone, hair, and teeth get left inside the uterus. Later when an egg gets fertilized, it can be destroyed or damaged by the debris left behind by the prior abortion.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.