[montag813]

Plus if Dean is the nominee the Clintons would have one of their own as the VP and thus would still have a voice in things. It is so obvious that I cannot believe I did not think about it before.

Exactly. Everyone else is in denial. This is the plan. Wesley Clark is the Clinton's Frankenstein. They created him. They promoted him on an unprecedented scale. He did great evil for them in Waco and Serbia, remained loyal, and told no tales, like Harold Ickes, who we now see again as central to this effort. Clark's swift move up the ladder is evidence of reward for keeping secrets. He is a ruthless, psychologically unstable man with extreme delusions of grandeur and a disturbing ease with brutality (Waco, Serbian civilians). But the public is not generally aware of this and thus fits the bill as an ideal counterpoint to Hillary.

The bluster on this forum is naive. They will make a formidable pair.

[LS]

No, sir or madame, it is you who are naive. You fail to recognize that the ONLY reason there is ANY hope for any Dem to beat Bush is because there is some weakening on his right flank over CFR, the Aff Action statements, and the spending. These would fly out the window in a heartbeat if the Beast runs. I'm telling you, you have not seen negative turnout like you will see with that woman. I bet right now if you took a poll of Freepers who at this moment said they would not vote for Bush in 04, then told them the opponent was Hillary, 95%---all but the most radical Libertarians---would suddenly switch their votes.