Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul
Based on his own opinion in the Moore case, Myron Thompson would've ruled the same way on this case. Hudspeth ain't a better judge than Easterbrook, though, and if you think that based on this one article you need to do a little homework.

So basically it boils down to the judge, or, in effect, the rule of men, not law. Thanks for making my point for me.

86 posted on 08/28/2003 2:51:38 PM PDT by dirtboy (Press Alt-Ctrl-Del to reset this tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
That is a remarkable twisting of my words. What I said is exactly to the contrary. The only difference between the decision of Hudspeth and the decision of Thompson is that they were faced with two very different cases. From everything in the Thompson decision, if he was faced with the facts in the case before Hudspeth he would've made the same call.
91 posted on 08/28/2003 2:53:41 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson