That is a remarkable twisting of my words. What I said is exactly to the contrary. The only difference between the decision of Hudspeth and the decision of Thompson is that they were faced with two very different cases. From everything in the Thompson decision, if he was faced with the facts in the case before Hudspeth he would've made the same call.
That is a remarkable twisting of my words. What I said is exactly to the contrary. Yeah, right.
The only difference between the decision of Hudspeth and the decision of Thompson is that they were faced with two very different cases. From everything in the Thompson decision, if he was faced with the facts in the case before Hudspeth he would've made the same call.
Sure, we end up with one monument on state property allowed to stay in place and the other removed. Yeah, that's consistency, all right.