Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bjs1779
Based on his own opinion in the Moore case, Myron Thompson would've ruled the same way on this case.

Hudspeth ain't a better judge than Easterbrook, though, and if you think that based on this one article you need to do a little homework.

79 posted on 08/28/2003 2:45:43 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul
Based on his own opinion in the Moore case, Myron Thompson would've ruled the same way on this case. Hudspeth ain't a better judge than Easterbrook, though, and if you think that based on this one article you need to do a little homework.

So basically it boils down to the judge, or, in effect, the rule of men, not law. Thanks for making my point for me.

86 posted on 08/28/2003 2:51:38 PM PDT by dirtboy (Press Alt-Ctrl-Del to reset this tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: lugsoul
Hudspeth ain't a better judge than Easterbrook, though, and if you think that based on this one article you need to do a little homework.

An ARTICLE? This FEDERAL JUDGE sided that the Ten Commandments could stay on STATE PROPERTY in FULL VIEW OF THE PUBLIC in a COURT OF LAW, just as your buddy Easterbrook didn't. You are biased in one direction and I am biased in another. SCOUTS should of rejected the order to remove that monument in Alabama until they ruled on the conflicting Federal judges opinions. If it is right is Texas, it is right in Alabama. Or vise versa.

192 posted on 08/28/2003 6:10:39 PM PDT by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson