To: bjs1779
Based on his own opinion in the Moore case, Myron Thompson would've ruled the same way on this case.
Hudspeth ain't a better judge than Easterbrook, though, and if you think that based on this one article you need to do a little homework.
79 posted on
08/28/2003 2:45:43 PM PDT by
lugsoul
To: lugsoul
Based on his own opinion in the Moore case, Myron Thompson would've ruled the same way on this case. Hudspeth ain't a better judge than Easterbrook, though, and if you think that based on this one article you need to do a little homework. So basically it boils down to the judge, or, in effect, the rule of men, not law. Thanks for making my point for me.
86 posted on
08/28/2003 2:51:38 PM PDT by
dirtboy
(Press Alt-Ctrl-Del to reset this tagline)
To: lugsoul
Hudspeth ain't a better judge than Easterbrook, though, and if you think that based on this one article you need to do a little homework. An ARTICLE? This FEDERAL JUDGE sided that the Ten Commandments could stay on STATE PROPERTY in FULL VIEW OF THE PUBLIC in a COURT OF LAW, just as your buddy Easterbrook didn't. You are biased in one direction and I am biased in another. SCOUTS should of rejected the order to remove that monument in Alabama until they ruled on the conflicting Federal judges opinions. If it is right is Texas, it is right in Alabama. Or vise versa.
192 posted on
08/28/2003 6:10:39 PM PDT by
bjs1779
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson