[CyberCowboy777]

So? Every vote for Arnold is one less vote Cruz needs to beat Tom. You logic is circular.

Should all the Tom supporter just fall in line with what you believe is best? Maybe we should instate a council for each party and let them decide the winner of that parties votes?

Who needs debate? If Arnold can win, Arnold is the best candidate.


Do you hear yourself?

[68 grunt]

... Do you hear yourself?

Do you hear anything else besides yourself?

[finnman69]

I think considering the circumstances, Arnold is the best candidate if you want Davis/Bustamente out. Would Arnold be more or less likely than McClintock to work with the state legislature to get things back on track? It's a tossup IMO. Who has better name recognition and is polling higher right now. Arnold.

[BillyBoy]

"PRAGMATIC" REPUBLICANS TRYING TO GET RECALL ON THE BALLOT:

"It DOESN'T matter who replaces Gray because ANYONE is better Davis. ANYONE. This is all about getting rid of him. PERIOD. Even the Green Party guy would make a better governor, or Larry Flint for that matter!! We'll be happy JUST as long as the majority of vote to remove Davis!! Trust us, this is a win-win sitution no matter WHO runs!!"

"PRAGMATIC" REPUBLICANS AFTER THEY GET RECALL ON THE BALLOT:

"A vote for anyone BUT Arnold is a vote for Bustamente. If you pick someone besides OUR guy, you are a DU disruptor working to elect a candidate WORSE than Davis. We CANNOT allow Bustatemente to win, because he's for ARZLAN!!! You HAVE to vote for ONE guy and that's Arnold. IGNORE the other 193 candidates, it's either Arnold or Bustamente!!! Gee, so consistant, aren't they? The WHOLE reason they sold recall as a brillant plan was: A) ANYONE is better than Davis
B) Californias are sick of Davis' failed policies, and will therefore NOT replace him with someone who belives in the same issues.

Now that they got their recall, they have completely moved 180o degrees from their original selling points. We're supposed to forget the whole reason they INSISTED on recall in the FIRST place. Tell me again, why is it "pragmatic" to spending $70 million to "replace" Davis with a guy who will continue the SAME pro-abortion, gun-grabbing, gay-marriage, high-taxes agenda?

[BillyBoy]

"PRAGMATIC" REPUBLICANS TRYING TO GET RECALL ON THE BALLOT:

"It DOESN'T matter who replaces Gray because ANYONE is better Davis. ANYONE. This is all about getting rid of him. PERIOD. Even the Green Party guy would make a better governor, or Larry Flint for that matter!! We'll be happy JUST as long as the majority of vote to remove Davis!! Trust us, this is a win-win sitution no matter WHO runs!!"

"PRAGMATIC" REPUBLICANS AFTER THEY GET RECALL ON THE BALLOT:

"A vote for anyone BUT Arnold is a vote for Bustamente. If you pick someone besides OUR guy, you are a DU disruptor working to elect a candidate WORSE than Davis. We CANNOT allow Bustatemente to win, because he's for ARZLAN!!! You HAVE to vote for ONE guy and that's Arnold. IGNORE the other 193 candidates, it's either Arnold or Bustamente!!!

Gee, so consistant, aren't they? The WHOLE reason they sold recall as a brillant plan was:

A) ANYONE is better than Davis
B) Californias are sick of Davis' failed policies, and will therefore NOT replace him with someone who belives in the same issues.

Now that they got their recall, they have completely moved 180o degrees from their original selling points. We're supposed to forget the whole reason they INSISTED on recall in the FIRST place. Tell me again, why is it "pragmatic" to spending $70 million to "replace" Davis with a guy who will continue the SAME pro-abortion, gun-grabbing, gay-marriage, high-taxes agenda?