I asked the same question re: bruising. Wouldn't the emergency personnel in 1990 have noticed. Didn't they do x-rays, a bone scan? And if they didn't, why not? Was it because Michael refused exploratory exams? If it looked to be abuse, why didn't the personnel notify authorities? Michael wasn't a nurse yet, one with influence. He was just a peon (not meant to be offensive). If Michael was sue-happy, the logical institution to sue would have been that hospital. Not her GYN. Apparently, potassium levels could have been lowered during resusitation.
Then, though, we learn that Terri's parents brought her home about six months after she collapsed. And Michael came to live with them!
Michael is walking on eggshells?
Thirteen months after his wife "collapsed," a bone scan reveals OLD fractures. One doctor said, "It looks like someone worked her over real good."
One other thing, some of the nurses, in their affidavits, said that their on-duty notes were thrown away, not added to Terri's chart by the supervising staff. Michael always wanted to see the chart.
Legally, those attending nurses, LVNs, etc., were remiss in not contacting law enforcement. And I don't care what Michael or Felos, or Judge Greer ordered!
This is what keeps me questioning that Michael strangled her. If he choked her hard enough to cause damage that would show up on a bone scan, there would have been some obvious trauma to the skin. I mean bruises, marks, things that you wouldn't need a scan to catch.
Nurses or other folks with medical knowledge, am I missing something?