Posted on 08/27/2003 3:59:45 PM PDT by journey7873
If you are anything like me, you are smarter than you look:)
Ri-i-i-i-i-i-ght.
Hypocrite.
You owe Bill Clinton an apology, hypocrite.
I'm glad I don't.
You owe Bill Clinton an apology, hypocrite.
YES YES YES.
In a 1977 interview with OUI Magazine, Ahnold acknowledges his drug use:
OUI: Do you use dope?
SCHWARZENEGGER: Yes, grass and hash-no hard drugs ...
In 1988 interview with Playboy, Ahnold changes his tune (the other drugs referred to by the interviewer were roids):
PLAYBOY: What about other drugs; have you done them?
SCHWARZENEGGER: Never in my entire life. When I came to America, someone gave me a drug like speed. He told me it would make me sharper and I'd lose weight. But I lost muscle tone. It was like having a hard-on that's not hard, that is half limp. I don't like that. I like to feel fully pumped. I threw the pills away. Nor has anyone so much as smoked a joint when I was there. Or sniffed coke. Or taken any drugs. In Hollywood, I have never seen any drugs on the set or anywhere. It could be because people know me well enough to know that I don't want anything like that. I'm around actors all the time -- and I've worked with them in Mexico, on jungle locations where you'd think it might happen just to pass the time -- and I've never seen it.
Listen ambrose, you are a one note Johnny. I don't think you are open to exchanging ideas. You just seem to be painted in a corner. You are coming off as desperate. Accusing Arnold of lying will not get me to vote for McClintock.
For those who claim they only cared about Clinton's sex life post monica, and the deposition, quit being stinking hypocrites. Jennifer Flowers ring a bell? I am sure we all said, well he wasn't under oath, and he wasn't in office as President, it's really not that big of a deal.
If we could take a retroactive journey back to 1992, and somebody drug out a never published interview with Clinton from 1967, where he said the exact things Arnold did, while he was still single... I am sure that everybody here would have said that was swell. Oh yeah, youthful stuff. Nothing to see here, move on. Arnold was 29 here. The stories have been making the rounds here in California for years, that he never lost his eye for the ladies even after marriage.
Some people here need to take yoga very quickly, or they are going to get stuck in a pretzel shape from all the contortions they are using to justify supporting a tax loving, gun banning, oil drilling hating, Kennedy who treats women like pieces of meat. Must have been what endeared him to the family.
I would like people to just say, I just don't want a tax raise. Arnold can sacrifice babies on a satanic altar, as long as he leaves taxes alone.
I can handle a lot of stuff but lying to Playboy is just something I won't tolerate!
.
.
.
.
/sarcasm
I certainly wasn't one of them. In fact I didn't even agree with impeaching Clinton because of Monicagate because I thought there were far worse impeachable offences. If it was known that Arnold still had a problem today (or within the last 5-10 years) with drugs or infidelity I would say this is relevant. But it's obvious to me this is nothing more than a smear tactic by Drudge (and no doubt the Dems will run with it). Maybe it's because Arnold is pro-choice and Drudge is not. But let's not forget Drudge ran on his website several times (even the same day Arnold was on Leno)that he was NOT going to run and then of course he announces he is running on Leno, leaving Drudge with egg on his face. Perhaps that has something to do with Drudge's campaign against him.
Well, now we know why Arnie was so quick to defend Bill Clinton.
They're soulmates.
And that speaks volumes about both you and the other Ahnold boosters on this forum.
True or not, the conventional wisdom for years in Hollywood, has been that Arnold plays the field and the tabloids are just trying to get the right goods on him.
They will release it the week-end before the election, after Karl Rove has already told McClintock to back out for the good of the party.
Arnold was single, he was engaged in completely consensual activities, and nobody feared for their lives. He never commited perjury. Ultimately, there is good evidence that he settled down, married, and continues to have a successful (i.e., not sham) marriage.
You guys might as well give it up, the Clinton situation is completely different. Time to move on, the California electorate doesn't care.
I don't think McClintock or Ueberroth would stoop to this level. And they don't have to because someone else will do it for them (Drudge). But obviously this is the Dems advantage. They're confidant they can beat McClintock so of course they want him to be the Republican candidate at the end of the day. The more Conservatives trash Arnold the better it is for Cruz and Co.
Listen ambrose, you are a one note Johnny. I don't think you are open to exchanging ideas. You just seem to be painted in a corner. You are coming off as desperate. Accusing Arnold of lying will not get me to vote for McClintock.
Your refusal to answer the simple question speaks volumes about you and other Ahnold boosters on this forum. You Clintinoids want to make me vomit. Oh yes, I am desperate... seeing another bubble burst... I thought people on this forum really were enraged by Clinton's lying and depravity. They weren't, it was all huffing and puffing. They were pissed off because Clinton had a "D" next to his name. They're fine with Ahnold because there's an "R" next to his.
Sickening, truly sickening...
So what are you doing here? Are you a masochist? If I was so unhappy or suffering to the extent you claim to be, I would move on. Life is too short.
Anything he did in Oxford, Moscow were all youthful escapades that nobody here cared about.
Do you have a bridge in Brooklyn you are going to try to sell me next too?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.