Skip to comments.
Legislator Tries to Censor Mel Gibson's 'The Passion'
NewsMax.com ^
| Aug. 27, 2003
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 08/27/2003 3:04:44 PM PDT by joobers
With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff For the story behind the story...
Wednesday, Aug. 27, 2003 Legislator Tries to Censor Mel Gibson's 'The Passion'
New York Assemblyman Dov Hikind has planned a press conference Thursday to demand that 20th Century Fox not distribute Mel Gibsons movie "The Passion, says Catholic League For Religious and Civil Rights.
Hikind asserts that the film "resurrects the age-old canard of deicide and "can incite anti-Semitic violence.
Catholic League president William A. Donohue said today:
The furor over Mel Gibsons film has now reached a fever pitch. Assemblyman Hikinds response is an example of how reaction to "The Passion" has spilled into hysteria.
Assemblyman Hikind has alleged that the movie implicates all Jews in the crucifixion, a common misconception of those who havent seen the movie. In fact, absolutely nothing in the film is inconsistent with Nostra Aetate, which repudiated the idea of collective guilt of the Jewish people for Jesus death.
The contention that the film will spur anti-Semitic fervor is nonsense. Jack Valenti, president of the Motion Picture Association of America, after seeing the film, commented, You can quote me Mel Gibsons 'The Passion' is not anti-Semitic. I did not see any anti-Semitism in it.
If the Catholic League for one moment thought this would inspire anti-Semitism, it would condemn the movie. Indeed, just last year, the league joined with Dov Hikind and other Jews in calling for a boycott of New Yorks Jewish Museum, which exhibited art that trivialized the Holocaust.
Having seen the movie twice, I agree with the hundreds of Catholics, Protestants, and Jews who have now seen The Passion. It is near unanimous: this movie will not foment anti-Semitism. Any such blind charges are vacuous.
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Mel Gibson Passion
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: dovhikind; fear; jew; liberal; melgibson; passion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
1
posted on
08/27/2003 3:04:45 PM PDT
by
joobers
To: joobers
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...
2
posted on
08/27/2003 3:08:34 PM PDT
by
pbear8
( sed libera nos a malo)
To: joobers
This is not just about getting a movie plot changed. The underlying agenda is making Christianity illegal. We have people who think nothing of Hollywood churning out violence, sex, drugs, etc. in movies. However, just let Mel make a movie about Jesus, and the tolerance crowd suddenly advocates censorship. Where is the ACLU in all of this? Already, in other countries, it is being made a hate crime to reference Scripture, when condemning homosexuality.
3
posted on
08/27/2003 3:09:23 PM PDT
by
Paul Atreides
(Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
To: joobers
******The furor over Mel Gibsons film has now reached a fever pitch.^******
Good for Hikind. With the publicity he's giving the move, even more people will go to see it.
4
posted on
08/27/2003 3:10:06 PM PDT
by
kitkat
To: joobers
"New York Assemblyman Dov Hikind has planned a press conference Thursday to demand that 20th Century Fox not distribute Mel Gibsons movie "The Passion, says Catholic League For Religious and Civil Rights."
Ok, for all you on the left, this is a true example of censorship. It occurs when The STATE becomes the arbiter of what shall be viewed and what shall not be viewed. It isn't about a boycott, or organized demonstration, or even what you school says cannot be read in the grade school library. You can always read it outside the class.
This is a GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL demanding this film not be distributed. THIS is censorship as much as any Nazi, or Communist, or Facists, or Cuban dictator.
And note, it is a Democrat who is calling for this.
5
posted on
08/27/2003 3:10:07 PM PDT
by
OpusatFR
To: pbear8
worth repeating: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...."
6
posted on
08/27/2003 3:10:44 PM PDT
by
Theo
To: OpusatFR
Where's the ACLU?
7
posted on
08/27/2003 3:12:00 PM PDT
by
Paul Atreides
(Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
To: kitkat
Various major distributors are vying for the domestic rights to THE PASSION. Mel Gibson will have no trouble getting this picture shown to the public, and with this kind of buildup boxoffice should be very healthy indeed.
8
posted on
08/27/2003 3:13:07 PM PDT
by
Argus
To: Paul Atreides
Probably hauling Bene Gesserit into court for using religions to promote political agendas.
Whoops. I had no idea the BG were democrats!
9
posted on
08/27/2003 3:13:35 PM PDT
by
OpusatFR
To: Paul Atreides
I can't wait to see this film.
10
posted on
08/27/2003 3:13:59 PM PDT
by
My Favorite Headache
(Which one will lose? Depends on what I choose or maybe which voice...I ignore.)
To: Theo
worth repeating: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...." Yes worth repeating but does anyone understand what it means? The courts seem not to. It means that there can be no law, none, nada, zilch, zero laws concerning religion or the free exercise thereof. Therefore why do we have federal judges ruling on laws that don't exist such as the case down in Alabama? Will someone explain that to me, please.
11
posted on
08/27/2003 3:15:53 PM PDT
by
mc5cents
To: joobers
12
posted on
08/27/2003 3:18:32 PM PDT
by
My Favorite Headache
(Which one will lose? Depends on what I choose or maybe which voice...I ignore.)
To: joobers
Why not just DEMAND that all prints be burned?
I'd feel much safer if Mr. Hikind acted as my personal screener/Vchip and kept my life free from "offensive" images/writing/music/fashion
13
posted on
08/27/2003 3:18:32 PM PDT
by
Range Rover
(Karma is a boomerang...)
To: My Favorite Headache
"I can't wait to see this film...."
Read the book, can't wait for the movie.
14
posted on
08/27/2003 3:18:38 PM PDT
by
MaryFromMichigan
( If a man says something in the woods and there are no women there, is he still wrong?)
To: OpusatFR
R.M. Gaius Hillary Rodham
15
posted on
08/27/2003 3:19:27 PM PDT
by
Paul Atreides
(Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
To: joobers
Here's a photo of the cretin:
16
posted on
08/27/2003 3:20:45 PM PDT
by
per loin
To: Range Rover

A Scene from The Passion
17
posted on
08/27/2003 3:21:45 PM PDT
by
My Favorite Headache
(Which one will lose? Depends on what I choose or maybe which voice...I ignore.)
To: OpusatFR
Everyone click on this link to support this film:
http://www.passion-movie.com/english/support.html
18
posted on
08/27/2003 3:24:43 PM PDT
by
My Favorite Headache
(Which one will lose? Depends on what I choose or maybe which voice...I ignore.)
To: Paul Atreides
That's Democrat Assemblyman Dov Hikind.
To: Paul Atreides
2000 years later, the name of Jesus still produces extreme reaction and political action. That alone should be an endorsement of learning more about His life, whatever the medium.
20
posted on
08/27/2003 3:26:39 PM PDT
by
MHT
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson