Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
I am half way thru your post and entranced. Fascinated. And bummed at my lack of knowledge.

I will help keep this bumped. I'm not a researcher....but would love to read this book that was cursed and left out of our current Bible. The mistranslation of the Kind James version of the Bible (my version), leaving out the words, 'the Elect One', ( God's words regarding his beloved Son, Jesus the Christ ), is unsettling, somehow. To think that the authors of the King James version were seeking agreement between the books of the New Testament (Mark and Matthew with Luke) seems so wrongful. Especially when you consider their letter to King James explaining their efforts and dedication to true transcription.

This is going to be fascinating Alamo-girl. I look forward to following this thread.<p.Ah well-back to devouring your post.... :^)

5 posted on 08/27/2003 11:51:55 AM PDT by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Republic
Thank you so much for your interest and for your encouragement!

Truly, I believe you can rely on the King James version. I doubt there were many such substitutions. Moreover, these days it is convenient to use a parallel Bible and research the actual language on the internet to settle any differences to one's own satisfaction!

There are copies of Enoch online, but I much prefer the printed versions in the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha by Charlesworth - because it contains a lot commentary on the translation, history, etc.

7 posted on 08/27/2003 12:01:23 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Republic
The mistranslation of the Kind James version of the Bible (my version), leaving out the words, 'the Elect One', ( God's words regarding his beloved Son, Jesus the Christ ), is unsettling, somehow. To think that the authors of the King James version were seeking agreement between the books of the New Testament (Mark and Matthew with Luke) seems so wrongful.

You should know that the King James translators were working with the Textus Receptus (a Greek version of the New Testament), and in the Textus Receptus it says "beloved" rather than "elect." Other Greek manuscripts, however, say "elect," and so many newer translations say "elect" or "chosen." You can see this using this site: http://www.searchgodsword.org/

So, the King James translators were not being somehow deceitful here.
77 posted on 08/28/2003 11:55:52 AM PDT by jam137 (see my FR homepage for CA Recall perspectives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Republic
The mistranslation of the Kind James version of the Bible (my version), leaving out the words, 'the Elect One',

Please explain more I am new to this search!

133 posted on 09/06/2003 12:28:05 PM PDT by restornu (Always keep your words soft and sweet, just in case you have to eat them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson