Skip to comments.
An Alternate Road Map
The Conning Tower ^
| Aug. 25, 2003
| Trentino
Posted on 08/26/2003 3:08:27 PM PDT by Davis
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: tictoc
Israel has offensive capabilities that haven't been seen in decades ... and new tactics and equipment to be utilized way before the threat, let alone use, of nuclear weapons. Short of the Samson Option, I don't expect Israel to be nuking any time soon.
21
posted on
08/26/2003 8:14:45 PM PDT
by
Optimist
(I think I'm beginning to see a pattern here.)
To: Davis
A. Trentino
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
22
posted on
08/26/2003 9:32:58 PM PDT
by
Valin
(America is a vast conspiracy to make you happy.)
Comment #23 Removed by Moderator
To: Davis
What a complete idiot. Period.
24
posted on
08/27/2003 3:52:05 AM PDT
by
Paul_B
To: Davis
This is bilge.
It is appropriate to point out the weaknesses of the Road Map to hell.
It is beyond foolishness to propose that Israel use nuclear weapons against Arab cities without cause.
And please don't pretend to tell us that Palestinian terrorism is due cause to use nuclear weapons.
Trentino wins three Batboys for the sheer, unadulterated idiocy of this article:
Be Seeing You,
Chris
25
posted on
08/27/2003 4:06:30 AM PDT
by
section9
(To read my blog, click on the Major!)
To: SJackson
The third most important historical site, this place? It's importance is a recent phenom. The third most important holy site, made so by anti-Israeli arabs building up the importance of the so-called "Furthest Mosque" referred to in Mohammed's Night Journey fantasy (which did not actually exist at the time of the imagined journey).
26
posted on
08/27/2003 6:10:16 AM PDT
by
Mackey
To: section9; Valin; Paul_B
You guys think name-calling is a substitute for argument" You think posting ghoulish picture is the equivalent of rational conversation?
Even since its founding in the seventh century, Islam has been at war with the West, with Christianity. You can look it up, you know. The history books will tell you why Bosnia is Muslim and that the Ottoman Turks were stopped from enslaving Europe--forcibly converting Christians to Islam at the gates of Vienna in 1653. Islam is on the warpath again.
The blasts of explosives in Bali, Africa, at the Marine Barracks in Beirut, at the WTC in New York and the Pentagon, and the USS Cole aren't mythical. We are at war with Islam, and we better win.
There's nothing flaky about Trentino's scenario--which is probably why you people resort to name-calling. It's time to be serious.
27
posted on
08/27/2003 7:08:10 AM PDT
by
hrhdave
To: hrhdave
I can't speak for the oyhers but when I see something as world-class stupid as this piece of rambleing tripe I am forced to fall back on name calling.
28
posted on
08/27/2003 7:51:02 AM PDT
by
Valin
(America is a vast conspiracy to make you happy.)
To: hrhdave
His prescription is completely flakey because there are lower-level solutions he skips over - namely, dealing more definitively with the Pals themselves. It's irresponsible and immoral to drag in other nations unless necessary. By doing so, Israel would lose the moral high ground, and world opinion with it. Even her friends, few as they are, would be hard-pressed to defend her actions. Much ground would be lost.
29
posted on
08/27/2003 8:07:39 AM PDT
by
Paul_B
To: Paul_B; PhilDragoo
>>It's irresponsible and immoral to drag in other nations unless necessary. << Those other nationas are the suppliers, moneybags, aiders and abettors of the bus-bombers. Time to strike them--hard.
It's imperative that Israel not let the "moral high ground" you speak seve as a graveyard. You don't lose your moral high ground by killing your mortal enemies. You affirm it.
30
posted on
08/27/2003 8:53:47 AM PDT
by
hrhdave
To: Paul_B
Here's are some of many Arab-Muslim declarations of the War of Extermination.
Earlier this summer, Hamas leader Abdel Aziz Rantisi declared, "By G-d, we will not leave one Jew in Palestine (meaning Israel as well as the territories)," justifying his pledge by claiming, "This is our land, not the Jews'." Last year, the leader of Hizbollah, Hassan Nassrallah, mused, "If they (Jews) all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide." And Hizbollah's protector, the Syrian government, is no less open about its desire to kill all Jews. Syria's Minister of Defense, Mustapha Tlass, opined in a television interview two years ago that if "every Arab killed a Jew, no Jews would remain," and added that he personally wanted "to kill any Jew he faced."
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0803/mowbray_2003_08_28.php3
The appropriate response of Israel is to kill their enemy before the enemy gathers the strength to match his murderous intentions. It's called "self-defence."
31
posted on
08/28/2003 7:57:18 AM PDT
by
hrhdave
To: Paul_B
If the situation was reversed and the Arab countries had the nukes, do you think they would be bound by the moral "high ground?" Since they flat out say NO, the answer is clear.
32
posted on
09/25/2003 11:28:00 PM PDT
by
Desecrated
(A nickel of every tax dollar should go toward the defense of America)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson